What is the best contemporary treatment for in-stent restenosis?

In-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a challenging problem in percutaneous coronary intervention and the optimal treatment strategy remains unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the 18 month clinical outcomes in patients receiving sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) with vascular brachytherapy (VBT) for the treatment of ISR. Twenty-five consecutive patients treated with VBT were compared with 29 patients who had SES deployment for ISR. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as a combination of death from cardiac causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or repeat TVR. At 18 month follow-up, the MACE rate was significantly lower in the SES compared with the VBT group (14% vs 40%, P=.03). One patient in the VBT group developed late stent thrombosis (at 10 months) and died; there was no stent thrombosis in the SES group. This observational study, taken with other recent reports, offers further credence to the use of SES for ISR. The results of randomized comparisons with VBT are awaited with interest.

Impact of oedema on implant geometry and dosimetry for temporary high dose rate brachytherapy of the prostate.

The optimal timing of dosimetry for permanent seed prostatic implants remains contentious given the half life of post-implant oedema resolution. The aim of this study was to establish whether prostatic oedematous change over the duration of a temporary high dose rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy (BR) boost would result in significant needle displacement, and whether this change in geometry would influence dosimetry. Two CT scans, one for dosimetric purposes on the day of the implant and the second just prior to implant removal, were obtained for four patients receiving transperineal interstitial prostate brachytherapy. The relative changes in cross-sectional dimensions of the implants were calculated by establishing the change in mean radial distance (MRD) of the needle positions from the geometric centre of the implant for each patient's pair of CT studies. The treatment plan, as calculated from the first CT scan, was used in the second set of CT images to allow a comparison of dose distribution. The percentage change in MRD over the duration of the temporary implants ranged from -1.91% to 1.95%. The maximum change in estimated volume was 3.94%. Dosimetric changes were negligible. In the four cases studied, the degree of oedematous change and consequent displacement of flexiguide needle positions was negligible and did not impact on the dosimetry. The rate and direction of oedematous change can be extremely variable but on the basis of the four cases studied and the results of a larger recent study, it might not be necessary to re-image patients for dosimetric purposes over the duration of a fractionated HDR BT boost to the prostate where flexiguide needles are utilized. Nevertheless, further investigation with larger patient numbers is required.

Monte Carlo dosimetry of a tandem positioned beta-emitting intravascular brachytherapy source train.

Prevention of restenosis following interventional coronary procedures with catheter based beta-emitting sources is currently under clinical trial investigations. Systems utilizing fixed length source trains limit the clinician's ability to increase the radiation source length as required. A technique known as "pull back" is used when the segment of artery requiring radiation is longer than the available fixed length source train. In this instance, tandem positioning of the fixed length source is used to treat the longer length of artery. The aim of this study was to examine the dosimetry of the junction region associated with pull back treatments using a commercially available 90Sr/Y catheter based intravascular brachytherapy source train. Dose profiles were calculated, using the Monte Carlo code MCNP4B, at radial distances of 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 mm for pull back techniques using 2.5 mm overlapping, abutting, and 2.5 mm spaced source trains. Results at the protocol prescription radius of 2 mm showed a junction dose elevated 61% above prescription for 2.5 mm overlapping source trains. For 2.5 mm spaced trains, this figure falls to 64% below prescription dose. In contrast, abutted source trains exhibited only a 1% depression below prescription dose in the junction region. The reference point dose rate per unit activity of this source was found to be consistent with previous studies.