Oncologic treatment support via a dedicated mobile app: a prospective feasibility evaluation (OPTIMISE-1).

BACKGROUND: Mobile health (mhealth) is gaining interest, with mobile devices and apps being ever more available among medical facilities and patients. However, in the field of radiation oncology, the medical benefits of mhealth apps are still underexplored. As an additional approach to patient care during radiotherapy, we designed a mobile treatment surveillance app based on patient-reported outcomes. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine the feasibility of app-based treatment surveillance in patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT). Alongside technical practicability and acceptance, we assessed patient satisfaction and quality of life during treatment. METHODS: This prospective single-center study was performed at Heidelberg University Hospital between August 2018 and January 2020. During RT we measured patients' quality of life, symptoms, and treatment satisfaction. Respective questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 with diagnosis-specific modules, RAND PSQ-18) were presented to patients via a mobile app running on a designated tablet device. The primary endpoint was determined by the fraction of patients who completed at least 80% of the items. Secondary endpoints were disease-related quality of life and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 49 cancer patients (14 breast, 13 pelvic, 12 lung, 10 prostate) were eligible for analysis. 79.6% (95% confidence interval: 66.4-88.5%; n = 39) of all patients completed at least 80% of the items received by the mobile app. A mean of 227.5 ± 48.25 questions were answered per patient. Breast cancer patients showed the highest rate of answered questions, with 92.9% (n = 13) completing at least 80% of the items. CONCLUSION: Patients showed high acceptance, with 79.6% (n = 39) completing at least 80% of the given items. The use of a mobile app for reporting symptoms and quality of life during RT is feasible and well accepted by patients. It may allow for resource-efficient, detailed feedback to the medical staff and assist in the assessment of side effects over time.

Upfront and Repeated Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients With Brain Metastases From NSCLC.

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 40% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients develop brain metastases (BM). Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) instead of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is increasingly administered as an upfront treatment to patients with a limited number of BM. We present outcomes and validation of prognostic scores for these patients treated with upfront SRS. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 199 patients with a total of 268 SRS courses for 539 brain metastases. Median patient age was 63 years. For larger BM, dose reduction to 18 Gy or hypofractionated SRS in 6 fractions was applied. We analyzed the BMV-, the RPA-, the GPA- and the lung-mol GPA score. Cox proportional hazards models with univariate and multivariate analyses were fitted for overall survival (OS) and intracranial progression-free survival (icPFS). RESULTS: Sixty-four patients died, 7 of them of neurological causes. Thirty eight patients (19,3%) required a salvage WBRT. Median OS was 38, 8 months (IQR: 6-NA). In univariate analysis as well as multivariate analysis, the Karnofsky performance scale index (KPI) ≥90% (P = 0, 012 and P = 0, 041) remained as independent prognostic factor for longer OS. All 4 prognostic scoring indices could be validated for OS assessment (BMV P = 0, 007; RPA P = 0, 026; GPA P = 0, 003; lung-mol GPA P = 0, 05). CONCLUSION: In this large cohort of NSCLC patients with BM treated with upfront and repeated SRS, OS was markedly favourable, in comparison to literature. Upfront SRS is an effective treatment approach in those patients and can decidedly reduce the impact of BM on overall prognosis. Furthermore, the analysed scores are useful prognostic tools for OS prediction.

Psychosocial Characteristics of Patients Evaluated for Kidney, Liver, or Heart Transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: Psychosocial parameters play a pivotal role in organ recipient evaluation before wait-listing for transplantation because of their impact on organ and patient outcome. Patients in need of heart (HTx), liver (LTx), or kidney transplantation (KTx) face distinct physical and psychological challenges. This study compares the psychosocial characteristics and preferences for additional therapy for patients undergoing assessment for these three types of organ transplantation to optimize patient-tailored psychological, social, and other supportive interventions. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, observational study with 1110 potential transplantation candidates (LTx, n = 544; KTx, n = 330; HTx, n = 236), psychosocial status was determined for depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale), anxiety symptoms (seven-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener), health-related quality of life (36-Item Short Form Health Survey), perceived social support (Perceived Social Support Questionnaire), sense of coherence (SoC; short form of the Sense of Coherence Scale), self-efficacy (General Self-Efficacy Short Scale), and body image (German Body Image Questionnaire-20). Preferences for additional supportive therapy were assessed dichotomously. Data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of covariance and χ2 tests. RESULTS: Patient groups differed significantly regarding depression ( F (2,1107) = 35.283, p < .001, partial η2 = 0.01), anxiety ( F (2,1107) = 15.027, p < .001, partial η2 = 0.03), health-related quality of life (physical: F (2,1107) = 96.772, p < .001, partial η2 = 0.15; mental: F (2,1107) = 11.442, p < .001, partial η2 = 0.02), perceived social support ( F (2,1107) = 20.813, p < .001, partial η2 = 0.04), SoC ( F (2,1107) = 12.920, p < .001, partial η2 = 0.02), self-efficacy ( F (2,1107) = 17.308, p < .001, partial η2 = 0.03), and body image (rejecting body evaluation: F (2,1107) = 5.006, p = .007, partial η2 = 0.01; vital body dynamics: F (2,1107) = 40.216, p < .001, partial η2 = 0.07). Patients evaluated for HTx showed the highest psychosocial impairment and the highest inclination regarding additional supportive therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients evaluated for HTx, LTx, and KTx have distinct psychosocial characteristics and treatment preferences. HTx patients display the highest psychosocial impairment. We suggest psychocardiological treatment structures for optimal outcome.

Severe skin toxicity during whole-brain radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and additional drug intake including St. John's wort skin oil.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) often requires a multimodal treatment including chemotherapy, targeted therapy and radiotherapy. In addition to this, many patients take supportive drugs. Since only scarce data on possible interactions between radiotherapy and pharmaceutical or herbal drugs exist, description of clinical cases is of special interest. CASE REPORT: A patient with stage IV NSCLC was treated with docetaxel/ramucirumab followed by radiotherapy for brain and bone metastases while taking several other over-the-counter drugs (OTCs) including topical St. John's wort skin oil. RESULTS: A 63-year-old female patient with stage IV NSCLC presented with 11 asymptomatic brain metastases and a painful osteolytic bone metastasis in the 12th thoracic vertebral body (T12). Four weeks before the start of palliative whole-brain radiotherapy and bone irradiation of T12, she was administered a combination of docetaxel and ramucirumab. At an administered dose of 24 Gy, the patient presented with severe folliculitis capitis, while skin examination over the thoracolumbar spine was unremarkable although skin dose was similar. After thorough questioning, the patient reported using a herbal skin oil that contained St. John's wort for scalp care only, but not for skin care of her back during radiotherapy. After stopping the topical application of the skin oil, folliculitis improved with a course of systemic and topical antibiotics within 10 days, though the healing process was prolonged and included desquamation and hyperpigmentation. CONCLUSION: St. John's wort seems to be a significant radiosensitizer for photon radiotherapy and can cause severe skin toxicity even though the literature lacks data on this interaction. As an OTC, it is easily accessible and often used by oncological patients due to antidepressant and local antimicrobial and pain-relieving effects.

Progression of Pulmonary Function and Correlation with Survival Following Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Central and Ultracentral Lung Tumors.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to central and ultracentral lung tumors carries a risk of excessive toxicity. This study analyzed changes in pulmonary function tests (PFT) and their correlation with overall survival (OS) in 107 patients following central (n = 62) or ultracentral (n = 45) lung SBRT. Ultracentral location was defined as planning target volume overlap with the proximal bronchial tree (PBT). Vital capacity (VC) (-0.3 l, absolute -9.4% of predicted, both p < 0.001) and forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1s) (-0.2 l, absolute -7.7% of predicted, both p < 0.001) significantly decreased following SBRT. Higher maximum dose to the PBT significantly correlated with a steeper decline in VC (p = 0.005) and FEV1s (p = 0.03) over time. Pronounced decline in FEV1s between 6 and 12 months (HR = 0.90, p = 0.006) and pronounced decline in VC between baseline and 12 months (HR = 0.95, p = 0.004) independently correlated with worse OS. Consequently, PFT presented a statistically significant albeit clinically mild decrease in lung volumes following central and ultracentral SBRT that correlated moderately with maximum dose to the PBT. Stronger decline in pulmonary function was associated with constrained survival, advocating consequent performance of PFT during follow-up.