Treatment recommendations for the use of antipsychotics for aggressive youth (TRAAY). Part II.

OBJECTIVE: To develop treatment recommendations for the use of antipsychotic medications for children and adolescents with serious psychiatric disorders and externalizing behavior problems. METHOD: Using a combination of evidence- and consensus-based methodologies, recommendations were developed in six phases as informed by three primary sources of information: (1) current scientific evidence (published and unpublished), (2) the expressed needs for treatment-relevant information and guidance specified by clinicians in a series of focus groups, and (3) consensus of clinical and research experts derived from a formal survey and a consensus workshop. RESULTS: Fourteen treatment recommendations on the use of atypical antipsychotics for aggression in youth with comorbid psychiatric conditions were developed. Each recommendation corresponds to one of the phases of care (evaluation, treatment, stabilization, and maintenance) and includes a brief clinical rationale that draws upon the available scientific evidence and consensus expert opinion derived from survey data and a consensus workshop. CONCLUSION: Until additional research from controlled trials becomes available, these evidence- and consensus-based treatment recommendations may be a useful approach to guide the use of antipsychotics in youth with aggression.

Treatment recommendations for the use of antipsychotics for aggressive youth (TRAAY). Part I: a review.

OBJECTIVES: To review the evidence for the safety and efficacy of nonpharmacological and pharmacological treatments for aggression in children and adolescents. METHOD: and searches (1990-present) were conducted for double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of atypical antipsychotics for aggression and for literature on the use of other pharmacological agents and psychosocial interventions for aggression. Case reports and adult literature regarding the safety of atypical antipsychotics were used where controlled data for youth were lacking. RESULTS: Controlled data on the treatment of aggression in youth is scarce. Psychosocial interventions may be effective alone or in combination with pharmacological treatments. Psychotropic agents (e.g., stimulants, mood stabilizers, beta-blockers) have also been shown to have limited efficacy in reducing aggression. Antipsychotics, particularly the atypical antipsychotics, show substantial efficacy in the treatment of aggression in selected pediatric populations. Atypical antipsychotics are generally associated with fewer extrapyramidal symptoms than are typical antipsychotics. CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial interventions and atypical antipsychotics are promising treatments for aggression in youth. Double-blind studies should examine the safety and efficacy of atypical antipsychotics compared to each other and to medications from other classes, the efficacy of specific medications for different subtypes of aggression, combining various psychotropic medications, optimal dosages, and long-term safety.

"Real world" atypical antipsychotic prescribing practices in public child and adolescent inpatient settings.

This article examines the factors that influence antipsychotic use among youth treated in public inpatient facilities. By combining data from 11 focus groups, a survey of 43 researchers and clinicians, and a chart review of 100 closed patient charts, we investigated the interplay between physicians' and staff members' perceptions of problems related to antipsychotic prescribing, their beliefs concerning optimal approaches, their actual recorded prescribing behaviors, and the discrepancies between their beliefs and their recorded practices. We discovered that antipsychotics are prescribed broadly to treat a variety of conditions, including nonpsychotic disorders among children in public inpatient facilities. Despite overall expert consensus regarding "best practices," physicians described systemic obstacles that prevent the application of these practices, and our data confirmed that best practices are not always followed. Future research should be done with this patient population and should investigate the factors that influence antipsychotic use among inpatient youth.