Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Obes (Lond) ; 39(2): 361-7, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25081363

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: We have previously shown that 500 ml of a foamed drink ('foam') significantly improved appetite versus a non-foamed control. The objectives of this research were to assess the effect of smaller volumes of foams on appetite, and the potential benefits of foam ingestion and its timing on appetite measures in a reduced-energy context. SUBJECTS/METHODS: Two randomized, parallel design studies (pre- and main study) were conducted using healthy adult subjects. Pre-study: 133 subjects (age 18-50 years, body mass index (BMI) 20-32 kg m(-2)) each consumed either 10, 25, 50, 100, 150 or 250 ml foamed meal replacer (~0.2 kcal ml(-1)), 150 min after a fixed breakfast. Main study: four groups of subjects (n=134; age 18-60 years, BMI 22.5-35.0 kg m(-2)) consumed 200 ml/22 kcal foam (based on pre-study results) immediately after main meals (M), after snacks (S), in-between snacks and main meals (I) or not at all (control, C) within 1 day of a reduced-energy meal plan consisting of three main meals and three snacks. Measurements included self-reported appetite (six scales, reported as area under the curve (AUC)) and (main study only) end-of-day appetite questionnaire. RESULTS: Pre-study: the strongest effect on appetite was produced by 250 ml (consistent across scales), whereas 150 ml showed more pronounced effects than 100 and 50 ml in most scales. Volumes 10 and 25 ml had no effects on any scale. Main study: 200 ml foam reduced appetite AUC substantially in all treatments, particularly M (for example, hunger AUC reduced by 35% (P <0.001), 28% (P <0.05) and 20% (P=0.11) for M, S and I, respectively versus C). A strong reduction in 'appetite for a snack' was seen for all timings (all P <0.05). The end-of-day appetite ratings confirmed these findings. CONCLUSIONS: Modest amounts of a low-energy foam can reduce appetite measures during a 1-day reduced-energy meal plan.


Subject(s)
Appetite/physiology , Beverages , Diet, Reducing/methods , Energy Intake , Hunger/physiology , Satiety Response/physiology , Adult , Appetite Regulation , Area Under Curve , Feeding Behavior , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postprandial Period
2.
Int J Obes (Lond) ; 35(2): 244-50, 2011 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20644555

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Protease inhibitor 2 derived from potato (PI2) is claimed to reduce appetite and food intake, stimulate the satiety hormone cholecystokinin (CCK) and lower postprandial glucose peaks when taken before a meal. However, current literature is inconclusive with regard to its efficacy and mechanism. Furthermore, the potential effect of PI2 on appetite motivational ratings without an immediately following meal has not previously been reported. OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively test the effects of 30 mg PI2 in a minidrink on appetite ratings, subsequent food intake, and plasma CCK and glucose responses. DESIGN: Minidrinks with or without 30 mg PI2 were compared in three separate substudies (A, B and C), each using a two-way, placebo-controlled, balanced-order, cross-over design and 23 or 24 subjects (mean over groups: body mass index 25.0 kg m(-2), range 22.5-30.7 kg m(-2); age 41.3, range 18-62 years). The minidrink was given (A) 120 or (B) 30 min before an ad libitum lunch or (C) 30 min before a fixed lunch. Study parameters were self-reported satiety (substudies A and C), ad libitum meal intake (substudies A and B), and (in an n=12 subset) plasma CCK and blood glucose in all substudies. All results were analyzed using analysis of covariance. Protease-inhibitory activity of the PI2-containing minidrinks was assessed under simulated gut conditions. RESULTS: PI2 did not differ from control for any study parameters, in any substudy, despite confirmation of the inhibitory activity of PI2. CONCLUSIONS: In this study protease inhibition using PI2 in a minidrink at a dose of 30 mg, as commercially used, had no (functional) efficacy on a range of behavioral and physiological appetite and intake control measures.


Subject(s)
Appetite Regulation/drug effects , Cholecystokinin/blood , Eating/drug effects , Plant Preparations/pharmacology , Protease Inhibitors/pharmacology , Satiation/drug effects , Solanum tuberosum/chemistry , Adolescent , Adult , Appetite Regulation/physiology , Beverages , Cross-Over Studies , Eating/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Phytotherapy , Plant Preparations/administration & dosage , Postprandial Period , Protease Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Satiation/physiology , United Kingdom , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...