Occurrence of common frog (Rana temporaria) and common toad (Bufo bufo) adults and metamorphs in agricultural fields in Germany: Potential for exposure to plant protection products.

To characterize the potential for exposure of amphibian terrestrial life stages to plant protection products (PPP), we studied the occurrence and habitat use of adult and metamorph common frogs (Rana temporaria) and common toads (Bufo bufo) in an agricultural landscape in Germany. The four selected study sites were breeding ponds with approximately 80% agricultural land within a 1-km radius. Adults were monitored by radio tracking for two years, and metamorph numbers were assessed for one summer using pitfall traps alongside drift fences. The results demonstrate that adults were rarely present in arable fields at any of the sites (overall 0.5% and 4% of total observations for frogs and toads, respectively). Metamorph captures in arable fields were more variable, ranging from 1.2% to 38.8% (frogs) and from 0.0% to 26.1% (toads) across study sites. Unsurprisingly, most captures in arable fields for both toad and frog metamorphs occurred at the site where the pond was completely surrounded by arable fields. Overall, the presence of adult amphibians in arable fields was limited and, for the metamorphs, occurred primarily when crops were denser and PPP spray interception higher. Diurnal hiding behavior was observed with the highest activity recorded at night, further reducing the risk of dermal exposure from direct PPP overspraying. In addition, it appeared that alternative habitats, such as woody structures or water bodies in the broader surrounding area, were preferred by the animals over the arable areas. The use of buffer zones around water bodies in agricultural areas would be an effective risk mitigation measure to protect terrestrial adults and metamorphs residing there and would reduce spray drift entry into water bodies during PPP application. It is hoped that these results will contribute to the discussion of risk assessment and mitigation options for amphibians. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2024;00:1-13. © 2024 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).

Analysis and management of herbicidal mixtures in a high-intensity agricultural landscape in Belgium.

Water bodies located in anthropogenically influenced environments, such as agricultural landscapes, may be exposed to different chemicals simultaneously or sequentially. Yet, current environmental risk assessments focus on single active substances for unintended mixtures. For 3.5 years, the present study monitored the mixture of herbicides, within an intensively managed agricultural catchment, accompanied by a stewardship program. Twelve herbicides and one metabolite were monitored on a daily to sub-daily basis, generating a unique, high temporal resolution data set, enabling an assessment of cumulative exposure in a worst-case scenario. Analyses focused on the number of events at which the herbicide mixture concentration exceeded the regulatory accepted concentration for algae and macrophytes, based on concentration addition, and the potential factors influencing the frequency of these events are considered. A low number of individual herbicides drove the toxicity and only two of these overlapped for the two organism groups, algae and macrophytes. The observed exceedance events coincided with seasonal influences, and low rainfall during the 2011 season correlated with a highly reduced number of these events. The major influence was found to be the implementation of the stewardship program, which directed farmers to use more advanced farming techniques, avoid spillages, and other point sources. The number of exceedance events was reduced by more than half for algae (9% of the daily mean samples in 2010 and 4% in 2013) and by approximately 10 times for macrophytes (36% in 2010 to 3% in 2013). This high-resolution monitoring data set illustrates how knowledge of the influencing factors can help reduce unintended exposure to chemicals and achieve real-world improvements. Overall, a single-substance assessment is protective of mixture effects. Where mixture effects do play a role, local measures to manage point sources are more effective than changes to the desk-based environmental risk assessments that focus on diffuse sources. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2023;19:1297-1306. © 2022 Cambridge Environmental Assessments RSK ADAS Ltd and Bayer AG. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).

Historical control data for the interpretation of ecotoxicity data: are we missing a trick?

Wildlife can be exposed to chemicals in the environment from various anthropogenic sources. Ecotoxicity studies, undertaken to address the risks from potential exposure to chemicals, vary in their design e.g. duration of exposure, effect types and endpoints measured. Ecotoxicity studies measure biological responses to test item exposure. Responses can be highly variable, with limited opportunity for control of extrinsic sources of variability. It is critical to distinguish between treatment-related effects and background 'normal variability' when interpreting results. Historical control data (HCD) can be a valuable tool in contextualising results from single studies against previous studies performed under similar conditions. This paper discusses the case for better use of HCD in ecotoxicology assessments, illustrating with case studies the value and difficulties of using HCD in interpretation of results of standard and higher-tier study designs. HCD are routinely used in mammalian toxicology for human health assessments, but not directly in ecotoxicology. The possible reasons for this are discussed e.g., different data types, the potential to mask effects, and the lack of guidance. These concerns are real but not insurmountable and we would like to see organisations such as OECD, EFSA and USEPA develop guidance on the principles of HCD collection. Hopefully, this would lead to greater use of HCD and regulatory acceptance. We believe this is not only a scientifically valid approach but also an ethical issue that is in line with societally driven legal mandates to minimise the use of vertebrate testing in chemical regulatory decision making.