Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
Wien Klin Wochenschr ; 132(17-18): 499-505, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32333270

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a frequent cause of mortality and acquired neurological impairment in children. It is hypothesized, that with the adequate treatment of SDH in children and adolescence, excellent clinical and functional outcomes can be achieved. The aim of this study was to present the severity and outcome of traumatic SDH in children and adolescence as well as to analyze differences between patients treated surgically and conservatively. METHODS: In this study 47 infants and children with a subdural hematoma (SDH) were treated between 1992 and 2010 at a single level-one trauma center. Data regarding accident, treatment and outcomes were collected retrospectively. To classify the outcomes the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) scores at hospital discharge and at follow-up visits were used. Severity of SDH was classified according to the Rotterdam score. RESULTS: In total, 47 cases were treated (21 surgically, 26 conservatively), with 10 patients needing delayed surgery. Overall, 89% of the patients were able to leave hospital, 5 patients died, 2 patients (5%) within 24 h, another 2 (5%) after 48 h and 1 (2%) within 7 days. In 25 patients (53%) a good recovery was recorded at the last follow-up visit. Outcome was mainly influenced by the following factors: age, severity of TBI, and neurological status. Overall, in 70% good clinical and neurological outcomes could be achieved. CONCLUSION: The results of this study confirmed that pediatric SDH is a rare, but serious condition. Despite a poor prognosis, most patients could be treated with good outcomes, given that the choice of treatment is correct. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Research registry 2686.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic , Hematoma, Subdural , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/diagnosis , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/therapy , Child , Female , Glasgow Coma Scale , Glasgow Outcome Scale , Hematoma, Subdural/diagnostic imaging , Hematoma, Subdural/therapy , Humans , Infant , Male , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Trauma Centers
2.
J Clin Med ; 8(8)2019 Aug 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31443284

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis is a major cause of knee pain. Conservative therapy resources are limited due to adverse effects. Therefore, alternative non-invasive therapy approaches to reduce pain medications are gaining importance. The current study analyses if electrical auricular acupuncture (EAA) or low frequency modulated electric current therapy (LFMECT) could support analgesic treatment. METHODS: In a randomized pilot trial patients with painful knee OA were treated with EAA (group 1) or LFMECT (group 2) additional to standard pharmacological analgesic treatment. In total 19 female and 10 male patients with a mean age of 59.1 years (standard deviation ± 13.6) and a mean BMI of 28.9 kg/m2 (± 5.2) were included. Patients were randomly assigned to one of the groups stratified for age, gender and BMI. Before starting of the active study period and collecting of the initial data on day 1, all patients received a pharmacological analgesic baseline therapy for one week. At the next study stage patients started their randomly assigned treatment protocol for 42 days and final follow-up was set on day 70. Patients recorded their pain intensity (numerical rating scale; NRS) using a standardized patient diary. The pain free walking time in min was recorded and range of motion was assessed. RESULTS: Rescue medication intake was comparable between both groups on day 42 (p = 0.55) and day 70 (p = 0.35). After the active study period (day 42) pain scores decreased significantly in both groups (group 1 p = 0.02; group 2 p = 0.0006). At follow up median pain scores further decreased in group 1 (p = 0.0002) and remained at a low level in group 2 (p = 0.001). Level of pain decreased in about 50% in both groups and was comparable during the study period. Total mean range of motion (ROM) increased in both groups (group 1 p = 0.0003; group 2 p = 0.02). Group 1 had more improvement of mean total ROM compared to group 2 (p = 0.034). Pain-free walking time increased in both groups and was comparable between both groups (p = 0.31). Any adverse effects due to EAA or LFMECT were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Data of the current study indicates that implementation of EAA or LFMECT seems to be beneficial to reduce knee pain and improve knee function in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

3.
BMC Surg ; 15: 81, 2015 Jul 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26141495

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A surgical glove will protect surgeons and patients only if the glove's integrity remains intact. However, several studies have demonstrated that undetected micro-perforations of surgical gloves are common. Because of the possibility of surgical glove puncture, an antimicrobial surgical glove was developed. The aim of this laboratory based experimental study was to assess the antibacterial efficacy of the interior chlorhexidine-gluconate (CHG)-coat of an antimicrobial synthetic polyisoprene surgical glove by using a standardized microbiological challenge. METHODS: Sixteen healthy adult participants donned one antimicrobial surgical glove and one non-antimicrobial surgical glove randomly allocated to their dominant and non-dominant hand following a crossover design. During a 2-h wear time, participants performed standardized finger and hand movements. Thereafter, the interior surface of excised fingers of the removed gloves was challenged with 8.00 log10 cfu/mL S. aureus (ATCC 6538) or K. pneumoniae (ATCC 4352), respectively. The main outcome measure was the viable mean log10 cfu counts of the two glove groups after 5 min contact with the interior glove's surface. RESULTS: When comparing an antimicrobial glove against an untreated reference glove after 2-h simulated use wear-time, a mean reduction factor of 6.24 log10 (S. aureus) and 6.22 log10 (K. pneumoniae) was achieved after 5 min contact. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that wearing antibacterial gloves on hands does not negatively impact their antibacterial activity after 2-h of wear. This may have a potential benefit for patient safety in case of glove puncture during surgical procedures.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacterial Load/drug effects , Chlorhexidine/analogs & derivatives , Gloves, Surgical/microbiology , Klebsiella pneumoniae/drug effects , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Adult , Chlorhexidine/pharmacology , Cross-Over Studies , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Time Factors
4.
Wien Klin Wochenschr ; 126(13-14): 397-402, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24825597

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: ACL reconstruction with quadruple hamstring graft (HT) as well as bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft (PT) is a frequent procedure in athletes after ACL rupture. Both techniques are reported to provide for satisfying results but only few articles compare both techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective evaluation was performed on 96 patients with isolated ACL rupture undergoing reconstruction with a HT or PT autograft by a single surgeon at our institution. Long time follow-up after five years included the IKDC and KOOS evaluation form as well as clinical assessment (ROM, Lachmann testing, KT-2000). RESULTS: Comparing both methods revealed no significant differences regarding IKDC and KOOS. The KT-2000 arthrometer testing showed a slightly increased mean laxity in the HT group. There were no differences regarding harvest side symptoms comparing HT and PT as well as one and two incision technique. Kneeling pain was significantly less common after HT autograft. HT as well as PT autograft achieve equally good clinical results in athletes at five year follow-up with no significant difference regarding knee stability. Although no difference concerning the harvest site was identified, HT seems to be favorable for patients who work in a kneeling position.


Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Arthroscopy/methods , Athletic Injuries/surgery , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Tendons/transplantation , Adolescent , Adult , Arthrometry, Articular , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Joint Instability/etiology , Male , Prospective Studies , Rupture , Tissue and Organ Harvesting , Transplant Donor Site , Young Adult
5.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 2(1): 27, 2013 Oct 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24119412

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The number of bacteria recovered from a stainless steel coupon after touching a pigskin substrate with an examination glove coated on its outside with polyhexanide (PHMB), as compared to the number of bacteria recovered in the same manner with non-coated control gloves was evaluated. METHODS: Suspensions containing 1 × 109 colony-forming units of 4 clinically relevant bacterial species (Enterococcus faecium ATCC #51559; Escherichia coli ATCC #25922; Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC #4352; and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC #33591) were used to contaminate Gamma-irradiated pigskin substrates. Bacterial recoveries from the pigskin substrate, stainless steel coupons, and each glove swatch were performed. A difference in the bacterial recovery from the stainless steel coupons after touching with coated and uncoated control gloves was measured. RESULTS: For E. faecium, the coated glove showed a reduction of 4.63 log10 cfu recovery, when compared to control gloves. For E. coli, the coated glove showed 5.48 log10 cfu, for K. pneumoniae 5.03 log10 cfu, and for S. aureus 5.72 log10 cfu recovery, when compared to the non-coated control glove. CONCLUSION: An in-vitro experiment designed to mimic cross-contamination of clinically relevant bacteria in a simulated healthcare setting following glove contact with a contaminated biological surface and cross-transfer to a stainless steel surface has demonstrated that an examination glove coated on its outside surface with PHMB was able to reduce bacterial recovery from a contaminated surface by > 4 log10 cfu, compared to a control non-coated examination glove. These elaborated results may encourage further clinical investigation on the clinical impact of an antibacterial examination glove.

6.
Wien Klin Wochenschr ; 125(13-14): 396-401, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23797531

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether different forms of stabilization for open femur fractures can be performed without influencing outcome, in particular infection and delayed unions/nonunions. Although the traditional management of these injuries is external fixation, a trend toward definitive stabilization techniques has evolved in the current literature. METHODS: All open fractures of the femur shaft and the distal femur presenting to our urban Level I trauma center during a 10 year period were reviewed. A total of 40 patients (41 fractures) were initially treated at the above institution within 6 h of injury. All patients underwent emergent wound irrigation, debridement, and antibiothic theraphy. The method of fracture immobilization was left to the discretion of the attending trauma surgent. Study population consited of 12 (29 %) GI, 10 (25 %) GII, and 19 (46 %) GIII fractures. RESULTS: Initially, fracture management was performed with external fixation (EF) 19 (43.2 %), intramedullary nailing (IM) 18 (38.6 %), plating (PL) 3 (6.8 %), screw fixation (SF) 1 (2.3 %) and without treatment 4 (9.1 %). In all, 3 (6.8 %) fractures were complicated by infection, 7 (15.9 %) had implant failure, and 5 (11.4 %) developed delayed union. CONCLUSIONS: Using external fixation in acute fracture treatment for open femur fractures is a safe and effective surgical technique. Based on our results, external fixation might be superior to intramedullary nailing or plating when evaluating outcome parameters and complications.


Subject(s)
External Fixators/statistics & numerical data , Femoral Fractures/epidemiology , Femoral Fractures/therapy , Fractures, Open/epidemiology , Fractures, Open/therapy , Immobilization/statistics & numerical data , Prosthesis-Related Infections/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Austria/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Prosthesis Failure , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
7.
Int J Mol Sci ; 14(5): 10582-90, 2013 May 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23698780

ABSTRACT

A flexible methacrylate powder dressing (Altrazeal®) transforms into a wound contour conforming matrix once in contact with wound exudate. We hypothesised that it may also serve as a drug delivery vehicle for antiseptics. The antimicrobial efficacy and influence on bacterial growth kinetics in combination with three antiseptics was investigated in an in vitro porcine wound model. Standardized in vitro wounds were contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA; ATCC 33591) and divided into six groups: no dressing (negative control), methacrylate dressing alone, and combinations with application of 0.02% Polyhexamethylene Biguanide (PHMB), 0.4% PHMB, 0.1% PHMB + 0.1% betaine, 7.7 mg/mL Povidone-iodine (PVP-iodine), and 0.1% Octenidine-dihydrochloride (OCT) + 2% phenoxyethanol. Bacterial load per gram tissue was measured over five days. The highest reduction was observed with PVP-iodine at 24 h to log10 1.43 cfu/g, followed by OCT at 48 h to log10 2.41 cfu/g. Whilst 0.02% PHMB resulted in a stable bacterial load over 120 h to log10 4.00 cfu/g over 120 h, 0.1% PHMB + 0.1% betaine inhibited growth during the first 48 h, with slightly increasing bacterial numbers up to log10 5.38 cfu/g at 120 h. These results indicate that this flexible methacrylate dressing can be loaded with various antiseptics serving as drug delivery system. Depending on the selected combination, an individually shaped and controlled antibacterial effect may be achieved using the same type of wound dressing.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/pharmacology , Bandages , Biguanides/pharmacology , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Animals , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/administration & dosage , Betaine/administration & dosage , Betaine/pharmacology , Disinfectants/pharmacology , Drug Delivery Systems , Drug Synergism , Ethylene Glycols/administration & dosage , Ethylene Glycols/pharmacology , Imines , Kinetics , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/growth & development , Povidone-Iodine/administration & dosage , Povidone-Iodine/pharmacology , Pyridines/administration & dosage , Pyridines/pharmacology , Swine , Time Factors , Wound Healing/drug effects , Wounds and Injuries/microbiology
8.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 133(7): 921-7, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23568805

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Literature does not provide any reliable comparison between angular stable plate fixation and rigid nail fixation for stabilization of supracondylar periprosthetic femoral fractures. Thus, the purpose of this study was to compare these two implants in clinical practice relating to fracture healing, functional results and treatment-related complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study (level IV), clinical and radiographic records of 86 patients (62 female and 24 male, average age: 75.6) with supracondylar periprosthetic femoral fractures between 1996 and 2010 were analyzed. 48 patients underwent lateral plate fixation by an angular stable plate system (LISS), whereas 38 patients were stabilized by a rigid interlocking nail device. RESULTS: Sixty-four (76 %) patients returned to their pre-injury activity level and were satisfied with their clinical outcome. We had an overall Oxford outcome score of 2.21, with patients following angular stable plate fixation of 2.22, and patients after rigid nail fixation of 2.20. Successful fracture healing within 6 months was achieved in 74 (88 %) patients. Comparing between plate fixation and nail fixation, statistical analysis did not reveal any significant differences. Overall, we had a relatively high rate of fracture healing and a satisfactory functional outcome with both implants. Both methods of fixation showed similar results relating to the functional outcome and individual satisfaction of the patients. However, with regards to fracture healing and treatment-related complications, intramedullary nail fixation showed slight advantages.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Bone Nails , Bone Plates , Femoral Fractures/surgery , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Periprosthetic Fractures/surgery , Aged , Female , Femoral Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation , Humans , Male , Periprosthetic Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Postoperative Complications , Radiography , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
9.
Neurosurgery ; 70(3): 676-82; discussion 682-3, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22343791

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Type II odontoid fractures with additional chip fragments are rare in clinical practice, accounting for < 10% of all odontoid fractures. Hadley et al were the first to describe these fractures as an individual subtype (IIA). OBJECTIVE: To analyze the outcome of patients after surgical or nonoperative treatment of Hadley type IIA odontoid fractures. METHODS: We analyzed the records of 46 patients at an average of 64 years of age at the time of injury. Twenty-five patients underwent surgical stabilization by anterior screw fixation and were entered into study group A; 21 patients were treated nonoperatively by halo vest immobilization and included in study group B. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients (84%) returned to their preinjury activity level and were satisfied with their treatment. Using the Cervical Spine Outcomes Questionnaire to quantify the clinical outcome, we had an overall outcome score of 21.8. We did not find a significant difference in the overall clinical outcome between study groups. Bony fusion was achieved in 35 patients (80%). We had a nonunion rate of 13% after anterior screw fixation and a significantly higher rate of 30% after halo vest immobilization. Failure of reduction or fixation occurred in 12 patients (27%), with a significantly higher failure rate after halo vest immobilization. CONCLUSION: Hadley type IIA odontoid fractures are inherently unstable and impede proper realignment. These fractures have a significantly increased risk for secondary loss of reduction and bony nonunion, particularly after nonoperative management. Early surgery should be considered to avoid further complications.


Subject(s)
External Fixators/statistics & numerical data , Odontoid Process/injuries , Odontoid Process/surgery , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Spinal Fractures/therapy , Spinal Fusion/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Screws , Databases, Factual/statistics & numerical data , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Morbidity , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , Spinal Fractures/mortality , Spinal Fusion/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
10.
Injury ; 42(11): 1219-25, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21176899

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Interprosthetic femoral fractures following ipsilateral hip and knee arthroplasty are a rare but serious complication in clinical practice. In most cases, adequate management of these injuries might constitute a challenging problem. However, the literature provides only few data regarding the treatment and outcome of interprosthetic femoral fractures, and there are only few classifications available, which might assist in finding an appropriate treatment concept. The purpose of this study was to analyse our experience in the management of interprosthetic femoral fractures following ipsilateral hip and knee joint replacement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the clinical and radiographic records of 23 patients (15 female and eight male, average age: 79.2 years) with an interprosthetic fracture after ipsilateral hip and knee joint replacement between 1992 and 2008. For the classification of interprosthetic femoral fractures, the fractures were divided into three types, depending on the fracture site and the adjacency to the prostheses. All patients underwent operative stabilisation, either by lateral plate fixation (n=19), by revision arthroplasty using a long stem (n=2) or by plate fixation and revision arthroplasty (n=2). RESULTS: Referring to the clinical outcome, 16 patients returned to their pre-injury activity level and were satisfied with their clinical outcome. In six patients, we saw a relevant decrease of hip or knee function and severe limitations in gait and activities of daily living. We had a mean Harris Hip Score (HHS) of 78.4 points, and a mean Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) of 71.8 points. Relating to the radiographic outcome, successful fracture healing was achieved in 19 of 22 patients (86%) within 6 months. Failures of reduction and fixation were noted in four (18%) of 22 patients. CONCLUSION: We had a satisfactory outcome following individualised treatment of interprosthetic femoral fractures following ipsilateral hip and knee joint replacement. Compared to the rare data in current literature, we had promising functional result and high rate of bony fusion. Regarding the complexity and challenges in many of these cases, interprosthetic fractures require an adequate analysis of the fracture aetiology and a suitable transfer into the best possible treatment concept.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Femoral Fractures/surgery , Fracture Healing/physiology , Periprosthetic Fractures/surgery , Postoperative Complications , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Bone Plates , Female , Femoral Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Femoral Fractures/epidemiology , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Periprosthetic Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Periprosthetic Fractures/epidemiology , Prosthesis Failure , Radiography , Recovery of Function , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
11.
J Trauma ; 68(6): 1464-70, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20539190

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The incidence of periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty is continuously rising because of an increasing number of knee joint replacements and an enhanced survivorship of the elderly population after knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to analyze the practicability and effectiveness of the various treatment methods for management of periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty, and to determine the clinical and radiographic long-term results of patients following surgical and nonoperative treatment of these injuries. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical and radiographic records of 41 patients (31 women and 10 men; average age, 78.6 years) with periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty between 1992 and 2008. Thirty-seven patients showed a periprosthetic fracture of the distal femur, and four patients had a periprosthetic proximal tibial fracture. Thirty-six patients underwent operative stabilization by plate fixation (n = 18), intramedullary nailing (n = 15) or revision arthroplasty (n = 3), and five patients were treated nonoperatively by long-term cast immobilization. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients returned to their preinjury activity level and were satisfied with their clinical outcome. In 10 patients, we saw a relevant decrease of knee function and severe limitations in gait and activities of daily living. Three patients died related to surgery. Successful fracture healing within 6 months was achieved in 33 (87%) of 38 patients. Failures of reduction or fixation occurred in 8 (21%) of 38 patients. Reoperation due to technical failures was necessary in three patients. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with current data in literature, we had a satisfactory outcome in following individualized treatment of periprosthetic fractures after knee joint replacement. Referring to the wide field of treatment options and high rates of complications, periprosthetic femoral fractures around the knee commonly constitute a challenging problem for the treating surgeons and require an adequate analysis of fracture etiology and a corresponding transfer into an individual treatment concept.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Femoral Fractures/therapy , Fracture Fixation/methods , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Tibial Fractures/therapy , Activities of Daily Living , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Nails , Bone Plates , Casts, Surgical , Female , Femoral Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Radiography , Range of Motion, Articular , Recovery of Function , Reoperation , Risk Factors , Tibial Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Treatment Outcome
12.
Neurosurgery ; 64(4): 726-33; discussion 733, 2009 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19349830

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Surgical treatment of odontoid fractures that do not allow interfragmentary fracture compression involves either posterior atlantoaxial arthrodesis or additional anterior stabilization using a plate construct. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical and radiographic outcome after anterior plate fixation of odontoid fractures that were not suitable for anterior screw fixation. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical and radiographic records of 9 patients with an average age of 54 years at the time of surgery who had undergone anterior plate fixation of an odontoid fracture. Indications for using a plate construct were odontoid fractures with anterior oblique fracture lines, fractures with comminution or major displacement, and pathological fractures. RESULTS: Eight patients returned to their preinjury activity level and were satisfied with their treatment. One patient reported chronic pain symptoms and a notable decrease in cervical spine motion. Using the Smiley-Webster Scale to quantify their clinical outcome, we achieved an overall outcome score of 1.6. Bony fusion was achieved in all patients. Reduction or fixation failed in 2 patients. Reoperation for technical failures was not necessary in any of the patients. CONCLUSION: We had promising results using anterior plate fixation for surgical treatment of odontoid fractures that did not allow interfragmentary fracture compression. Because this method avoids the rigid fixation of the atlantoaxial joint in contrast to techniques of posterior cervical arthrodesis, it seems to be a practical option for the management of fracture types that require additional stabilization of the odontoid.


Subject(s)
Arthrodesis/methods , Bone Plates , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Activities of Daily Living , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arthrodesis/instrumentation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neurologic Examination , Odontoid Process/surgery , Radiography , Severity of Illness Index , Spinal Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Fractures/physiopathology , Time Factors , Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
13.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 89(8): 1716-22, 2007 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17671009

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A dens fracture is the most common cervical fracture in elderly patients. The purposes of this study were to analyze the functional and radiographic results after surgical treatment of dens fractures in patients over sixty-five years of age and to compare the two methods that were used for operative treatment. METHODS: We reviewed the cases of fifty-six patients, with an average age of 71.4 years at the time of surgery, who had undergone surgical treatment of a dens fracture from 1988 to 2002. Thirty-seven fractures were stabilized with anterior screw fixation, and nineteen fractures had posterior cervical arthrodesis. RESULTS: Forty-five patients returned to their preinjury activity level and were satisfied with their treatment. Thirty-five patients had a full range of neck movement, and forty-seven patients were free of pain. Technical failures occurred in eight patients. The thirty-seven patients treated with anterior screw fixation had a good clinical outcome, with fracture-healing in thirty-three patients (89%) and technical failure in five patients (14%). All nineteen patients treated with posterior cervical arthrodesis had fracture union, with technical failure in three patients, but the functional results were worse than those after anterior screw fixation. With the inclusion of the six patients who had been excluded from the clinical and radiographic review, the overall morbidity rate was 16% (ten of sixty-two patients) and the overall mortality rate was 6% (four of sixty-two patients). CONCLUSIONS: A satisfactory outcome can be achieved with surgical treatment of a dens fracture in geriatric patients. It appears that anterior screw fixation may maintain better mobility of the cervical spine, but it appears to be associated with a higher rate of fracture nonunion and a greater potential for reoperation.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Activities of Daily Living , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Screws , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications , Radiography , Recovery of Function , Spinal Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...