Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 468(2): 555-64, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19830504

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: The surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement has become more common, yet the strength of clinical evidence to support this surgery is debated. We performed a systematic review of the literature to (1) define the level of evidence regarding hip impingement surgery; (2) determine whether the surgery relieves pain and improves function; (3) identify the complications; and (4) identify modifiable causes of failure (conversion to total hip arthroplasty). We searched the literature between 1950 and 2009 for all studies reporting on surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Studies with clinical outcome data and minimum two year followup were analyzed. Eleven studies met our criteria for inclusion. Nine were Level IV and two were Level III. Mean followup was 3.2 years; range (2-5.2 years). Reduced pain and improvement in hip function were reported in all studies. Conversion to THA was reported in 0% to 26% of cases. Major complications occurred in 0% to 18% of the procedures. Current evidence regarding femoroacetabular impingement surgery is primarily Level IV and suggests the various surgical techniques are associated with pain relief and improved function in 68-96% of patients over short-term followup. Long-term followup is needed to determine survivorship and impact on osteoarthritis progression and natural history. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Subject(s)
Acetabulum/surgery , Femur/surgery , Hip Joint/surgery , Orthopedic Procedures , Osteoarthritis, Hip/surgery , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Disease Progression , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Hip Joint/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Orthopedic Procedures/adverse effects , Osteoarthritis, Hip/etiology , Osteoarthritis, Hip/physiopathology , Pain/etiology , Pain/prevention & control , Pain Measurement , Recovery of Function , Reoperation , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
2.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 467(9): 2221-7, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19333669

ABSTRACT

Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is an effective acetabular reorientation technique for treatment of symptomatic acetabular dysplasia. In hips with severe deformities, an adjunctive femoral osteotomy (PFO) may optimize correction, joint stability, and congruency. We analyzed the clinical and radiographic results of combined PAO/PFO in treating severe hip deformities. Second, we compared the clinical results of patients treated with PAO/PFO with patients treated with isolated PAO for lesser deformities. Twenty-five patients (28 hips) treated with PAO/PFO were reviewed and followed a minimum of 16 months (mean, 44 months). The matched PAO cohort included 25 patients (28 hips). For the PAO/PFO group, the average Harris hip score improved from 60.9 to 86.3. Eighty-nine percent of the patients demonstrated at least a 10-point improvement in the hip score and 75% had a Harris hip score over 80 points. Radiographic evaluation demonstrated consistent deformity correction. The PAO/PFO group had a lower average Harris hip score preoperatively, yet hip function after surgery was comparable between groups. These data indicate combined PAO/PFO is associated with improved hip function in most patients. These clinical results are comparable to those obtained with isolated PAO for lesser hip deformities.


Subject(s)
Acetabulum , Femur/surgery , Hip Dislocation, Congenital/surgery , Osteotomy/methods , Acetabulum/abnormalities , Acetabulum/diagnostic imaging , Acetabulum/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Cohort Studies , Female , Hip Dislocation, Congenital/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Pain/etiology , Pain/physiopathology , Postoperative Complications , Radiography , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Young Adult
3.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 467(8): 2041-52, 2009 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19381741

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: The Bernese periacetabular osteotomy is commonly used to treat symptomatic acetabular dysplasia. Although periacetabular osteotomy is becoming a more common surgical intervention to relieve pain and improve function, the strength of clinical evidence to support this procedure for these goals is not well defined in the literature. We therefore performed a systematic review of the literature to define the level of evidence for periacetabular osteotomy, to determine deformity correction, clinical results, and to determine complications associated with the procedure. Thirteen studies met our inclusion criteria. Eleven studies were Level IV, one was Level III, and one was Level II. Radiographic deformity correction was consistent and improvement in hip function was noted in all studies. Most studies did not correlate radiographic and clinic outcomes. Clinical failures were commonly associated with moderate to severe preoperative osteoarthritis and conversion to THA was reported in 0% to 17% of cases. Major complications were noted in 6% to 37% of the procedures. These data indicate periacetabular osteotomy provides pain relief and improved hip function in most patients over short- to midterm followup. The current evidence is primarily Level IV. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Subject(s)
Osteotomy/methods , Acetabulum , Humans , Osteotomy/adverse effects
4.
Health Care Manag Sci ; 10(2): 139-49, 2007 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17608055

ABSTRACT

The development of patient safety culture in health care organizations is a necessary precursor to patient safety improvement. However, existing tools to measure patient safety culture are intended for implementation in hospitals. A new, abbreviated patient safety culture survey was developed for use in ambulatory health care settings. This survey was tested for content validity utilizing a panel of six experts. It had a clarity interrater agreement (IR) of 0.75, a clarity content validity index (CVI) of 0.95, a representativeness IR of 0.75 and a representativeness CVI of 0.95. The content validity analysis served as a useful tool for assessing the relevance and comprehensiveness of this survey of patient safety culture in ambulatory care organizations.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/standards , Safety , Ambulatory Care/organization & administration , Communication , Data Collection/methods , Humans , Risk Management
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...