Correction to: Exploring how medical students learn with the help of a digital presentation: a qualitative study.

Following publication of the original article [1], the author reported that Table 3 was given the incorrect heading.

Exploring how medical students learn with the help of a digital presentation: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: The web-based presentation software Prezi was used to create a digital presentation in order to facilitate antibiotic knowledge in an undergraduate course on infectious diseases in the Karolinska Institutet Medical Programme. It was unclear how the students used this in their learning, and there is a lack of research on using Prezi presentations in higher education, as well as on learner-content interaction in blended learning in general. METHODS: A qualitative study design was used for an in-depth exploration of the students' experiences of using the presentation in their studies. Students were interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Two main themes emerged from the analysis. Firstly, the students experienced that they own their learning: the presentation provided flexibility in studying and increased engagement in the learning process. Secondly, the presentation was part of a superficial learning process: students saw it as a complement to other educational activities, but expressed that there was an absence of pedagogical encounters which prevented the information in the presentation to be placed in a larger context. CONCLUSIONS: The Prezi presentation when used as an e-learning tool was a useful part of and a complement to blended learning in medical education but cannot replace face-to-face learning situations, especially not when the content of the course is complex, such as in the case of antibiotics. The learning objectives should be connected to a learning theory and made explicit for the students. Students should receive instructions and support during the course on how to use new e-learning tools. Continuous pedagogical interaction with feedback and reflection between students, teachers, and patients should be provided to enhance deep learning.

Higher risk of renal disease in chronic hepatitis C patients: Antiviral therapy survival benefit in patients on hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Several studies have shown that chronic hepatitis C (CHC) infection has a negative impact on kidney function, as well as survival, in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) or on hemodialysis. The aim of this nationwide registry study was to describe renal disease in Swedish patients with CHC. METHODS: In the present study, patients were identified for CHC (B18.2) and CKD (N18) according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 in the nationwide Swedish inpatient care day surgery (1997-2013) and non-primary outpatient care (2001-2013) patient registries. Hemodialysis was defined using the procedure code in the non-primary outpatient care. For each patient, up to five non-CHC diagnosed age/sex/place of residency-matched comparators were drawn from the general population at the time of diagnosis. Follow-up started at the date of CHC diagnosis and patients accrued person-time until, whichever came first, death, emigration or December 31st, 2013. RESULTS: Between 2001 and 2013, 42,522 patients received a CHC diagnosis. Of these patients, 2.5% (1,077/45,222) were diagnosed with CKD during 280,123 person-years, compared with 0.7% (1,454/202,694) in the matched general population comparators (1,504,765 person-years), resulting in a standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of 4.0. There was a 3.3-7.0-fold risk of patients with CHC requiring hemodialysis. Overall, 17% of patients with CHC receiving hemodialysis were treated for CHC; 24% in the treated cohort died compared with 56% of the untreated cohort (p <0.0001), with antiviral treatment improving survival with an odds ratio of 3.901 (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results from this nationwide registry study showed that patients with CHC are at a higher risk of developing CKD. Furthermore, hepatitis C treatment seemed to improve survival for patients with CHC on hemodialysis compared with untreated patients. LAY SUMMARY: Hepatitis C is an infectious disease that mainly infects the liver, but has also been shown to have negative effects on other organs. This nationwide study demonstrates an increased risk of hepatitis C patients developing reduced kidney function and the need for dialysis. The study also showed improved survival in dialysis patients who received antiviral treatment.

High-Dose Ribavirin Enhances Early Virological Response in Hepatitis C Genotype 1-Infected Patients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to investigate whether patients with a previous nonresponse to standard of care treatment with ribavirin dosed according to body weight would respond to a high individualized dose of concentration-monitored ribavirin. METHODS: Previous nonresponders to standard of care treatment with peginterferon (peg-IFN) and ribavirin were included. Ribavirin was dosed aiming at a plasma concentration of >15 µmol/L. The initial ribavirin dose was calculated from a formula based on renal function and body weight. Erythropoietin treatment was started 2 weeks before antiviral therapy. RESULTS: Twenty patients (16 men and 4 women) with a mean age of 52 years were included. Sixty percent had advanced fibrosis. Eighty percent of patients achieved an early viral response, and 60% were negative for hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) at treatment week 24. High-dose ribavirin resulted in a significantly increased HCV RNA drop at week 12 (mean: 3.13 versus 2.05 IU/mL; P < 0.001). Nine patients were negative for HCV RNA at the end of treatment, and 1 achieved sustained viral response. The final steady-state daily dose of ribavirin varied from 1400 to 4400 mg. Hemoglobin levels decreased during treatment, mean Hb 163, 134, and 110 g/L at week 0, 4, and 12, respectively. Two patients received blood transfusions. No other severe adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: An individualized high ribavirin dose resulted in a more pronounced early viral HCV RNA decline than a standard-dose ribavirin scheme. This regime is safe provided that close monitoring of anemia is undertaken and that treatment with erythropoietin is given.

High-dose ribavirin in combination with standard dose peginterferon for treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Improved treatment regimens for patients with chronic hepatitis C, genotype 1 and high viral load are needed. Increasing the dose of ribavirin has increased the response rate, but experience with doses of more than 1,200 mg/day is limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and tolerance to treatment with a high and individualized dose of ribavirin in combination with peginterferon. Ten patients with chronic hepatitis C, genotype 1 and high viral load were treated with peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin for 48 weeks in a prospective trial. The initial ribavirin dose was individualized and calculated from a pharmacokinetic formula based mainly on renal function. Ribavirin plasma concentrations were monitored, and the dose was adjusted to reach the target concentration. Hemoglobin was monitored, and patients were treated with erythropoietin and blood transfusions when indicated. After dose adjustments, the mean dose of ribavirin was 2,540 mg/day (range, 1,600-3,600) at week 24. The main side effect was anemia, which was controlled with erythropoietin. Two patients required blood transfusions. One patient was withdrawn at week 24 because of a lack of viral response, and one patient at week 39 because of side effects, primarily interferon associated. At follow-up (>or=24 weeks posttreatment), nine of ten patients had undetectable HCV RNA and thus were cured by standard definitions. In conclusion, a high dose of ribavirin according to an individualized schedule is feasible but associated with more frequent and serious side effects such as anemia. The viral response merits further evaluation.

Interferon and ribavirin treatment in patients with hepatitis C-associated renal disease and renal insufficiency.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with renal manifestations, such as membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) with or without cryoglobulinaemia, membranous glomerulonephritis (MGN) and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). Standard treatment for HCV is interferon and ribavirin, but in renal insufficiency ribavirin has been contraindicated due to fear of side effects. METHODS: Seven patients, two with cryoglobulinaemia, vasculitic manifestations and glomerulonephritis (GN), four with MPGN and one with FSGS were treated with a combination of interferon and ribavirin. Two patients were given pegylated interferon and ribavirin. All patients had at presentation renal insufficiency, with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) between 10 and 65 ml/min. One patient had HCV genotype 1, the remainder 2 and 3. Duration of therapy was according to genotype (6-12 months). Ribavirin in plasma was monitored by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to avoid over-dosing, aiming at a target concentration of 10-15 micromol/l. The main side effect of ribavirin, haemolytic anaemia, was monitored closely with haemoglobin controls. RESULTS: Six of seven patients became HCV-RNA-PCR negative and four of seven have maintained both virological and renal remission. One of seven has maintained virological and partial renal remission. One patient did not tolerate interferon, but is in renal remission with low-dose ribavirin. One vasculitis patient responded with complete remission, but relapsed virologically and had a minor vasculitic flare after 9 months. Only one patient with vasculitis had low-dose immunosuppression in addition to anti-viral therapy. Average daily ribavirin dose was 200-800 mg. Ribavirin-induced anaemia was managed in five of seven patients with low-dose iron and erythropoietin between 4000 and 20 000 IU/week. CONCLUSIONS: Interferon and ribavirin can with reasonable safety be used in HCV-related vasculitis and GN irrespective of renal function.

Follow-up of antiretroviral treatment in liver transplant recipients with primary and chronic HIV type 1 infection.

The prognosis of HIV-1-infected patients has dramatically improved but progression to liver failure occurs now frequently in subjects coinfected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). This has raised the issue of organ transplantation, but the knowledge about the effect of concomitant antiretroviral and immunosuppressive therapy is limited. The objective of the study was to describe viral and immunological events in antiretroviral-treated orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients with primary (PHI) or chronic HIV-1 infection. Three HIV-1-infected patients with liver cirrhosis due to chronic HCV infection underwent OLT. A fourth patient developed PHI at OLT. Immunosuppressive drugs and combination antiretroviral therapy were given. The effects on HIV-1 load, viral diversity and divergence, and CD4(+) T cell counts, were studied. One patient died after 3 months. Three subjects were alive after 9 months, 14 months, and 3 years, respectively. In the PHI patient, viral load decreased during the second week of illness despite immunosuppression. During the third week the viremia increased until antiretroviral treatment was initiated. In all four patients, the HIV-1 replication was effectively inhibited during follow-up by the treatment, as determined by undetectable plasma viremia, lack of viral sequence changes, and increase in CD4(+) T cells. The pattern of viral dynamics may suggest that the innate immunity causes the earliest decline of viral load in PHI patients. A lack of adaptive immunity may thereafter lead to an increase in viremia in heavily immunosuppressed individuals. However, a specific HIV-1 immunity is not necessary to efficiently inhibit the viral replication when potent antiretroviral therapy is given in liver transplant recipients with primary or chronic HIV-1 infection.

Dosage of ribavirin in patients with hepatitis C should be based on renal function: a population pharmacokinetic analysis.

A combination of interferon alfa and ribavirin is standard therapy for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). Ribavirin dosage is currently based on body weight. The aim of this study was to critically evaluate current dosage recommendations on the basis of a population pharmacokinetic analysis. The data consisted of 383 ribavirin plasma concentration samples collected from 63 patients undergoing treatment of HCV. Forty-four patients had normal range serum creatinine with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR = estimated creatinine clearance) of 57-144 mL/min. Another 19 patients had renal impairment with a GFR of 5-57 mL/min. Population factors were age, gender, body weight, serum creatinine, and GFR. A population pharmacokinetic analysis with a two-compartment model was carried out using nonlinear mixed effect modeling. Ribavirin clearance was found to be linearly dependent on renal function with a small nonrenal clearance dependent on body weight and age. Estimated GFR was a significantly better predictor of ribavirin clearance than body weight alone. There remained a significant 40% interindividual variability in ribavirin total clearance not explained by estimated GFR and body weight. The volume of distribution was large and proportional to body weight (V = 44.3 x body weight), which resulted in a long half-life (100-500 hours, depending on GFR) and a long time to steady state (3-12 weeks). Ribavirin dosage should mainly be based on renal function and not, as currently recommended, on body weight alone. A ribavirin-dosing schedule based on GFR and body weight to reach an intended target concentration is proposed. Ribavirin monitoring may be useful for optimizing HCV treatment not only in patients with renal insufficiency but also in other patients considering the time to steady state and the interindividual variability in ribavirin clearance.