Early Initiation of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy for Heart Failure After Cardiac Surgery.

There is an evolving role for guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in managing heart failure with reduced ejection fraction after cardiac surgery. GDMT is based on the use of pharmacologic agents from each of 4 distinct drug classes, also known as the 4 pillars of heart failure therapy: ß-blockers, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, often paired with neprilysin inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors. Despite the demonstrated benefits of GDMT in reducing mortality and hospitalization rates in the nonsurgical literature, there is conspicuous underuse of GDMT after cardiac surgery. The lack of published literature and practical challenges surrounding the timing for initiation of GDMT in the immediate postoperative period has limited standardized implementation strategies. A multidisciplinary approach will be necessary to assist in initiating, titrating, and monitoring the response to these therapies in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction after cardiac surgery.

Sequencing Quadruple Therapy for Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: Does It Really Matter?

The conventional sequence of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) initiation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) assumes that the effectiveness and tolerability of GDMT agents mirror their order of discovery, which is not true. In this review, the authors discuss flexible GDMT sequencing that should be permitted in special populations, such as patients with bradycardia, chronic kidney disease, or atrial fibrillation. Moreover, the initiation of certain GDMT medications may enable tolerance of other GDMT medications. Most importantly, the achievement of partial doses of all four pillars of GDMT is better than achievement of target dosing of only a couple.

Illness Perception and the Impact of a Definitive Diagnosis on Women With Ischemia and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: A Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: Ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA) disproportionately impacts women, yet the underlying pathologies are often not distinguished, contributing to adverse health care experiences and poor quality of life. Coronary function testing at the time of invasive coronary angiography allows for improved diagnostic accuracy. Despite increased recognition of INOCA and expanding access to testing, data lack on first-person perspectives and the impact of receiving a diagnosis in women with INOCA. METHODS: From 2020 to 2021, we conducted structured telephone interviews with 2 groups of women with INOCA who underwent invasive coronary angiography (n=29) at Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT: 1 group underwent coronary function testing (n=20, of whom 18 received a mechanism-based diagnosis) and the other group who did not undergo coronary function testing (n=9). The interviews were analyzed using the constant comparison method by a multidisciplinary team. RESULTS: The mean age was 59.7 years, and 79% and 3% were non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic Black, respectively. Through iterative coding, 4 themes emerged and were further separated into subthemes that highlight disease experience aspects to be addressed in patient care: (1) distress from symptoms of uncertain cause: symptom constellation, struggle for sensemaking, emotional toll, threat to personal and professional identity; (2) a long journey to reach a definitive diagnosis: self-advocacy and fortitude, healthcare interactions brought about further uncertainty and trauma, therapeutic alliance, sources of information; (3) establishing a diagnosis enabled a path forward: relief and validation, empowerment; and (4) commitment to promoting awareness and supporting other women: recognition of sex and racial/ethnic disparities, support for other women. CONCLUSIONS: Insights about how women experience the symptoms of INOCA and their interactions with clinicians and the healthcare system hold powerful lessons for more patient-centered care. A coronary function testing-informed diagnosis greatly influences the healthcare experiences, quality of life, and emotional states of women with INOCA.

Bilateral internal thoracic artery versus radial artery multi-arterial bypass grafting: a report from the STS database†.

OBJECTIVES: Multi-arterial bypass grafting with bilateral internal thoracic (BITA-MABG) or radial (RA-MABG) arteries improves long-term survival, but its increased complexity raises perioperative safety concerns. We compared perioperative outcomes of RA-MABG and BITA-MABG using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (STS-ACSD). METHODS: We analysed the 2004-2015 BITA-MABG and RA-MABG experience in STS-ACSD. Primary end points were operative mortality (OM) and deep sternal wound infections (DSWI). Risk-adjusted odds ratios [AOR (95% confidence interval)] were derived via multivariable logistic regression. Sensitivity analyses were done in patient sub-cohorts and based on institutional BITA-utilization rates (<5%, 5-10%, 10-20%, 20-40% and >40%). RESULTS: Eighty-five thousand nine hundred five RA-MABG (82.5% men; 61 years) and 61 336 BITA-MABG (85.1% men; 59 years) patients were analysed; 41.6% of BITA-MABG and 27.3% of RA-MABG cases came from institutions with low MABG utilization rates (<10%). Unadjusted OM was equivalent for both techniques (BITA-MABG versus RA-MABG: 1.3% vs 1.2%, P = 0.79), while DSWI was lower for RA-MABG (1.0% vs 0.6%, P < 0.001). RA-MABG was associated with lower adjusted OM [AOR = 0.80 (0.69-0.96)] and DSWI [AOR = 0.39 (0.32-0.46)]. Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness of these findings. Equivalent outcomes were observed at high BITA-use institutions where BITA cases comprised >20% of all cases for OM and ≥40% for DSWI. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of the STS-ACSD showed that RA-MABG is a generally safer form of multi-arterial coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. However, this advantage is mitigated at institutions with substantial BITA experience.

Gender-related outcomes after open repair of descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: Female sex has been associated with greater morbidity and mortality for a variety of major cardiovascular procedures. We sought to determine the influence of female sex on early and late outcomes after open descending thoracic aortic aneurysm (DTA) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair. METHODS: We searched our aortic surgery database to identify patients having open DTA or TAAA repair. Logistic regression and Cox regression analyses were used to assess the effect of sex on perioperative and long-term outcomes. RESULTS: From 1997 until 2017, there were 783 patients who underwent DTA or TAAA repair. There were 462 male patients and 321 female patients. Female patients were significantly older (67.6 ± 13.9 years vs 62.6 ± 14.7 years; P < .001), had more chronic pulmonary disease (47.0% vs 35.7%; P = .001) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second <50% (28.3% vs 18.2%; P < .001), and were more likely to have degenerative aneurysms (61.7% vs 41.6%; P < .001). Operative mortality was not different between women and men (5.6% vs 6.2%; P = .536). However, women were more likely to require a tracheostomy after surgery (10.6% vs 5.0%; P = .003) despite a reduced incidence of left recurrent nerve palsy (3.4% vs 7.8%; P = .012). Logistic regression found female sex to be an independent risk factor for a composite of major adverse events (odds ratio, 2.68; confidence interval, 1.41-5.11) and need for tracheostomy (odds ratio, 3.73; confidence interval, 1.53-9.10). Women also had significantly lower 5-year survival. CONCLUSIONS: Women undergoing open DTA or TAAA repair are not at greater risk for operative mortality than their male counterparts are. Reduced preoperative pulmonary function may contribute to an increased risk for respiratory failure in the perioperative period.

A 20-Year Experience With Resection of Primary Cardiac Tumors and Metastatic Tumors of the Heart.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac tumors are uncommon, occurring in less than 1% of the population, and are comprised of numerous tumor types. Management of certain tumors types such as sarcoma have evolved and improved in the recent era. We evaluate the outcomes of patients who underwent resection of benign or malignant cardiac tumors with a focused review of cardiac sarcomas. METHODS: Institutional data were reviewed from 1997 to 2017, and 180 patients who underwent tumor resection were identified. Outcomes and survival were examined based on tumor type. RESULTS: Two-thirds of patients (119 of 180) had benign tumors. Of 61 malignant tumors, 23 were sarcomas, 24 were cavoatrial tumors, and 8 were T4 lung tumors. In the sarcoma group, operative mortality was 2 of 23 (9.1%). Neoadjuvant therapy was administered to 8 of 23 patients (34.8%) with R0 resection achieved in 5 of 8 patients (62.5%). R0 resection was successful in 7 of 15 patients (46.7%) without neoadjuvant therapy. Mean survival with neoadjuvant therapy was 2.76 ± 3.85 years versus 1.28 ± 1.31 years without neoadjuvant therapy (p = 0.428). Mean survival with R0 resection was 2.79 ± 4.23 years compared with 1.64 ± 1.63 years without (p = 0.407). In the T4 lung tumor group, operative mortality was zero and R0 resection was achieved in 6 of 8 (75%). The cavoatrial tumors were mostly renal cell carcinoma resected with a mortality of 4.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac tumors are comprised of diverse tumor types. Indications for, and benefits of, resecting benign tumors and many malignant tumor types are clear, and operative outcomes are generally good. Cardiac sarcomas benefit from neoadjuvant therapy, which improves the rate of complete resection, thus improving survival.

Editor's Choice - Aortic Re-operation After Replacement of the Proximal Aorta: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: The aim was to estimate risk of aortic re-operation, and re-operative morbidity and mortality, following replacement of the proximal aorta for aneurysm or dissection. METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement and the Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. A comprehensive literature review was performed to identify all articles reporting aortic re-operation after proximal aortic replacement. The proximal aorta was defined as extending to the origin of the brachiocephalic trunk. The incidence rate for aortic re-operation (IRAR) was calculated, and stratified based on presence/absence of connective tissue disorders, as well as initial surgical indication. Pooled in hospital mortality and post-operative complication rates were estimated. RESULTS: In total, 7821 patients who underwent proximal aortic replacement from 47 studies were included: 8.3% (n = 649) had Marfan syndrome (MS). During a weighted mean follow up of 4.7 ± 0.3 years, 11.5% (n = 903) underwent aortic re-operation. Mean weighted time between initial surgery and re-operation was 5.2 ± 0.2 years. IRAR was 2.4% per person-year (PPY) (confidence interval [CI] 2.1-2.8%). Patients with MFS had a threefold higher IRAR (6.0% PPY, CI 4.1-8.8%) than did patients without a connective tissue disorders (2.3% PPY, CI 1.9-2.7%; p < .001). IRAR was 2.5% PPY (CI 2.1-3.0%) after operation for dissection and 1.3% PPY (CI 0.9-2.0%) after operation for aneurysm (p = .004 for subgroup differences). IRAR proximal and distal to the left subclavian artery was 1.2% PPY (CI 1.0-1.5%) and 1.3% PPY (CI 1.1-1.6%), respectively. The pooled in hospital mortality and complication rates after re-operation were 14.31% (CI 11.28-17.99%) and 18.08% (CI 10.54-29.25%), respectively. On meta-regression, initial operation for dissection was the only significant predictor of aortic re-operation (beta = .030, p = .001). CONCLUSION: Aortic re-operation occurs at a mean rate of 2.4% per person-year in the five years after proximal aortic replacement and is strongly associated with initial operation for dissection.

Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass surgery: A meta-analysis of the current evidence.

BACKGROUND: Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass (TECAB) has emerged as an alternative to other minimally invasive techniques. However, limited TECAB results are available to date. The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the existing literature to give an objective estimate of the outcomes of TECAB using a meta-analytical approach. METHODS: A comprehensive online review was performed in Ovid MEDLINE®, Ovid EMBASE and The Cochrane Library from 2000 to July 2017. Eligible studies included single arm TECAB studies as well as comparative studies (TECAB vs minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB)). Pooled event rates and odds ratios (ORs) for operative mortality, perioperative myocardial infarction (MI), perioperative stroke, graft patency and repeat revascularization were estimated. Single arm and pairwise comparisons were performed. RESULTS: Seventeen single arm TECAB articles (3721 patients, weighted mean follow-up 3.3years) were included. The pooled event rate was 0.80% (95%CI: 0.60-1.2%) for operative mortality, 2.28% (95%CI: 1.7-3%) for perioperative MI, 1.50% (95%CI: 1.1-2.0%) for perioperative stroke, 2.99% (95%CI: 1.6-5.4%) for repeat revascularization and 94.8% (95%CI: 89.3-97.5%) for early graft patency (weighted mean follow-up 10.1months). On pairwise meta-analysis 376 patients (263 TECAB and 113 MIDCAB) were included. No difference in operative mortality (OR=0.25, 95%CI: 0.02-2.83), perioperative MI (OR=3.09, 95%CI: 0.37-26.12) or perioperative stroke (OR=1.33, 95%CI: 0.17-10.26) was found between the two techniques. CONCLUSIONS: TECAB has an acceptably low operative risk and a good early patency rate. The incidence of perioperative MI requires further investigation. The dearth of data comparing TECAB to open approaches compels the need for future comparative trials.

Effect of new-onset atrial fibrillation on cause-specific late mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common complication after coronary artery bypass grafting. Although transient, POAF is linked to increased late mortality. We hypothesized that POAF increases late cerebrovascular (CeV) and composite cerebrovascular/cardiovascular/vascular (CV* = CeV + CV + Other-V) but not non-cardiovascular (Non-CV) mortality. METHODS: We analysed 8807 non-salvage coronary artery bypass grafting patients (1994-2011). Fifteen-year and time-segmented (early, 0-1 year; intermediate, 1-6 years and late, 6-15 years) all-cause and cause-specific mortality were compared for POAF versus No-POAF patients. Corresponding POAF versus No-POAF adjusted hazard ratios [AHRs (95% confidence interval, CI)] were derived using the competing risk Cox regression. RESULTS: POAF occurred in 1992 (23%) patients. Complications other than POAF occurred in 1875 (21%) patients but were more frequent among POAF patients (31% vs 18%; P < 0.001). Overall mean follow-up was 9 ± 4 years. POAF patients had a higher 15-year unadjusted mortality (53% vs 39%; P < 0.001) and were consequently associated with higher adjusted all-cause [AHR (95% CI) = 1.23 (1.14-1.33)] and composite cardiovascular [CV*: AHR (95% CI) = 1.15 (1.02-1.30)] mortality. The trends towards a higher 15-year CeV [AHR (95% CI) = 1.34 (0.94-1.91)] and Non-CV [AHR (95% CI) = 1.12 (0.99-1.26)] mortality were not significant. Time-segmented analyses showed that (i) POAF increased all-cause mortality early, and this persisted in the intermediate and late periods and (ii) CeV [AHR (95% CI) = 2.14 (1.14-4.04)] and CV* [AHR (95% CI) = 1.31 (1.06-1.62)] mortality rates were increased in the intermediate but not in the early or late periods. Non-CV mortality was similar in POAF and No-POAF for all time intervals. These findings were corroborated in propensity-matched sub-cohorts and in sensitivity analyses in patients free of any other complication. CONCLUSIONS: POAF is associated with worse long-term survival principally driven by increased intermediate-term cerebrovascular and cardiovascular mortality, while Non-CV mortality was similar.

Optimal management of radial artery grafts in CABG: Patient and target vessel selection and anti-spasm therapy.

The current literature on radial artery grafting is reviewed focusing on the optimal deployment of radial artery grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery with specific attention to the selection of patients and target vessels for radial artery grafting.

Incidence, risk factors, and prognostic impact of re-exploration for bleeding after cardiac surgery: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative re-exploration for bleeding (RB) is a frequent complication following cardiac surgery. We aim to assess incidence, risk factors, and prognostic significance of RB in a large cohort of cardiac patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed prospectively collected data for all patients who underwent cardiac surgery at our institution from 2007 to 2015. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of RB and specific outcomes. Propensity matching using a 1:1-ratio compared outcomes of patients who had RB with patients who did not. RESULTS: During the study period, 7381 patients underwent cardiac operations. Of them, 189 (2.6%) underwent RB. RB was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (Odds Ratio (OR):2.62 Confidence Interval (CI):1.38-4.96; p = 0.003), major adverse events (OR:3.94, CI:2.79-5.62; p < 0.001), gastrointestinal events (OR:3.54 CI:1.73-7.24), renal failure (OR:2.44, CI:1.23-4.82), prolonged ventilation (OR:3.83, CI:2.60-5.62, p < 0.001), and sepsis (OR:2.50, CI:1.03-6.04, p = 0.043). Preoperative shock (OR:3.68, CI:1.66-8.13; p = 0.001), congestive heart failure (OR:1.70 CI:1.24-2.32; p = 0.001), and urgent and emergent status (OR:2.27, CI:1.65-3.12 and OR:3.57, CI:1.89-6.75; p < 0.001 for both) were predictors of RB operative mortality. Operative mortality, incidence of major adverse events, gastrointestinal events, and respiratory failure were all significantly higher in the propensity matched RB group (p = 0.050, p < 0.001, p = 0.046, and p < 0.001 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: RB significantly increases in-hospital mortality and morbidity after cardiac surgery.