RASA3 is a candidate gene in sickle cell disease-associated pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. RASA3 is a GTPase activating protein integral to angiogenesis and endothelial barrier function. In this study, we explore the association of RASA3 genetic variation with PH risk in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD)-associated PH and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Cis-expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) were queried for RASA3 using whole genome genotype arrays and gene expression profiles derived from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of three SCD cohorts. Genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) near or in the RASA3 gene that may associate with lung RASA3 expression were identified, reduced to 9 tagging SNPs for RASA3 and associated with markers of PH. Associations between the top RASA3 SNP and PAH severity were corroborated using data from the PAH Biobank and analyzed based on European or African ancestry (EA, AA). We found that PBMC RASA3 expression was lower in patients with SCD-associated PH as defined by echocardiography and right heart catheterization and was associated with higher mortality. One eQTL for RASA3 (rs9525228) was identified, with the risk allele correlating with PH risk, higher tricuspid regurgitant jet velocity and higher pulmonary vascular resistance in patients with SCD-associated PH. rs9525228 associated with markers of precapillary PH and decreased survival in individuals of EA but not AA. In conclusion, RASA3 is a novel candidate gene in SCD-associated PH and PAH, with RASA3 expression appearing to be protective. Further studies are ongoing to delineate the role of RASA3 in PH.

Mendelian randomisation and experimental medicine approaches to interleukin-6 as a drug target in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Inflammation and dysregulated immunity are important in the development of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Compelling preclinical data supports the therapeutic blockade of interleukin-6 (IL-6) signalling. METHODS: We conducted a phase 2 open-label study of intravenous tocilizumab (8 mg·kg-1) over 6 months in patients with group 1 PAH. Co-primary end-points were safety, defined by incidence and severity of adverse events, and change in pulmonary vascular resistance. Separately, a mendelian randomisation study was undertaken on 11 744 individuals with European ancestry including 2085 patients with idiopathic/heritable disease for the IL-6 receptor (IL6R) variant (rs7529229), known to associate with circulating IL-6R levels. RESULTS: We recruited 29 patients (male/female 10/19; mean±sd age 54.9±11.4 years). Of these, 19 had heritable/idiopathic PAH and 10 had connective tissue disease-associated PAH. Six were withdrawn prior to drug administration; 23 patients received at least one dose of tocilizumab. Tocilizumab was discontinued in four patients owing to serious adverse events. There were no deaths. Despite evidence of target engagement in plasma IL-6 and C-reactive protein levels, both intention-to-treat and modified intention-to-treat analyses demonstrated no change in pulmonary vascular resistance. Inflammatory markers did not predict treatment response. Mendelian randomisation did not support an effect of the lead IL6R variant on risk of PAH (OR 0.99, p=0.88). CONCLUSION: Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of tocilizumab. Tocilizumab did not show any consistent treatment effect.