Safety and Efficacy of Postoperative Indwelling Popliteal Nerve Catheters for Outpatient Charcot-Marie-Tooth Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Outpatient surgical deformity correction for Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease is limited by effective postoperative pain control. Our previous institutional protocol for foot and ankle surgery in this population included preoperative single-injection nerve blocks, but patients often experienced uncontrolled pain when the block wore off postoperative day 0 or 1, resulting in high opioid requirements and unplanned emergency department visits. The use of ultrasonography-guided continuous nerve catheters in CMT patients has not previously been studied. We aimed to prospectively investigate the safety and efficacy of ultrasonography-guided indwelling popliteal catheters in CMT patients undergoing outpatient foot deformity correction surgery. METHODS: Twenty CMT patients, average 28 (range 13-53) years old, undergoing reconstructive surgery by a single foot and ankle attending surgeon were consented for preoperative ultrasonography-guided popliteal catheters. This series included 24 total outpatient procedures; 4 were staged bilateral. Indwelling popliteal catheters were maintained on discharge, providing continuous infusion until postoperative day (POD) 3, and then self-discontinued. Patients were prescribed oxycodone 5 mg (60-80 pills) as needed for breakthrough pain. Outcomes collected included daily pain scores (0-10), an opioid pill count on POD 14, and patient satisfaction ratings. Neurologic evaluation by 5-point 10g Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing was performed preoperatively and on POD 14. RESULTS: There were no observed catheter-site infections or hematomas. Nine of the patients had pre-existing sensory deficits involving at least 2 areas on the 5-point monofilament test. Postoperative testing showed these deficits were unchanged and there were no instances of new sensory deficits. Postoperative pain scores were typically low, with median values (interquartile ranges [IQRs]) of 3.5 (2.0-5.0) on POD 1, 2.5 (2.0-5.0) on POD 2, and 2.5 (1.0-3.75) on POD 3. At POD 14, pain was 1.0 (0-1.0). Patients consumed a median of 25 oxycodone pills (IQR 8-43) over 2 weeks, less than half the prescribed number. Patient satisfaction was high. All patients reported they would choose to have a nerve catheter again for a similar surgery. CONCLUSION: This cases series demonstrated that regional anesthesia using ultrasonography-guided indwelling popliteal catheters was safe and effective for pain control in CMT patients undergoing outpatient foot and ankle surgery. Opioid consumption was comparable to published rates following major bony procedures, and no patients required emergent treatment or hospital admission for uncontrolled pain. No new sensory deficits were detected and patients with underlying sensory deficits remained unchanged. Patients were highly satisfied. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Evaluation of two portable pupillometers to assess clinical utility.

BACKGROUND: Pupillometers have been proposed as clinical assessment tools. We compared two pupillometers to assess measurement agreement. MATERIALS & METHODS: We enrolled 30 subjects and simultaneously measured the pupil diameter and light reflex amplitude with an iPhone pupillometer and a portable infrared pupillometer. We then enrolled 40 additional subjects and made serial measurements with each device. RESULTS: Failure occurred in 30% of attempts made with the iPhone pupillometer compared with 4% of attempts made with the infrared pupillometer (Fisher's exact p = 0.0001). Method comparison of the two devices used simultaneously showed significant disagreement in dynamic measurements. CONCLUSION: The iPhone pupillometer had poor repeatability and suggests that it is not a practical tool to support clinical decisions.

A patient advocacy program established through an interprofessional student-run free clinic.

This report describes a student-run free clinic model that exposes medical, nursing, and social work students to interprofessional care of the underserved early in their training. As a result of a new partnership with social work students, a patient advocacy program was established, which helped patients apply for an expanded Medicaid program.

Development of a mild traumatic brain injury-specific vision screening protocol: a Delphi study.

Although traumatic brain injury (TBI) can happen to anyone at any time, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have brought it renewed attention. Fortunately, most cases of TBI from the recent conflicts are mild TBI (mTBI). Still, many physical, psychological, and social problems are associated with mTBI. Among the difficulties encountered are oculomotor and vision problems, many of which can impede daily activities such as reading. Therefore, correct diagnosis and treatment of these mTBI-related vision problems is an important part of patient recovery. Numerous eye care providers in the Department of Veterans Affairs, in military settings, and in civilian practices specialize and are proficient in examining patients who have a history of TBI. However, many do not have this level of experience working with and treating patients with mTBI. Recognizing this, we used a modified Delphi method to derive expert opinions from a panel of 16 optometrists concerning visual examination of the patient with mTBI. This process resulted in a clinical tool containing 17 history questions and 7 examination procedures. This tool provides a set of clinical guidelines that can be used as desired by any eye care provider either as a screening tool or adjunct to a full eye examination when seeing a patient with a history of mTBI. The goal of this process was to provide optimal and uniform vision care for the patient with mTBI.