Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Psychiatry Res ; 165(1-2): 154-62, 2009 Jan 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19046604

ABSTRACT

Eating disturbances continue to grow among college students, and researchers have begun to investigate factors that may lead to abnormal eating behaviors in this population. Recent research has also suggested that excessive exercise can become a compulsive behavior that may affect psychological health. The aim of this exploratory study was to evaluate the relationships between both compulsive eating and exercise, and demographic and clinical variables in a college population. Participants were 589 undergraduates (mean age 20 years) recruited during a mental health screening at two different campuses. Participants completed a screening package of measures including a questionnaire about socio-demographic data, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS), the Consumptive Habits Questionnaire (CHQ), the Modified Overt Aggression Scale-Self-rated version (MOAS), and the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short version (QLESQ). A prevalence rate of 7.2% was found for compulsive eating and 18.1% for compulsive exercise, as measured by the CHQ. Only 11 participants (1.9%) reported both compulsive eating and exercise. There was no significant relationship between compulsive eating and compulsive exercise. The results suggest that college students may represent a group at high risk of developing abnormal eating behaviors and compulsive exercise.


Subject(s)
Compulsive Behavior/epidemiology , Eating/psychology , Exercise/psychology , Students/psychology , Students/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Aggression/psychology , Compulsive Behavior/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Feeding and Eating Disorders/epidemiology , Feeding and Eating Disorders/psychology , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Mass Screening , Personality Inventory , Quality of Life/psychology , Risk Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , United States , Young Adult
2.
Psychiatry Res ; 160(2): 184-91, 2008 Aug 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18573540

ABSTRACT

The investigation of comorbidity between major depressive disorder (MDD) and personality disorders (PDs) has attracted considerable interest. Whereas some studies found that the presence of PDs has adverse effects on the course and treatment of MDD, others have failed to demonstrate this link. These inconsistent findings suggest that specific PD comorbidity might affect the course of MDD by modulating factors that increase the overall risk of depression, including an elevated tendency to perceive stress. To investigate whether the presence of a specific PD cluster was associated with elevated levels of stress appraisal, we administered the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) before and after treatment to 227 MDD outpatients enrolled in an 8-week open-label treatment with fluoxetine. Following treatment, multiple linear regression analyses revealed that the presence of Cluster A, but not Cluster B or C, was associated with higher levels of perceived stress, even after adjusting for baseline depression severity and PSS scores, as well as various sociodemographic variables. The presence of Cluster A PD comorbidity was uniquely associated with elevated stress appraisal after antidepressant treatment, raising the possibility that stress exacerbation might be an important factor linked to poor treatment outcome in MDD subjects with Cluster A pathology.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Health Status , Personality Disorders/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Ambulatory Care , Comorbidity , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Female , Fluoxetine/therapeutic use , Humans , Life Change Events , Male , Middle Aged , Personality Disorders/diagnosis , Personality Disorders/psychology , Personality Inventory/statistics & numerical data , Psychometrics , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Severity of Illness Index , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
3.
Depress Anxiety ; 24(6): 433-9, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17086540

ABSTRACT

A key component of how depression may impact personality pathology involves an understanding of how cognition and dysfunctional attitudes may change as a result of experiencing a depressive state, and how these changes may affect reporting of personality disorder symptoms. This study examines whether dysfunctional attitudes are related to the stability of personality disorder diagnoses. The sample comprised 64 outpatients who were treatment responders following an 8-week acute treatment phase for major depressive disorder (MDD), met criteria for remission throughout a 26-week continuation phase, and completed a personality disorder assessment Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Axis II Disorders (SCID-II) at the beginning and end of each treatment phase. The Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (DAS) was given to patients at the beginning of the continuation phase. We found that following successful treatment of the MDD, individuals with stable personality disorder diagnoses (e.g., meeting criteria for a personality disorder at both the beginning and endpoint of continuation treatment) had greater severity of dysfunctional attitudes (P =.001) at the beginning of the continuation treatment compared to those who never met criteria for a personality disorder during continuation treatment. Though there was no significant relationship between DAS scores and the stability of a Cluster A or Cluster B personality disorder diagnosis, there was a significant relationship between DAS scores and the stability of a Cluster C personality disorder diagnosis (P <.001). Outpatients who had a stable Cluster C personality disorder diagnosis had higher scores on the DAS at the beginning of continuation treatment compared to outpatients who never met criteria for a Cluster C diagnosis. This finding suggests that dysfunctional attitudes that persist beyond remission of MDD may be a marker for certain personality disorders that are stable across long-term treatment.


Subject(s)
Attitude , Cognition Disorders/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Perceptual Distortion , Personality Disorders/epidemiology , Adult , Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation/therapeutic use , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Cognition Disorders/therapy , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Comorbidity , Culture , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Fluoxetine/therapeutic use , Humans , Long-Term Care , Male , Middle Aged , Personality Disorders/diagnosis , Personality Disorders/therapy
4.
Hum Psychopharmacol ; 21(4): 221-5, 2006 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16783809

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Pattern analysis has identified two types of response patterns to antidepressants: "true drug" response (TDR) and "placebo pattern" response (PPR). This study examines the relationship between cognitive factors and TDR and PPR to fluoxetine. METHODS: We assessed 310 outpatients meeting DSM-III-R criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD) who were enrolled in an 8-week open trial of fluoxetine 20 mg/day. Response patterns were determined using the clinical global impressions-improvement (CGI-I). We administered the following self-rated scales to all patients at the baseline visit and at endpoint: perceived stress scale (PSS), cognitions questionnaire (CQ), Beck hopelessness scale (BHS) and dysfunctional attitudes scale (DAS). RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-four patients had TDR, 66 patients had PPR, and 110 patients were non-responders (NR). Demographic variables and severity of depression at baseline (HAMD-17) were not significantly different between the two response pattern groups. We compared cognitive factors before and after treatment across patients with TDR and PPR, and there were no significant differences at baseline in CQ, PSS, BHS, and DAS scores. At endpoint, outpatients with PPR had significantly lower scores on the PSS (p < 0.001) compared to the patients with TDR, even after adjusting for multiple comparisons and severity of depression at endpoint. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in cognitive/psychological factors, specifically lower post-treatment perceived stress, accompany "placebo" pattern of response to antidepressant treatment and differentiate it from "true drug" response pattern, as defined by pattern analysis.


Subject(s)
Cognition/drug effects , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Fluoxetine/therapeutic use , Placebo Effect , Adult , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Stress, Psychological/psychology
5.
J Affect Disord ; 91(1): 11-7, 2006 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16427132

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Studies investigating the performance of instruments to detect major depressive disorder (MDD) have reported inconsistent results. Subsyndromal depression (SD) has also been associated to increased morbidity, and little is known about its detection in primary care setting. This study aimed to investigate the performance of the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME-MD) to detect MDD and any depression (threshold at SD) in an outpatient unit of a teaching general hospital. METHODS: Nineteen primary care physicians using the PRIME-MD evaluated 577 patients, 240 of them (75% female; mean age, 40.0 +/- 14.4), including all with MDD and a randomly subset of those without MDD, were evaluated by 11 psychiatrists using the Structured Clinical Interview Axis I Disorders, Patient Version (SCIDI/P) for DSM-IV as the standard instrument. RESULTS: The kappa between the PRIME-MD and the SCID was 0.42 for the diagnosis of any depression and 0.32 for MDD. The distribution of the number of depressive symptoms per patient suggested the existence of a continuum between SD and MDD, and a high frequency of subjects with 4-6 symptoms (close to the cutoff for the diagnosis of MDD). LIMITATIONS: The sample has a modest size and is a subset of an original one. CONCLUSION: A continuum between SD and MDD may in part explain the relatively low agreement for the diagnosis of MDD in our sample and possibly in other studies. Studies investigating the performance of screening instruments to detect MDD, should consider the relevance of identifying SD, and the influence of the distribution of the number of depressive symptoms in their results.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Personality Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care , Absenteeism , Adult , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Female , Hospitals, General , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Psychiatric Department, Hospital , Psychometrics , Referral and Consultation , Reproducibility of Results
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...