Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
3.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg ; 7(5): 850-4, 2008 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18617554

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Repair of the ascending aorta and aortic arch carries a high morbidity and mortality, which can be complicated by the often emergent nature of the intervention. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the morbidity, mortality, and long-term survival in 101 patients who underwent repair of ascending aorta and aortic arch. Depending on the urgency of the operation, the patients were categorized as elective (EL, n=82) or emergent (EM, n=19). Log-rank-list and SPS were used to evaluate the data. RESULTS: The average age was 58+/-16 years. The aortic diameter was 5.5+/-1 cm in the EL group and 6.1+/-1.4 cm for EM group. The aortic dissection in EL and EM groups was 15% and 79%, respectively. The mean circulatory arrest time (n=32 patients) was 38+/-18.5 min. The overall 30-day mortality was 4%: 0% for the EL group and 26% for the EM group. The overall 6-month mortality was 8%: 3.7% and 26% in EL and EM groups, respectively. Overall CVA was 3%: 0% in the EL group and 15.7% in the EM group. The mean CPB time was 176+/-81 min. The prolonged CPB time correlated with increased need for blood transfusion. The LOS was 12+/-8 days and correlated with increasing age (95% CI 0.06860-0.2307, P=0.0004), with NYHA stage of patients at the time of surgery (95% confidence intervals, 1.328-4.202, P=0.0003), with left ventricular ejection fraction (95% CI 0.2357 to -0.003029, P=0.0442) and with postoperative atrial fibrillation (95% CI 0.1192-0.4745, P=0.0018). The average ICU stay was 123+/-145 h. A prolonged CPB time resulted in extended ICU stay (95% CI 0.3655-1.486, P=0.0014). Further, the length of ICU stay correlated with NYHA status (95% CI 19.98-73.42, P=0.0008), age (95% confidence intervals 0.01668-3.761, P=0.0477), urgency of surgery (95% CI 65.00-124.0, P<0.0001), and length of CPB time (95% CI 0.3655-1.486, P=0.0014). CONCLUSION: Emergent operations are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Pre-existing heart failure, advanced age, and prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass are associated with prolonged monitoring in the ICU.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/surgery , Aortic Dissection/surgery , Cardiopulmonary Bypass , Vascular Surgical Procedures , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aortic Dissection/complications , Aortic Dissection/mortality , Aortic Dissection/pathology , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/complications , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/mortality , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/pathology , Cardiopulmonary Bypass/adverse effects , Cardiopulmonary Bypass/mortality , Emergency Treatment , Female , Heart Failure/complications , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Vascular Surgical Procedures/mortality
4.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg ; 7(3): 425-9, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18070813

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Aortic arch replacement is associated with high morbidity and mortality. METHODS: We evaluated the postoperative complications and risk factors in 32 consecutive patients after aortic arch replacement. RESULTS: The mean age was 61+/-15 years and male to female ratio was 24/8. Diameter of ascending aorta was 6.0+/-0.8 cm and diameter of aortic arch was 5.2+/-1.2 cm. The average New York heart association (NYHA) class was 2+/-1. The 30-day mortality was 6.2% (2 of 32 patients), one patient died intraoperatively (3%); all surviving 30 patients had f/u for at least six months, a total of 3 of 32 patients had died within six months, actuarial survival was 90% at six months. The overall incidence of neurologic adverse events was 9%; however, only one patient had a cerebrovascular accident (CVA) with a focal deficit (3%). The other two patients had global neurologic dysfunction. Other significant postoperative complications included atrial fibrillation in 15 patients (46%), ventricular fibrillation requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in one patient (3%), and pericardial effusion requiring pericardicentesis in eight patients (25%). The need for blood transfusion correlated with the cross-clamping length (Pearson r 0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.35-0.79; P-value 0.0001; R(2)=0.38). Cross-clamp time (139+/-58 min) did not have an impact on length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (Pearson r -0.09; 95% CI -0.39-0.23; P=0.58; R(2)=0.008) nor did the length of circulatory arrest (95% CI -0.44-0.21, P=0.44). The length of stay in the ICU (142+/-128 h) correlated with the NYHA stage of the patient (95% CI 0.001-0.62, P=0.04). The length of stay (LOS) (12+/-6 days) correlated with age of the patients (95% CI 0.03-0.57, P=0.03). CONCLUSION: Elderly patients and patients with high NYHA class need close postoperative monitoring in the ICU. A short circulatory arrest and aortic clamp time do not extend the LOS in ICU or in the hospital.


Subject(s)
Aorta, Thoracic/surgery , Aortic Diseases/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Heart Arrest, Induced/adverse effects , Age Factors , Aged , Aortic Diseases/mortality , Constriction , Critical Care , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Care , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
5.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 83(6): 2135-41, 2007 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17532412

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to identify predictors for survival after primary and repeat heart transplantations, and to compare their survival. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing database provided 20,787 primary heart transplants and 594 repeat heart transplants (for those patients who had previously undergone a primary heart transplant). Cox regression models were used to separately determine predictors of survival in primary and retransplant patients and to compare their survival distributions. Propensity score matching was then used to compare the survival between primary and retransplant patients adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: Similar predictors of survival were found for primary and retransplant patients. The overall increased risk of death was 71% higher for retransplant versus primary transplant patients. Propensity score analysis showed that, in patients with characteristics most similar to primary transplant patients, the increased risk of death was 133%; however, for patients with characteristics most like retransplant patients, the increased risk of death was only 34%. CONCLUSIONS: Survival after retransplantation is significantly reduced relative to survival after primary transplantation. The difference in survival between primary and repeat transplants is smallest among recipients who fit the profile of the typical repeat transplant patient. In general, these are younger patients with better functional status prior to listing, who received an organ from a younger donor.


Subject(s)
Heart Transplantation/mortality , Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic , Databases as Topic , Female , Humans , Male , Proportional Hazards Models , Reoperation/mortality , Survival Analysis , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...