Second-Trimester Dilation and Evacuation: A Simulation-Based Team Training Curriculum.

Introduction: Despite the need for providers skilled in second-trimester dilation and evacuation (D&E) procedures, there are few second-trimester abortion training opportunities for OB/GYN residents and other health care trainees. Barriers to such training include restrictive state laws and institutional policies, lack of trained faculty, and limited procedural volume. Simulation-based D&E training is, therefore, a critical tool for OB/GYN residents and other medical professionals to achieve clinical competency. Methods: This simulation for OB/GYN residents centers on a 29-year-old woman at 18 weeks gestation with intrauterine fetal demise, requiring learners to perform a second-trimester D&E and manage an unexpected postprocedural hemorrhage. We designed the simulation to be used with a high-fidelity mannequin. Personnel roles required for the simulation included an anesthesiologist, medical assistant, OR nurse, and two OB/GYN faculty. Learner performance was assessed using a pre- and postsimulation learner evaluation, a critical action checklist, and a focus group with simulation facilitators. Results: Forty-nine residents participated over an 8-year period. Learners demonstrated improved competency performing a second-trimester D&E and increased confidence managing postprocedural hemorrhage after participating in this simulation. In addition, focus group participants reported that a majority of learners demonstrated confidence and effective communication with team members while performing in a decision-making role. Discussion: In addition to improving learners' clinical competency and surgical confidence for second-trimester D&E procedures, this simulation serves as a valuable instrument for the standardized assessment of learners' performance, as well as an opportunity for all participants to practice teamwork and communication in a high-acuity setting.

Living with type 1 diabetes in Neno, Malawi: a qualitative study of self-management and experiences in care.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of type 1 diabetes (T1D) is increasing in low-income countries including Malawi. In this setting, care is frequently impacted by challenges in diagnosis and management. Access to high-quality T1D care remains limited in Malawi, with fairly low availability and high cost of insulin and other supplies and diagnostics, lack of T1D knowledge, and absence of readily accessible guidelines. In the Neno district, Partners In Health established advanced care clinics at district hospitals to provide comprehensive, free care for T1D and other noncommunicable diseases. Prior to this study, experiences in care for people living with T1D (PLWT1D) at these clinics remained unexplored. Here we examine the impact of living with T1D, knowledge and self-management of, and facilitators and barriers to T1D care in Neno District, Malawi. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study utilizing behavior change theory that consisted of twenty-three semi-structured interviews conducted in Neno, Malawi in January 2021 with PLWT1D, their families, providers, and civil society members to explore the psychosocial and economic impact of living with T1D, T1D knowledge and self-management, and facilitators and barriers to accessing care. Interviews were analyzed thematically using a deductive approach. RESULTS: We found that PLWT1D had good knowledge and practice of self-management activities for T1D. Key facilitators to care identified by informants included extensive patient education and availability and provision of free insulin and supplies. Significant barriers included distance from health facilities, food insecurity, and low literacy/numeracy. Informants described T1D as having a notable psychosocial and economic impact on PWLT1D and their families, notably worrying about having a lifelong condition, high transportation costs, and reduced working ability. While home visits and transport refunds helped facilitate access to the clinic, informants reported the refunds as inadequate given high transport costs faced by patients. CONCLUSIONS: T1D was found to have a significant impact on PLWT1D and their families. Our findings represent important areas of consideration in design and implementation of effective programs for treating PLWT1D in resource-limited settings. Facilitators to care identified by informants may be applicable and beneficial in similar settings, while persisting barriers represent areas for continued improvement in Neno.

Assessing the clinical utility of toxicology testing in the peripartum period.

BACKGROUND: Toxicology testing is frequently used as a means of gathering objective data about substance use in pregnancy, but little is known about the clinical utility of testing in the peripartum setting. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to characterize the utility of obtaining maternal-neonatal dyad toxicology testing at the time of delivery. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective chart review of all deliveries in a single healthcare system in Massachusetts between 2016 and 2020, and identified deliveries with either maternal or neonatal toxicology testing at delivery. An unexpected result was defined as a positive test for a nonprescribed substance that was not known on the basis of clinical history, self-report, or previous toxicology testing within a week of delivery, excluding results for cannabis. We evaluated the characteristics of maternal-infant dyads with unexpected positive results, unexpected positive results by rationale for testing, changes in clinical management after an unexpected positive test, and maternal outcomes in the year after delivery using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Of the 2036 maternal-infant dyads with toxicology tests performed during the study period, there were 80 (3.9%) with an unexpected positive result. Diagnosis of substance use disorder with active use in the last 2 years was the clinical rationale for testing that yielded the greatest number of unexpected positive results (10.7% of total tests ordered for this rationale). Inadequate prenatal care (5.8%), maternal use of medication for opioid use disorder (3.8%), maternal medical indications such as hypertension or placental abruption (2.3%), history of substance use disorder in remission (1.7%), or maternal cannabis use (1.6%) yielded lower rates of unexpected results compared with a recent substance use disorder (within the last 2 years). Solely on the basis of findings from unexpected test results, 42% of dyads were referred to child protective services, 30% of dyads had no documentation of maternal counseling during delivery hospitalization, and 31% did not receive breastfeeding counseling after an unexpected test; 22.8% had monitoring for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome. Postpartum, 26 (32.5%) were referred to substance use disorder treatment, 31 (38.8%) attended a postpartum mental health visit, and only 26 (32.5%) attended a postpartum visit. Fifteen individuals (18.8%) were readmitted in the year after delivery, all for substance-related medical complications. CONCLUSION: Unexpected positive toxicology results at delivery were uncommon, particularly when tests were sent for frequently used clinical rationales for testing, suggesting a need to revisit guidelines surrounding appropriateness of indications for toxicology testing. The poor maternal outcomes in this cohort highlight a missed opportunity for maternal connection to counseling and treatment in the peripartum period.

Reproductive Justice: A Case-Based, Interactive Curriculum.

Introduction: Reproductive injustices such as forced sterilization, preventable maternal morbidity and mortality, restricted access to family planning services, and policy-driven environmental violence undermine reproductive autonomy and health outcomes, with disproportionate impact on historically marginalized communities. However, curricula focused on reproductive justice (RJ) are lacking in medical education. Methods: We designed a novel, interactive, case-based RJ curriculum for postclerkship medical students. This curriculum was created using published guidelines on best practices for incorporating RJ in medical education. The session included a prerecorded video on the history of RJ, an article, and four interactive cases. Students engaged in a 2-hour small-group session, discussing key learning points of each case. We evaluated the curriculum's impact with a pre- and postsurvey and focus group. Results: Sixty-eight students participated in this RJ curriculum in October 2020 and March 2021. Forty-one percent of them completed the presurvey, and 46% completed the postsurvey. Twenty-two percent completed both surveys. Ninety percent of respondents agreed that RJ was relevant to their future practice, and 87% agreed that participating in this session would impact their clinical practice. Most respondents (81%) agreed that more RJ content is needed. Focus group participants appreciated the case-based, interactive format and the intersectionality within the cases. Discussion: This interactive curriculum is an innovative and effective way to teach medical students about RJ and its relevance to clinical practice. Walking alongside patients as they accessed reproductive health care in a case-based curriculum improved students' comfort and self-reported knowledge on several RJ topics.

The origins of the 4 × 4 framework for noncommunicable disease at the World Health Organization.

This paper traces the history of noncommunicable disease public health research and programming at the World Health Organization. Specifically, it investigates the origins of the now pervasive 4 × 4 framework focusing on four sets of diseases (cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, chronic respiratory diseases, and cancers) caused by four behavioral risk factors (tobacco use, harmful use of alcohol, unhealthy diets, and physical inactivity). We have found that the 4 × 4 framework developed as a generalization from strategies to control epidemics of cardiovascular disease and stroke in high-income countries during the second half of the twentieth century. These strategies, which were narrowly focused on interventions to address behavioral "lifestyle" risk factors as well as pharmacotherapy for physiologic risk factors, were ultimately packaged as an integrated approach initially in high-income countries and subsequently extended to low- and middle-income countries, where they have failed to address much of the burden among very poor populations.