Terapia termal con vapor de agua: variaciones técnicas entre hospitales universitarios españoles y eficacia a 2 años de seguimiento / Water vapor thermal therapy: technical variations among spanish hospitals and efficacy at 2-year follow-up

Objetivo El objetivo de este trabajo es conocer experiencia inicial con la terapia térmica con vapor de agua (TTVA) para hiperplasia benigna de próstata (HBP) en los hospitales universitarios españoles, así como describir las diferencias en cuanto a técnica y seguimiento observadas entre los centros. Materiales y métodos Este estudio multicéntrico observacional retrospectivo recogió características basales, datos quirúrgicos, posoperatorios y seguimiento a los uno, tres, seis, 12 y 24 meses, incluyendo cuestionarios validados, variaciones flujométricas, complicaciones y la necesidad de tratamiento farmacológico y quirúrgico tras el procedimiento. También se analizaron los posibles desencadenantes de retención aguda de orina (RAO) en el posoperatorio. Resultados Se incluyeron un total de 105 pacientes. No se observaron diferencias entre los grupos con y sin RAO con respecto a tiempo de sondaje (cinco y 4,3 días respectivamente, p = 0,178), ni volumen prostático (47,9 y 41,4 g, respectivamente, p = 0,147). La mejoría media a los tres, seis, 12 y 24 meses en cuanto de flujo máximo fue de 5,3, 5,2, 4,2 y 3,8 mL/s, respectivamente. En cuanto a la eyaculación, se observa una mejoría en la misma a partir de los tres meses de seguimiento que se mantiene en el tiempo. Conclusiones El tratamiento mínimamente invasivo de HBP con TTVA presenta buenos resultados funcionales a 24 meses de seguimiento, sin afectación significativa de la función sexual y con una baja incidencia de complicaciones. Existen pequeñas variaciones principalmente en cuanto al posoperatorio inmediato entre los hospitales participantes en el estudio. (AU)

Aim The aim of this work is to evaluate the initial experience with water vapor thermal therapy (WVTT) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in Spanish university hospitals, as well as to describe the differences in technique and follow-up between centers. Materials and Methods This retrospective observational multicenter study collected baseline characteristics, surgical, postoperative and follow-up data at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months, including validated questionnaires, flowmetric variations, complications, and the need for pharmacological or surgical treatment following the procedure. Possible triggers for postoperative acute urinary retention (AUR) were also analyzed. Results A total of 105 patients were included. No differences were observed between the groups with and without AUR with respect to catheterization time (5 and 4.3 days respectively, p = 0.178), or prostate volume (47.9 gr and 41.4 gr respectively, p = 0.147). The mean improvement at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months in terms of peak flow was 5.3, 5.2, 4.2 and 3.8 ml/s, respectively. As for ejaculation, an improvement was observed after 3 months of follow-up and was maintained over time. Conclusions Minimally invasive treatment for BPH with WVTT shows good functional outcomes at 24 months follow-up, without significant impairment of sexual function and a low incidence of complications. There are minor inter-hospital variations, mainly in the immediate postoperative period. (AU)

Water vapor thermal therapy: Technical variations among spanish hospitals and efficacy at 2-year follow-up.

AIM: The aim of this work is to evaluate the initial experience with water vapor thermal therapy (WVTT) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in Spanish university hospitals, as well as to describe the differences in technique and follow-up between centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective observational multicenter study collected baseline characteristics, surgical, postoperative and follow-up data at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months, including validated questionnaires, flowmetric variations, complications, and the need for pharmacological or surgical treatment following the procedure. Possible triggers for postoperative acute urinary retention (AUR) were also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients were included. No differences were observed between the groups with and without AUR with respect to catheterization time (5 and 4.3 days respectively, P=.178), or prostate volume (47.9g and 41.4g respectively, P=.147). The mean improvement at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months in terms of peak flow was 5.3, 5.2, 4.2 and 3.8ml/s, respectively. As for ejaculation, an improvement was observed after 3 months of follow-up and was maintained over time. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive treatment for BPH with WVTT shows good functional outcomes at 24 months follow-up, without significant impairment of sexual function and a low incidence of complications. There are minor inter-hospital variations, mainly in the immediate postoperative period.

Diagnóstico incidental del cáncer de vejiga en España. Estudio observacional a nivel nacional / Incidental diagnosis of bladder cancer in a national observational study in Spain

Introducción El cáncer de vejiga (CV) es una neoplasia frecuente en España. Los objetivos de este estudio fueron: identificar la proporción de pacientes diagnosticados de CV de forma incidental o tras la presentación de síntomas en un periodo contemporáneo en España; comparar las características demográficas, clínicas y patológicas entre estos grupos. Métodos El presente fue un análisis retrospectivo de un estudio observacional multicéntrico realizado en 26 hospitales del Sistema Nacional de Salud español, incluyendo a todos los nuevos diagnósticos de CV en 2011. El estudio representó 21,5% de la población española y los hospitales fueron seleccionados de forma proporcional a las regiones españolas para asegurar una muestra representativa. Los pacientes fueron categorizados según el diagnóstico de cáncer incidental o tras la presentación sintomática y se analizaron las características demográficas, patológicas y clínicas basales. Resultados En los 26 hospitales españoles incluidos en el estudio, se diagnosticaron 2.472 casos de CV, de los cuales 308 (12,5%) fueron diagnosticados de forma incidental y 2.164 (87,5%) tras la presentación de síntomas. No se observaron diferencias entre los pacientes diagnosticados incidentalmente frente a los sintomáticos en términos demográficos o de comorbilidades evaluadas. En comparación con los tumores de vejiga con diagnostico posterior a la presentación de síntomas, los diagnósticos incidentales tenían más probabilidades de ser tumores papilares, significativamente más pequeños y de tener una citología positiva/sospechosa. Además, los tumores de vejiga diagnosticados incidentalmente tenían menos probabilidades de ser músculo-invasivos (11,7 vs. 25%, p < 0,01) y de ser agresivos en el estudio patológico, con 33,6% de grado 3 vs. 50,1% (p < 0,01). Conclusiones Identificamos un porcentaje significativo (12,5%) de nuevos diagnósticos de CV realizados de forma incidental en una muestra representativa de la población española (AU)

Introduction Bladder cancer (BC) is a common malignancy in Spain. The aims of this study were: to identify the proportion of patients diagnosed with BC incidentally or after symptomatic presentation in a contemporary period in Spain; to compare demographic, clinical, and pathologic characteristics between these groups. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of a multi-centre observational study of 26 hospitals in the Spanish National Health System of all BCs newly diagnosed in 2011. The study represented 21.5% of the Spanish population and hospitals were selected in proportion to Spain's regions to ensure a representative sample. Patients were categorized by whether the cancer was diagnosed incidentally or after symptomatic presentation and baseline demographic, pathologic, and clinical characteristics were analyzed. Results 2472 were newly diagnosed with BC at the 26 participating Spanish hospitals with 308 (12.5%) of cases diagnosed incidentally and 2164 (87.5%) diagnosed after symptomatic presentation. No differences were observed between patients diagnosed incidentally vs. symptomatically in terms of demographics or measured co-morbidities. Compared to symptomatically diagnosed bladder tumours, those diagnosed incidentally were more likely to have a papillary appearance, to be significantly smaller, and less likely to have positive/suspicious cytology. Additionally, incidentally diagnosed bladder tumours were less likely to be muscle-invasive (11.7% vs. 25.0%, P < .01) nor aggressive at pathology, with 33.6% Grade 3 compared to 50.1%, (P < .01). Conclusions We identified a significant percentage (12.5%) of new bladder cancer diagnosis made incidentally in a representative sample of the Spanish population. These tumours exhibited less aggressive pathologic characteristics than their symptomatic counterparts (AU)

Incidental diagnosis of bladder cancer in a national observational study in spain.

INTRODUCTION: Bladder cancer (BC) is a common malignancy in Spain. The aims of this study were: to identify the proportion of patients diagnosed with BC incidentally or after symptomatic presentation in a contemporary period in Spain; to compare demographic, clinical, and pathologic characteristics between these groups. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of a multi-centre observational study of 26 hospitals in the Spanish National Health System of all BCs newly diagnosed in 2011. The study represented 21.5% of the Spanish population and hospitals were selected in proportion to Spain's regions to ensure a representative sample. Patients were categorized by whether the cancer was diagnosed incidentally or after symptomatic presentation and baseline demographic, pathologic, and clinical characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS: 2472 were newly diagnosed with BC at the 26 participating Spanish hospitals with 308 (12.5%) of cases diagnosed incidentally and 2164 (87.5%) diagnosed after symptomatic presentation. No differences were observed between patients diagnosed incidentally vs. symptomatically in terms of demographics or measured co-morbidities. Compared to symptomatically diagnosed bladder tumours, those diagnosed incidentally were more likely to have a papillary appearance, to be significantly smaller, and less likely to have positive/suspicious cytology. Additionally, incidentally diagnosed bladder tumours were less likely to be muscle-invasive (11.7% vs. 25.0%, p < 0.01) nor aggressive at pathology, with 33.6% Grade 3 compared to 50.1%, (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We identified a significant percentage (12.5%) of new bladder cancer diagnosis made incidentally in a representative sample of the Spanish population. These tumours exhibited less aggressive pathologic characteristics than their symptomatic counterparts.

Valor actual de los hallazgos histológicos de biopsias de próstata negativas en la predicción del riesgo futuro de cáncer de próstata clínicamente significativo / The current value of histological findings in negative prostate biopsies to predict the future risk of clinically significant prostate cancer

Introducción: Se recomienda realizar una biopsia prostática (PBx) de repetición ante una sospecha persistente de cáncer de próstata (PCa) o cuando se identifica proliferación acinar atípica (ASAP), neoplasia intraepitelial de alto grado (HGPIN) extensa (≥3 zonas de biopsia) o HGPIN con células atípicas sospechosas de adenocarcinoma (PIN-ATYP). Actualmente se recomienda realizar una resonancia magnética multiparamétrica (mpMRI) y PBx guiada por mpMRI (MRI-TBx) en una PBx de repetición. Nuestro objetivo fue analizar el valor actual para predecir el riesgo de PCa clínicamente significativo (csPCa) del hallazgo de ASAP, mHGPIN, PIN-ATYP y otros hallazgos histológicos.MétodosSe realizó un análisis retrospectivo de 377 PBx de repetición. Se realizó MRI-TBx cuando la puntuación PI-RADS fue≥3 y PBX sistemáticas de 12 cilindros guiadas por ecografía transrectal (TRUS) cuando fue≤2. ASAP, HGPIN, HGPIN multifocal (mHGPIN), PIN-ATYP y otros 8 hallazgos histológicos fueron reportados prospectivamente en las PBx negativas. El csPCa fue definido como grado ISUP≥2.ResultadosLa incidencia de ASAP, mHGPIN y PIN-ATYP fue 4,2%, 39,7% y 3,7% respectivamente, y la tasa de csPCa fue estadísticamente similar en los pacientes con estos hallazgos histológicos. Sin embargo, las tasas de csPCa con atrofia proliferativa inflamatoria (PIA) presente y ausente fueron 22,2% y 36,1%, respectivamente. La PIA fue el único hallazgo histológico que predijo un menor riesgo de csPCa, con OR de 0,54 (IC 95%: 0,308-0,945, p=0,031). La PIA fue, también, un factor predictor independiente en un modelo combinando variables clínicas y mpMRI, que obtuvo un área bajo la curva de 0,86 (95% IC: 0,83-0,90).ConclusionesLa PIA resultó ser el único hallazgo histológico predictor del riesgo de csPCa, y puede contribuir en un modelo predictivo; mHGPIN no fue predictor de riesgo de csPCa. La baja incidencia de ASAP (4,2%) y PIN-ATYP (3,7%) impidió que pudiéramos obtener conclusiones sobre estas lesiones. (AU)

Introduction: Repeat prostate biopsy (PBx) is recommended under persistent suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa) or in the face of the following findings: atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP), extense (≥3 biopsy sites) high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), or HGPIN with atypical glands, suspicious for adenocarcinoma (PIN-ATYP). Nowadays, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and mpMRI targeted PBx (MRI-TBx) are recommended in repeat PBx. Our objective was to analyze the current value of ASAP, mHGPIN, PIN-ATYP and other histological findings to predict clinically significant PCa (csPCa) risk.MethodsRetrospective analysis of 377 repeat PBxs. MRI-TBx was performed when Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score>3 and 12-core transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) systematic PBx when≤2. ASAP, HGPIN, mHGPIN, PIN-ATYP, and 8 other histological findings were prospectively reported in negative PBx. CsPCa was defined as ISUP group grade>2.ResultsIncidence of ASAP, multifocal HGPIN (mHGPIN) and PINATYP was 4.2%, 39.7% and 3.7% respectively, and csPCa rate was statistically similar among men with these histological findings. However, the rate of csPCa was 22.2% when proliferative inflammatory atrophy (PIA) was present, and 36.1% when it was not. PIA was the only histological finding which predicted lower risk of csPCa, with an OR of .54 (95% CI: .308-.945, P=.031). In addition, PIA was an independent predictor of a model combining clinical variables and mpMRI which reached area under de ROC curve of .86 (95% CI: .83-.90).ConclusionsPIA emerged as the only predictive histological finding of csPCa risk and can contribute to a predictive model. mHGPIN failed to predict csPCa risk. The low incidence of ASAP (4.2%) and PIN-ATYP (3.7%) prevented us from drawing conclusions. (AU)

The current value of histological findings in negative prostate biopsies to predict the future risk of clinically significant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Repeat prostate biopsy (PBx) is recommended under persistent suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa) or in the face of the following findings: atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP); extense (≥3 biopsy sites) high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN); or HGPIN with atypical glands; suspicious for adenocarcinoma (PIN-ATYP). Nowadays; multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and mpMRI targeted PBx (MRI-TBx) are recommended in repeat PBx. Our objective was to analyze the current value of ASAP; mHGPIN; PIN-ATYP and other histological findings to predict clinically significant PCa (csPCa) risk. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 377 repeat PBxs. MRI-TBx was performed when Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score >3 and 12-core transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) systematic PBx when ≤2. ASAP; HGPIN; mHGPIN; PIN-ATYP; and 8 other histological findings were prospectively reported in negative PBx. CsPCa was defined as ISUP group grade >2. RESULTS: Incidence of ASAP; multifocal HGPIN (mHGPIN) and PINATYP was 4.2%; 39.7% and 3.7% respectively; and csPCa rate was statistically similar among men with these histological findings. However; the rate of csPCa was 22.2% when proliferative inflammatory atrophy (PIA) was present; and 36.1% when it was not. PIA was the only histological finding which predicted lower risk of csPCa; with an OR of 0.54 (95%CI: 0.308-0.945; P = .031). In addition; PIA was an independent predictor of a model combining clinical variables and mpMRI which reached area under de ROC curve of 0.86 (95%CI: 0.83-0.90). CONCLUSION: PIA emerged as the only predictive histological finding of csPCa risk and can contribute to a predictive model. mHGPIN failed to predict csPCa risk. The low incidence of ASAP (4.2%) and PIN-ATYP (3.7%) prevented us from drawing conclusions.

Análisis del escenario microscópico de una biopsia prostática negativa como predictor del riesgo de cáncer de próstata. Una revisión sistemática / In Search for risk predictors at the microscopic scenario of a negative biopsy. A systematic review

Introducción: Las biopsias prostáticas (BP) de repetición, ante la persistencia de la sospecha de cáncer de próstata (CP), son frecuentes y su rendimiento bajo. En el contexto de una BP negativa existe un escenario microscópico (EM), que definimos como el conjunto de lesiones no neoplásicas identificable. La existencia de algunas de estas lesiones incrementa el riesgo de detección de CP en BP sucesivas, mientras que otras parecen tener un efecto protector. El objetivo de esta revisión sistemática es identificar el conjunto de lesiones que puede formar parte del EM de una BP negativa y analizar la evidencia actual de su asociación con el riesgo de detección de CP en BP sucesivas. Adquisición de la evidencia: Dos revisores independientes realizaron una búsqueda bibliográfica en Medline, Embase y Central Cochrane, con los términos de búsqueda: small acinar proliferation or ASAP or prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or HGPIN or adjacent small atypical glands or pinatyp or atrophy or proliferative inflammatory atrophy or pia or prostatic inflammation or prostatitis and prostate cancer. Se identificaron 1.015 referencias y siguiendo los principios de la declaración PRISMA y de selección PICO, se identificaron 57 artículos originales válidos para esta revisión. Síntesis de la evidencia: La proliferación acinar atípica de célula pequeña se asocia a una tasa de detección de CP en BP sucesivas que oscila entre el 32 y 48%. La neoplasia intraepitelial prostática de alto grado (HGPIN) se asocia a CP entre el 13 y 42%, siendo su multifocalidad la que define el incremento en el riesgo de detección. La atrofia prostática, la atrofia proliferativa inflamatoria y la infamación prostática parecen tener un efecto protector sobre la detección de CP en BP sucesivas. Por otra parte, el riesgo de detección de CP en varones con HGPIN multifocal se reduce significativamente si coexiste atrofia proliferativa inflamatoria. Conclusiones: El EM de una BP negativa puede estar compuesto por las lesiones de proliferación acinar atípica de célula pequeña, HGPIN, atrofia prostática, atrofia proliferativa inflamatoria e infamación prostática ya que todas parecen estar asociadas al riesgo de detección de CP en BP sucesivas. Esta revisión nos permite generar la hipótesis de que el EM de una BP negativa puede ser de utilidad en la decisión indicar BP de repetición

Introduction: In cases of persistent suspicion of prostate cancer (PC), repeat prostate biopsies (PB) are frequently performed in spite of their low yield. In the context of a negative PB, there is a microscopic scenario (MS), which we define as the group of recognizable non-neoplastic lesions. While some of these lesions seem to have a protective effect, the existence of others increases the risk of PC detection in posterior PB. The objective of this systematic review is to identify the lesions that may belong to the MS of a negative PB and analyse the current evidence of their association with the risk of detecting PC in subsequent PBs. Evidence acquisition: Two independent reviewers conducted a literature search on Medline, Embase and Central Cochrane with the following search terms: small acinar proliferation, ASAP, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, HGPIN, adjacent small atypical glands, pinatyp, atrophy, proliferative inflammatory atrophy, pia, prostatic inflammation, prostatitis and prostate cancer. 1,015 references were first identified, and 57 original articles were included in the study, following the PRISMA declaration and the PICO selection principles. Evidence synthesis: Atypical small acinar proliferation is associated with PC detection in repeat PB with rates ranging between 32 and 48%. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) is related to PC in 13 to 42% of cases. Studies show that HGPIN, when multifocal, is a significant independent risk factor for PC. Prostatic atrophy, inflammatory proliferative atrophy and prostatic inflammation seem to act as protective factors on the detection of PC in repeat PB. On the other hand, the risk of PC detection reduces significantly in male patients with multifocal HGPIN and coexistent PIA. Conclusions: The MS of a negative PB may include atypical small acinar proliferation, HGPIN, prostatic atrophy, inflammatory proliferative atrophy and prostatic inflammation lesions, since they all seem to be associated with the risk of PC detection in repeat PB. This review has led us to create the hypothesis that the MS of a negative PB might be a valuable and useful tool when considering repeat PB

In Search for risk predictors at the microscopic scenario of a negative biopsy. A systematic review. / Análisis del escenario microscópico de una biopsia prostática negativa como predictor del riesgo de cáncer de próstata. Una revisión sistemática.

INTRODUCTION: In cases of persistent suspicion of prostate cancer (PC), repeat prostate biopsies (PB) are frequently performed in spite of their low yield. In the context of a negative PB, there is a microscopic scenario (MS), which we define as the group of recognizable non-neoplastic lesions. While some of these lesions seem to have a protective effect, the existence of others increases the risk of PC detection in posterior PB. The objective of this systematic review is to identify the lesions that may belong to the MS of a negative PB and analyse the current evidence of their association with the risk of detecting PC in subsequent PBs. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Two independent reviewers conducted a literature search on Medline, Embase and Central Cochrane with the following search terms: small acinar proliferation, ASAP, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, HGPIN, adjacent small atypical glands, pinatyp, atrophy, proliferative inflammatory atrophy, pia, prostatic inflammation, prostatitis and prostate cancer. 1,015 references were first identified, and 57 original articles were included in the study, following the PRISMA declaration and the PICO selection principles. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Atypical small acinar proliferation is associated with PC detection in repeat PB with rates ranging between 32 and 48%. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) is related to PC in 13 to 42% of cases. Studies show that HGPIN, when multifocal, is a significant independent risk factor for PC. Prostatic atrophy, inflammatory proliferative atrophy and prostatic inflammation seem to act as protective factors on the detection of PC in repeat PB. On the other hand, the risk of PC detection reduces significantly in male patients with multifocal HGPIN and coexistent PIA. CONCLUSIONS: The MS of a negative PB may include atypical small acinar proliferation, HGPIN, prostatic atrophy, inflammatory proliferative atrophy and prostatic inflammation lesions, since they all seem to be associated with the risk of PC detection in repeat PB. This review has led us to create the hypothesis that the MS of a negative PB might be a valuable and useful tool when considering repeat PB.

Valor de la proteína STAT3 como factor pronóstico en el carcinoma renal de célula clara. Revisión sistemática / The role of STAT3 protein as a prognostic factor in the clear cell renal carcinoma. Systematic review

Contexto y objetivo: En los últimos años se han producido avances significativos en el conocimiento de la carcinogénesis renal. Hoy en día los tumores renales se clasifican en función de su perfil genético, y además se han desarrollado tratamientos específicos basados en la identificación de dianas terapéuticas. Sin embargo, todavía no se han identificado marcadores pronósticos. El objetivo de esta revisión es analizar la literatura que ha evaluado la expresión de la proteína STAT3 como marcador molecular en el carcinoma renal de célula clara (ccRCC). Adquisición de evidencia: En enero de 2018 se realizó una búsqueda sistemática de la literatura en Pubmed, Cochrane Library y Sciencedirect de las publicaciones realizadas desde 1990. Los términos de búsqueda fueron renal cell carcinoma and STAT3 or STAT-3 and prognostic factor. Se siguieron los principios de la declaración PRISMA y la estrategia de selección PICO, seleccionándose los artículos originales con series de pacientes diagnosticados de ccRCC localizado o metastásico, donde se analiza la actividad de STAT3 como marcador pronóstico. Se identificaron 132 publicaciones de las que finalmente se han revisado 10 por cumplir los criterios de inclusión. Síntesis de evidencia: La activación (fosforilación) de STAT3 (pSTAT3) en el residuo Ser727 es importante en el desarrollo y progresión de ccRCC. La expresión de pSTAT3 parece ser un marcador pronóstico y predictor de resistencia a algunos tratamientos en pacientes con enfermedad diseminada. Existe poca evidencia de su utilidad como un marcador pronóstico en pacientes con enfermedad localizada. Conclusiones: La expresión de pSTAT3(Ser727) en el núcleo de las células del ccRCC puede ser un marcador pronóstico y de respuesta al tratamiento en pacientes con ccRCC. La evidencia científica actual es limitada y son necesarios más estudios que demuestren su utilidad

Context and objective: There have been significant advances in the knowledge of renal carcinogenesis in the last years. Nowadays, renal tumours are classified according to their genetic profile and specific treatments based on the identification of therapeutic targets have also been developed. However, no prognostic markers have yet been identified. The aim of this review is to analyze literature that has evaluated the expression of the STAT3 protein as a molecular marker in clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC). Evidence acquisition: In January 2018 a systematic review was conducted in Pubmed, Cochrane library and Sciencedirect databases, from papers published from 1990. Search terms were "renal cell carcinoma" and "STAT3" or "STAT-3" and prognostic factor. Following the principles of the PRISMA declaration and the PICO selection strategy, original articles with series of patients diagnosed with localized or metastatic ccRCC, and where the activity of STAT3 is analyzed as a prognostic marker, were selected. A total of 132 publications were identified, of which 10 were finally revised, for they met the inclusion criteria. Evidence synthesis: STAT3 activation (phosphorylation) through Ser727 is important during ccRCC development and progression. PSTAT3 expression seems to be a prognostic marker and an antiangiogenic-resistance marker in metastatic patients. There is little evidence as prognostic marker in patients with localized disease. Conclusions: STAT3 (Ser 727) expression in the nucleus of the ccRCC cells can be a prognostic marker and an antiangiogenic-resistance marker. Current scientific evidence is limited and more studies are needed to demonstrate its usefulness

The role of STAT3 protein as a prognostic factor in the clear cell renal carcinoma. Systematic review. / Valor de la proteína STAT3 como factor pronóstico en el carcinoma renal de célula clara. Revisión sistemática.

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: There have been significant advances in the knowledge of renal carcinogenesis n the last years. Nowadays, renal tumors are classified according to their genetic profile and specific treatments based on the identification of therapeutic targets have also been developed. However, no prognostic markers have yet been identified. The aim of this review is to analyse literature that has evaluated the expression of the STAT3 protein as a molecular marker in clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: In January 2018 a systematic review was conducted in Pubmed, Cochrane library and Sciencedirect databases, from papers published from 1990. Search terms were"renal cell carcinoma"and"STAT3"or"STAT-3"and"prognostic factor. Following the principles of the PRISMA declaration and the PICO selection strategy, original articles with series of patients diagnosed with localized or metastatic ccRCC, and where the activity of STAT3 is analysed as a prognostic marker, were selected. A total of 132 publications were identified, of which 10 were finally revised, for they met the inclusion criteria. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: STAT3 activation (phosphorylation) through Ser727 is important during ccRCC development and progression. PSTAT3 expression seems to be a prognostic marker and an antiangiogenic-resistance marker in metastatic patients. There is little evidence as prognostic marker in patients with localized disease. CONCLUSIONS: STAT3 (Ser 727) expression in the nucleus of the ccRCC cells can be a prognostic marker and an antiangiogenic-resistance marker. Current scientific evidence is limited and more studies are needed to demonstrate its usefulness.

[Catheterization after ureteroscopy. Always? never? when?] / Cateterización tras Ureteroscopia, ¿siempre, nunca, cuándo?

OBJECTIVE: The development of smaller diameter ureteroscopes, along with the advance in surgical techniques has allowed ureteroscopy to be progressively less traumatic. The considerable morbidity produced by a ureteral stent makes it advisable to question routine placement. METHODS: We performed a review of the literature searching for systematic reviews, meta-analysis and prospective randomized clinical trials. RESULTS: Three systematic reviews and meta-analysis along with 14 clinical trials were included in our review. Most of the consulted articles show a higher incidence of irritative urinary symptoms, and hypogastric and flank pain in patients carrying a JJ stent. No differences were observed in postoperative complication rates. DISCUSSION: Apparently, there is little benefit in ureteral stenting regarding postoperative complications after uncomplicated ureteroscopy, with a few exceptions. The challenge regarding ureteral stenting after ureteroscopy is to identify the cases that will benefit from it. An interesting alternative, that requires further study, is the placement of a ureteral catheter (internal-external) during the first 24 hours after procedure. CONCLUSIONS: It seems advisable to place a JJ stent in complicated cases or in those considered to have a higher risk of postoperative complications. In the rest of cases it seems that stenting after ureteroscopy involves more problems tan benefits.

Tumorectomía off-clamp por retroperitoneocopia en tumores renales posteriores de complejidad media (Padua score 8-9) / Off-Clamp Renal Tumourectomy by Retroperitoneoscopy in Posterior Renal Tumours of Medium Complexity (Padua score 8-9)

Introducción: Las guías recomiendan cirugía parcial en tumores renales T1. Diferentes aspectos han evolucionado en estos últimos años: forma y duración del clampaje, enucleación, abordaje por retroperitoneoscopia y la utilización de puertos de 3 mm. Presentamos nuestra serie inicial de tumorectomía renal laparoscópica por retroperitoneoscopia (TRLR) analizando nuestra curva de aprendizaje y el uso de instrumental de 3 mm. Material y métodos: De enero 2011 a enero 2015, realizamos TRLR a 50 pacientes con tumores renales T1 de cara posterior o convexidad renal. Tras 10 casos, la técnica pasó a ser off-clamp y posteriormente en 11 casos se realizó con 3 mm. Resultados: El tamaño tumoral fue de 34,36 mm (14-62) con un PADUA de 8,42 (5-12), tiempo operatorio de 163,1 minutos (75-300) y tiempo de isquemia caliente de 4,21 minutos (0-28). No se clampó la arteria renal principal en 41 (82%) pacientes y ningún vaso (isquemia 0) en 39 (78%). Siete casos presentaron márgenes positivos (6 focales). Se realizaron 11 TRLR con material de 3 mm con un tiempo quirúrgico, sangrado intraoperatorio y estancia hospitalaria menores. Conclusiones: La retroperitoneoscopia sumada a enucleación permiten la extirpación sin clampaje de tumores posteriores del riñón con una curva de aprendizaje relativamente corta. El material de 3 mm permite realizar la técnica aunque en nuestra experiencia ha resultado en una mayor tasa de márgenes quirúrgicos positivos

Background: The guidelines recommend partial surgery for T1 renal tumours. Various aspects of this surgery have evolved in recent years, including the clamping method and duration, enucleation, the retroperitoneoscopic approach and the use of 3 mm ports. We present our initial series on laparoscopic renal tumourectomy by retroperitoneoscopy (LRTR) and analyse our learning curve and use of 3-mm instrumentation. Material and Methods: From January 2011 to January 2015, we performed LRTR on 50 patients with posterior or convex T1 renal tumours. After 10 cases, the technique changed to off-clamp, and 11 cases were subsequently performed with 3 mm instrumentation. Results: The mean tumour size was 34.36 mm (14-62), with a mean PADUA score of 8.42 (5-12). The mean operative time was 163.1 minutes (75-300), and the mean warm ischaemia time was 4.21 minutes (0-28). The main renal artery was not clamped in 41 (82%) patients, and no vessel (zero ischaemia) was clamped in 39 (78%) patients. Seven cases had positive margins (6 focal). Eleven LRTRs were performed with 3 mm instrumentation, with shorter surgical times, less intraoperative bleeding and shorter hospital stays. Conclusions: Retroperitoneoscopy coupled with enucleation enables the extirpation without clamping of posterior renal tumours, with a relatively short learning curve. The 3-mm material enables the technique to be performed, although in our experience it has resulted in a higher rate of positive surgical margins

Off-Clamp Renal Tumourectomy by Retroperitoneoscopy in Posterior Renal Tumours of Medium Complexity (Padua score 8-9).

BACKGROUND: The guidelines recommend partial surgery for T1 renal tumours. Various aspects of this surgery have evolved in recent years, including the clamping method and duration, enucleation, the retroperitoneoscopic approach and the use of 3mm ports. We present our initial series on laparoscopic renal tumourectomy by retroperitoneoscopy (LRTR) and analyse our learning curve and use of 3-mm instrumentation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From January 2011 to January 2015, we performed LRTR on 50 patients with posterior or convex T1 renal tumours. After 10 cases, the technique changed to off-clamp, and 11 cases were subsequently performed with 3mm instrumentation. RESULTS: The mean tumour size was 34.36 mm (14-62), with a mean PADUA score of 8.42 (5-12). The mean operative time was 163.1 minutes (75-300), and the mean warm ischaemia time was 4.21 minutes (0-28). The main renal artery was not clamped in 41 (82%) patients, and no vessel (zero ischaemia) was clamped in 39 (78%) patients. Seven cases had positive margins (6 focal). Eleven LRTRs were performed with 3mm instrumentation, with shorter surgical times, less intraoperative bleeding and shorter hospital stays. CONCLUSIONS: Retroperitoneoscopy coupled with enucleation enables the extirpation without clamping of posterior renal tumours, with a relatively short learning curve. The 3-mm material enables the technique to be performed, although in our experience it has resulted in a higher rate of positive surgical margins.

Recurrencia de carcinoma de células transicionales en remanente ureteral tras nefroureterectomía. A propósito de un caso / Recurrence of transitional cell carcinoma in uretheral remnant after nephroureterectomy: About a clinical case

El tratamiento de elección para el carcinoma urotelial del tramo urinario superior (CU-TUS) de alto grado, musculoinvasivo o de amplia extensión es la nefroureterectomía (NFU). La exé- resis del tramo distal del uréter ha pasado por diversas opciones siendo finalmente la desinserción ureteral y rodete vesical la que ofrece mejores resultados. En caso de no realizarse dicha desinserción, el remanente ureteral presenta un riesgo de recurrencia (o recidiva) tumoral de hasta del 45%, siendo el seguimiento oncológico más dificultoso. Se presenta el caso clínico de un paciente con antecedente de NFU por CU-TUS en el que se quedó un remanente ureteral que presentó recurrencia tumoral (AU)

The gold standard treatment for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma is nephroureterectomy (NFU) plus uretherectomy with bladder cuff. If such detachment is not made, risk of recurrence up to 45% in the uretheral remaining is feasible, being oncological follow-up more difficult. We present a case report of a patient with history of NFU by CU- TUS with tumor recurrence in the residual urether (AU)

Hemangioma papilar como causa de macrohematuria. Presentación de un caso y revisión de la literatura / Papillary hemangioma as a cause of macrohematuria. A case report and review of the literature

La hematuria recidivante unilateral supone un reto diagnóstico y terapéutico para el urólogo. El hemangioma renal (HR) figura entre las posibles causas. La localización en la papila renal es típica. Se presenta un caso de hematuria secundaria a HR que fue diagnosticado en primera instancia como síndrome del cascanueces. Tras una revaloración se realizó ureterorrenoscopia que demostró un hemangioma papilar sangrante. La lesión fue tratada con fotovaporización láser con buen resultado. Se revisa la etiopatogenia, diagnóstico y las opciones terapéuticas frente al HR sangrante (AU)

Unilateral recurrent hematuria is a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for the urologist. The renal hemangioma (RH) is a possible cause. The location is typically the renal papilla. A case of hematuria secondary to RH who was diagnosed at first instance and nutcracker syndrome is presented. After a diagnostic reassessment ureterorenoscopy was performed which showed a bleeding papillary hemangioma. The lesion was treated with laser PVP with good results. The pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapeutic options against the bloody RH is reviewed (AU)

Incidencia, diagnóstico y tratamiento del cáncer urológico en el paciente trasplantado renal. Revisión de la bibliografía / Incidence, diagnosis and treatment of urological cancer in patients with kidney transplantation. Literature review

La inmunosupresión a la cual se someten los pacientes trasplantados renales se ha relacionado a un incremento en la incidencia de las enfermedades neoplásicas, así como un comportamiento distinto de estas con respecto al presentado en la población general. Se realizó una revisión sistemática de la literatura en PubMed, de los artículos referidos a «tumores urológicos en pacientes trasplantados renales». Las neoplasias urológicas, representan un 15% de los tumores en el TR, además de ser en algunas series la principal causa de muerte de origen neoplásico. Dicha población tiene 15 veces más probabilidades de presentar cáncer de células renales (CaCR), 3 veces de cáncer de células transicionales de vejiga (CaCTV), 3 veces de cáncer testicular, y 2 de cáncer de próstata (CaP). Los tratamientos son similares a la población no trasplantada; en caso del CCR predomina la indicación de nefrectomía radical en el riñón nativo, y cirugía conservadora en el injerto. En el CaP localizado, la prostatectomía radical es técnicamente factible. En el CaCTV la inmunosupresión no representa una contraindicación para la administración de BCG o MMC. Los tumores urológicos se pueden abordar de la misma manera que la población general, por lo que debido al potencial peor pronóstico en relación a la inmunosupresión se requiere, en esta población específica, un seguimiento más estrecho (AU)

The immunosuppression to which the kidney transplant patients are subject, has been linked to an increase in the incidence of neoplastic diseases, as to a difference in behaviorof this diseases with respect to the general population. A systematic review of the literature in PubMed focused on the articles with the topic " urological tumors in renal transplant recipients" was conducted. The urological neoplasms represent 15 % of all tumors in renal transplant recipients. In some series they are the main cause of death. This population has increased incidence rate of renal cell carcinoma (15-fold), bladder (three-fold), testicular (three-fold), and prostate cancer (two-fold). The treatment they receive are similar to that of the general population; RCC has to be treated with radical native nephrectomy in case of tumor, and conservative surgery in case of tumor in the graft. In patients with localized prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy is technically feasible. Regarding transitional cell carcinoma, immunosuppression is not a contraindication for the administration of BCG or MMC. These tumors can be managed following the same criteria as in the general population. Due to the potentially poor outcome because of the immunosuppression, closer monitoring is required in this specific population (AU)

Nefrectomía parcial en tumor renal voluminoso. Presentación de un caso y revisión bibliográfica / Partial nephrectomy in a renal bulky tumor. A case report and review of the literature

Introducción: La evolución del tratamiento del carcinoma de células renales (CCR) ha ido desde la nefrectomía radical para todos los casos, a la nefrectomía parcial (NP) en masas cada vez de mayor tamaño. La laparoscopia permite avanzar hacia esquemas de tratamiento conservador con masas renales cada vez más voluminosas. Debido a la renovada tendencia de tratamiento de CCR >7 cm mediante NP, se considera oportuno realizar una revisión bibliográfica y presentar un caso clínico ilustrativo (AU)

The progressive evolution in the treatment of the renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has moved from radical nephrectomy in almost all cases, to partial nephrectomy (NP) in renal masses of ever bigger size. Laparoscopy allows progress towards conservative treatment schemes with increasingly bulky renal masses. Due to the recent publishing of treatment by NP of RCC >7cm, there is appropriate to present a bibliography review and to present an illustrative clinical case (AU)

Autotrasplante renal en aneurisma complejo de arteria renal derecha / Renal autotransplantation in complex right renal artery aneurysm

Se presenta un caso clínico de aneurisma de la arteria renal derecha resuelto con cirugía extracorpórea de banco y autotrasplante a fosa ilíaca. Los aneurismas de la arteria renal pueden ser: saculares, fusiformes y disecantes, pudiendo interesar las arterias segmentarias. La HTA, dolor lumbar y la hematuria son manifestaciones clínicas clásicas. La angio TC es la técnica diagnóstica de elección. El tratamiento quirúrgico está indicado en lesiones mayores de 3 cm, evaluando en cada caso particular el riesgo-beneficio de la intervención. La angioplastia es la técnica quirúrgica de elección cuando no existe posibilidad de tratamiento endovascular. Cuando la lesión arterial es compleja una opción es realizar el autotrasplante renal (AU)

A case of aneurysm of the right renal artery treated with reovascular surgery (autotransplantation) is presented. The renal artery aneurysm can be: saccular, fusiform and dissecting, and may be interested in the segmental arteries. Hypertension, lumbar pain and hematuria are classic clinical manifestations. The angio CT is the diagnostic procedure of choice. Surgical treatment is indicated for lesions larger than 3 cm, evaluating the risk-benefit of the intervention. Angioplasty is the surgical technique of choice when endovascular treatment is no feasible. When arterial injury is complex option is to perform a renal autotransplantation (AU)

Absceso prostático. Caso clínico y revisión de literatura / Prostatic abscess. Case report and literature review

El absceso prostático es una entidad actualmente infrecuente, sin embargo, continúa siendo una patología grave, con un alto número de complicaciones y puede poner en peligro la vida del enfermo. Es difícil su diagnóstico por la gran variedad de síntomas que puede producir aunque debemos sospecharlo en aquellos casos de infección urinaria o prostatitis clínicas en las que la evolución es tórpida y la respuesta a los antibióticos escasa. La clínica y el tacto rectal orientan hacia el diagnóstico. El uso de ecografía transrectal es valioso en el diagnóstico, tratamiento y seguimiento del absceso. El tratamiento incluye antibioticoterapia endovenosa así como medidas mínimamente invasivas como el drenaje ecodirigido mediante punción-aspiración bajo cobertura antibiótica que sería la primera opción terapéutica, quedando los drenajes endoscópicos y/o abiertos para aquellos pacientes en los que esta técnica no sea efectiva (AU)

Prostatic abscess is a rare entity currently, however, remains a serious disease with a high number of complications and can endanger the patient's life. Diagnosis is difficult by the wide variety of symptoms that can occur even though we suspected in cases of urinary tract infection or prostatitis clinics where evolution is torpid and poor response to antibiotics. Clinical and DRE oriented towards the diagnosis. The use of transrectal ultrasound is valuable in the diagnosis , treatment and monitoring of the abscess. Treatment includes intravenous antibiotic therapy and minimally invasive measures such as Ultrasound-guided drainage by needle aspiration under antibiotic coverage would be the first therapeutic option, so endoscopic and / or open for those patients in whom this technique is not effective drainage (AU)