ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The authors evaluated the time course of the treatment effect of Osmotic-Release Oral System methylphenidate (OROS(®) MPH) HCl (Concerta(®), Raritan, NJ) CII in children with ADHD. METHOD: Data were combined from two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over, analog classroom studies in children (9-12 years) with ADHD. Participants received an individualized dose of placebo or OROS(®) MPH on two laboratory school days. Permanent Product Math Test and Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham scores were evaluated 0.5 hr before dosing and 1, 2, 4, 10, 11, and 12.5 hr post dose. Analysis used a repeated-measures mixed model. RESULTS: Treatment effects were present at all postdose assessment points (p < .0001 for all comparisons, n = 139). Adverse events were similar to previous reports for OROS(®) MPH. CONCLUSION: A robust treatment effect occurred with OROS(®) MPH; onset was at 1 hr and persisted for at least 12.5 hr after dosing.
Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/drug therapy , Central Nervous System Stimulants/administration & dosage , Methylphenidate/administration & dosage , Administration, Oral , Attention , Central Nervous System Stimulants/therapeutic use , Child , Cross-Over Studies , Delayed-Action Preparations , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Male , Methylphenidate/therapeutic use , Schools , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate topiramate (TPM) and phenytoin (PHT) monotherapy following rapid oral initiation in new-onset epilepsy. METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, 28-day trial of TPM (100 mg/day beginning on day 1) versus PHT (1,000 mg on day 1 followed by 300 mg/day maintenance dosing) in 261 patients with new-onset epilepsy. The primary end point was time to seizure, and the primary objective was to establish noninferiority of TPM to PHT in the risk of seizure. RESULTS: At day 28, the estimated seizure-free rate was 81.1% for TPM treatment in comparison with 90.3% for PHT treatment. Noninferiority of TPM to PHT (primary objective) could not be established [hazard ratio (HR) 2.0, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.98 to 4.12, p = 0.366), and PHT could not be shown to be superior to TPM. A higher percentage discontinued with PHT compared to TPM for all reasons (21.1 vs. 12.8%) and due to adverse events (13.4 vs. 6.8%). The most common treatment-related adverse events in both groups were dizziness, paresthesia, and somnolence. A post hoc analysis showed that TPM was superior to PHT in time to discontinuation (retention rate) for all causes (89.4% vs. 80.3%, p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: This study was inconclusive in establishing noninferiority of TPM 100 mg/day compared to a standard regimen of oral PHT in seizure risk in this population of patients with new-onset epilepsy. Given the superiority of TPM in overall retention and favorable tolerability without titration, it may nonetheless be an appropriate option in some patients with new-onset epilepsy requiring rapid treatment initiation.
Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Fructose/analogs & derivatives , Phenytoin/therapeutic use , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anticonvulsants/administration & dosage , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Child , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Epilepsy/prevention & control , Female , Fructose/administration & dosage , Fructose/adverse effects , Fructose/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Phenytoin/administration & dosage , Phenytoin/adverse effects , Recurrence , Risk Factors , Topiramate , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of topiramate versus placebo as adjunctive therapy for the outpatient management of bipolar I disorder. METHOD: In this 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adults with bipolar I disorder (DSM-IV criteria) experiencing a manic or mixed episode with a Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score of >or= 18 while taking therapeutic levels of valproate or lithium received adjunctive topiramate or placebo. Topiramate was titrated from 25 to 400 mg/day over 8 weeks and was continued for 4 additional weeks. The study was conducted from October 2001 through October 2003. The primary outcome measure was the change in YMRS score from baseline to last study visit during the double-blind phase. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD change in YMRS score from baseline was -10.1 +/- 8.7 (-40.1%) in the topiramate group (N = 143) and -9.6 +/- 8.2 (-40.2%) in the placebo group (N = 144, p = .797). Greater than 50% reduction in YMRS was achieved by 39% of the topiramate group and 38% of the placebo group (p = .914). No significant treatment differences were observed for secondary efficacy measures. Compared with adjunctive placebo, adjunctive topiramate did not worsen mania or induce depression. Paresthesia, diarrhea, and anorexia were more common in the topiramate group. The topiramate group achieved greater reductions than the placebo group in body weight (-2.5 vs. 0.2 kg, p < .001) and body mass index (-0.84 vs. 0.07 kg/m(2), p < .001). CONCLUSION: In patients treated with lithium or valproate, there was no difference in the reduction of YMRS score in the topiramate and placebo groups. Both groups showed declines of 40%. Topiramate reduced body weight significantly relative to placebo without worsening depressive or manic symptoms.
Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Fructose/analogs & derivatives , Lithium Compounds/administration & dosage , Valproic Acid/administration & dosage , Adult , Antimanic Agents/administration & dosage , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Fructose/administration & dosage , Humans , Male , Neuroprotective Agents/administration & dosage , Topiramate , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Adverse effects are the most common cause for failure of an antiepileptic drug (AED), especially when an AED is added to existing therapy. With the increased drug load, it may not be possible to titrate the newly added AED to effective doses. Reducing the dosage of AED cotherapy as the new drug is introduced may improve tolerability. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate reduction of AED cotherapy as a strategy to improve tolerability and patient retention when a new AED is added to existing therapy. METHODS: In a 20-week, randomized, open-label study, topiramate was initiated as add-on therapy in adults and adolescents (> or =12 y of age) with inadequately controlled partial-onset seizures. Patients were randomized to receive treatment in which adverse events could be managed by adjustments in AED cotherapy (flex-dose group) or treatment in which AED cotherapy dosages remained fixed (fixed-dose group). Topiramate could be adjusted as needed in both groups. In the flex-dose group, patients exited randomized treatment when topiramate was discontinued. In the fixed-dose group, patients exited when AED cotherapy was reduced due to adverse events or when topiramate was discontinued. The primary study outcome was the percentage of patients exiting randomized treatment due to adverse events. RESULTS: The flex-dose group comprised 297 patients; 302 patients were in the fixed-dose group. Significantly fewer patients in the flex-dose group exited the study due to adverse events (16% vs 23% in the fixed-dose group; p = 0.02). In the flex-dose group, 10% (17 of 168) of patients discontinued topiramate due to adverse events after AED cotherapy was reduced versus 22% (29 of 129) when AED cotherapy was not reduced. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction of AED cotherapy is a useful strategy to improve tolerability and retention when topiramate is initiated as adjunctive therapy.
