ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Rehabilitation psychologists are integral members of spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation teams. OBJECTIVE: To describe specific information regarding types and intensity of treatments delivered by rehabilitation psychologists to patients with various levels of SCI. METHODS: Utilizing a taxonomy of psychological interventions as a framework, rehabilitation psychologists documented time spent on specific psychology interventions for each interaction they had with 600 patients with traumatic SCI at 6 inpatient SCI rehabilitation centers. Associations of patient and injury characteristics with time spent on various psychological interventions were examined using ordinary least squares stepwise regression models. RESULTS: Psychologists focus the majority of the time they spend with patients with SCI on psychotherapeutic interventions of processing emotions, emotional adjustment, and family coping, while educational efforts focus mostly on coping and adjusting to the new injury. There was wide variation in the amount of time spent on psychotherapeutic and psychoeducational interventions; patient, injury, and clinician characteristics explained little of the variation in time spent. CONCLUSIONS: Variations observed in psychological treatment delivery mirror real-world human complexity and clinical experience; they are not explained well by patient and injury characteristics and set the stage for future analyses to associate treatments with outcomes.
Subject(s)
Length of Stay , Mood Disorders/rehabilitation , Psychotherapy/methods , Spinal Cord Injuries/psychology , Spinal Cord Injuries/rehabilitation , Treatment Outcome , Adaptation, Psychological , Adult , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Humans , Inpatients/psychology , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Mood Disorders/etiology , Mood Disorders/psychology , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Rehabilitation Centers , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Cord Injuries/complications , Young AdultABSTRACT
CONTEXT: The integration of psychologists as members of the rehabilitation team has occurred in conjunction with the evolution and adoption of interdisciplinary teams as the standard of care in spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation. Although the value of psychological services during rehabilitation is endorsed widely, specific interventions and their association with patient outcomes have not been examined adequately. OBJECTIVE: To address this shortcoming, psychologists from 6 SCI centers collaborated to develop a psychology intervention taxonomy and documentation framework. METHODS: Utilizing an interactive process, the lead psychologists from 6 centers compiled an inclusive list of patient characteristics assessed and interventions delivered in routine psychological practice at the participating rehabilitation facilities. These were systematically grouped, defined, and compared. RESULTS: The resulting taxonomy became the basis of a documentation framework utilized by psychologists for the study. The psychology taxonomy includes 4 major clinical categories (assessment, psychotherapeutic interventions, psychoeducational interventions, and consultation) with 5 to 10 specific activities in each category. CONCLUSIONS: Examination of psychological interventions and their potential association with positive outcomes for persons who sustain SCI requires the development of a taxonomy. Results of these efforts illustrate similarities and differences in psychological practice among SCI centers and offer the opportunity to blend research and clinical practice in an innovative approach to evidence-based practice improvement. The established taxonomy provides a basic framework for future studies on the effect of psychological interventions.
