ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Acanthamoeba keratitis is often misdiagnosed at disease onset. This study presents data to confirm the diagnosis using calcofluor white (CFW) staining. METHODS: Forty three patients were retrospectively included who presented to the Department of Ophthalmology at the University Hospital Ulm with keratitis between 2000 and 2022. Condition positive cases were diagnosed based on the typical clinical presentation of Acanthamoeba keratitis with a positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Condition negative were patients with ulcers due to other causing pathogens with a negative Acanthamoeba PCR result. The condition was compared with the CFW test results. RESULTS: After symptom onset, time until presentation was 17 ± 12 days and until diagnosis 27 ± 13 days in the 15 condition positive patients. Among the 35 patients with additional CFW test, 7 patients were condition positive and 28 negative. 5 of the 7 patients were true positive, 2 were false negative. In the 28 condition negative patients, 1 was false positive. Sensitivity of CFW was 71% and specificity 96%. The positive PCR results were available 3.4 ± 2.3 days after corneal scraping, the positive CFW test results on the same day in each case. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that diagnosis of Acanthamoeba keratitis remains difficult and therapy is initiated late. A positive CFW test confirms the diagnosis as there are almost no false positive results and it was available faster than PCR. In case of a negative CFW test, Acanthamoeba keratitis cannot be ruled out because of a high false negative rate.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The following is a comparative analysis on the treatment outcomes of corneal perforations using amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) or penetrating keratoplasty (PK). METHODS: This monocentric retrospective study was performed at the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany. A total of 78 eyes of 78 patients were included. Thirty-nine eyes received an AMT, and 39 patients were treated with a PK. Primary outcome was recurrence of perforation. Secondary outcomes were patient mortality and visual acuity. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was observed with regard to a recurrence of perforation between the two groups (26% in AMT vs 23% in PK, p > 0.99). The time of recurrences was within the first two years and did not differ statistically (p = 0.97). In addition, a proportional hazards model with cox regression regarding recurrent perforation showed no significant differences (p = 0.5). After AMT, 41% and after KP, 28% of the patients died during follow-up (p = 0.2), respectively. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (p < 0.0001) and the age at the time of surgery (p = 0.0002) were statistically significantly higher in those who were deceased. A mean follow-up of 485 ± 517 days was recorded. CONCLUSION: Both surgical methods show good results and no statistically significant difference regarding recurrent perforation rate. About a third of the patients died during the follow-up period. The decision regarding the appropriate method should therefore be based on a combination of all factors.
