Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Crit Rev Toxicol ; 41(4): 263-91, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21438738

ABSTRACT

Despite the fact that more than 5000 safety-related studies have been published on bisphenol A (BPA), there seems to be no resolution of the apparently deadlocked controversy as to whether exposure of the general population to BPA causes adverse effects due to its estrogenicity. Therefore, the Advisory Committee of the German Society of Toxicology reviewed the background and cutting-edge topics of this BPA controversy. The current tolerable daily intake value (TDI) of 0.05 mg/kg body weight [bw]/day, derived by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), is mainly based on body weight changes in two- and three-generation studies in mice and rats. Recently, these studies and the derivation of the TDI have been criticized. After having carefully considered all arguments, the Committee had to conclude that the criticism was scientifically not justified; moreover, recently published additional data further support the reliability of the two- and three-generation studies demonstrating a lack of estrogen-dependent effects at and below doses on which the current TDI is based. A frequently discussed topic is whether doses below 5 mg/kg bw/day may cause adverse health effects in laboratory animals. Meanwhile, it has become clear that positive results from some explorative studies have not been confirmed in subsequent studies with higher numbers of animals or a priori defined hypotheses. Particularly relevant are some recent studies with negative outcomes that addressed effects of BPA on the brain, behavior, and the prostate in rodents for extrapolation to the human situation. The Committee came to the conclusion that rodent data can well be used as a basis for human risk evaluation. Currently published conjectures that rats are insensitive to estrogens compared to humans can be refuted. Data from toxicokinetics studies show that the half-life of BPA in adult human subjects is less than 2 hours and BPA is completely recovered in urine as BPA-conjugates. Tissue deconjugation of BPA-glucuronide and -sulfate may occur. Because of the extremely low quantities, it is only of minor relevance for BPA toxicity. Biomonitoring studies have been used to estimate human BPA exposure and show that the daily intake of BPA is far below the TDI for the general population. Further topics addressed in this article include reasons why some studies on BPA are not reproducible; the relevance of oral versus non-oral exposure routes; the degree to which newborns are at higher systemic BPA exposure; increased BPA exposure by infusions in intensive care units; mechanisms of action other than estrogen receptor activation; and the current regulatory status in Europe, as well as in the USA, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, and Australia. Overall, the Committee concluded that the current TDI for BPA is adequately justified and that the available evidence indicates that BPA exposure represents no noteworthy risk to the health of the human population, including newborns and babies.


Subject(s)
Estrogens, Non-Steroidal/toxicity , Hazardous Substances/toxicity , Phenols/toxicity , Animals , Benzhydryl Compounds , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Environmental Monitoring , Half-Life , Humans , Mice , Rats , Risk Assessment , Toxicity Tests/methods
3.
Arch Toxicol ; 82(4): 211-36, 2008 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18322675

ABSTRACT

During the last two decades, substantial efforts have been made towards the development and international acceptance of alternative methods to safety studies using laboratory animals. In the EU, challenging timelines for phasing out of many standard tests using laboratory animals were established in the seventh Amending Directive 2003/15/EC to Cosmetics Directive 76/768/EEC. In continuation of this policy, the new European Chemicals Legislation (REACH) favours alternative methods to conventional in vivo testing, if validated and appropriate. Even alternative methods in the status of prevalidation or validation, but without scientific or regulatory acceptance may be used under certain conditions. Considerable progress in the establishment of alternative methods has been made in some fields, in particular with respect to methods predicting local toxic effects and genotoxicity. In more complex important fields of safety and risk assessment such as systemic single and repeated dose toxicity, toxicokinetics, sensitisation, reproductive toxicity and carcinogenicity, it is expected that the development and validation of in silico methods, testing batteries (in vitro and in silico) and tiered testing systems will have to overcome many scientific and regulatory obstacles which makes it extremely difficult to predict the outcome and the time needed. The main reasons are the complexity and limited knowledge of the biological processes involved on one hand and the long time frame until validation and regulatory acceptance of an alternative method on the other. New approaches in safety testing and evaluation using "Integrated Testing Strategies" (ITS) (including combinations of existing data, the use of chemical categories/grouping, in vitro tests and QSAR) that have not been validated or not gained wide acceptance in the scientific community and by regulatory authorities will need a thorough justification of their appropriateness for a given purpose. This requires the availability of knowledge and experience of experts in toxicology. The challenging deadlines for phasing out of in vivo tests in the Cosmetics Amending Directive 2003/15/EC appear unrealistic. Likewise, we expect that the application of validated alternative methods will only have a small or moderate impact on the reduction of in vivo tests under the regimen of REACH, provided that at least the same level of protection of human health as in the past is envisaged. As a consequence, under safety aspects, it appears wise to consider established in vivo tests to be indispensable as basic tools for hazard and risk assessment with respect to systemic single and repeated dose toxicity, sensitisation, carcinogenicity and reproductive toxicity, especially regarding quantitative aspects of risk assessment such as NOAELs, LOAELs and health-related limit values derived from them. Based on the overall evaluation in this review, the authors are of the opinion that in the short- and mid-term, the strategy of the development of alternative methods should be more directed towards the refinement or reduction of in vivo tests. The lessons learnt during these efforts will provide a substantial contribution towards the replacement initiatives in the long-term.


Subject(s)
Animal Testing Alternatives/legislation & jurisprudence , Animals, Laboratory , Safety , Toxicity Tests , Animal Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Animals , Europe , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Risk Assessment , Safety/legislation & jurisprudence , Toxicity Tests/methods
5.
Environ Toxicol Chem ; 20(6): 1216-27, 2001 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11392131

ABSTRACT

A fish full life-cycle (FFLC) study was conducted for 17 alpha-ethinylestradiol (EE2) using the fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas. Newly fertilized embryos (< 24 h old) were exposed to five concentrations of EE2 (0.2, 1.0, 4.0, 16, and 64 ng/L nominal) in continuous flow-through conditions for 305 d at 25 +/- 1 degrees C. Exposure concentrations were verified by 14C-EE2 radiochemistry, supported by radioimmunoassay, and mean measured values were > or = 70% of nominal. For the F0 adult phase until 301 d posthatch, the no-observed-effect concentrations (NOECs) for growth, survival, and reproduction (as egg production) were all > or = 1.0 ng/L. The NOEC values for F1 embryo hatching success and larval survival (at 28 d posthatch) were both > or = 1.0 ng/L. While statistically detectable changes in F1 growth were evident at 0.2 ng/L, these were not considered to be biologically significant when compared with historical control data. Male fish exposed to EE2 at 4.0 ng/L failed to develop normal secondary sexual characteristics; on the other hand, assumed females exposed to this level of EE2 were able to breed when paired with males that had not been exposed to EE2. Histology of F0 control, 0.2-, and 1-ng/L exposed fish at 56 d posthatch indicated an approximate female-to-male (F:M) sex ratio of 50:50 (with no ovatestes observed in the control), while fish exposed to EE2 at 4.0 ng/L for 56 d posthatch had a F:M sex ratio of 84:5 (with ovatestes in 11% of fish). After 172 d posthatch, no testicular tissue was observed in any fish exposed to EE2 at 4.0 ng/L. At the same time point, plasma vitellogenin levels were significantly higher in fish exposed to EE2 at 16 ng/L. A lack of sexual differentiation occurred in males at concentrations > or = 4.0 ng/L. Taking into account these data, the overall no-observed-adverse-effect concentration was considered to be 1.0 ng/L.


Subject(s)
Cyprinidae/physiology , Estradiol Congeners/pharmacology , Ethinyl Estradiol/pharmacology , Life Cycle Stages/drug effects , Animals , Biomarkers , Cyprinidae/growth & development , Diet , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Embryo, Nonmammalian/drug effects , Female , Fertility/drug effects , Larva , Male , No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level , Ovary/anatomy & histology , Ovary/drug effects , Radioimmunoassay , Sex Ratio , Survival Analysis , Testis/anatomy & histology , Testis/drug effects , Vitellogenins/metabolism
6.
Reprod Toxicol ; 15(2): 117-22, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11297870

ABSTRACT

The octyltin stabilizer ZK 30.434 is a mixture of 80% dioctyltin diisooctylthioglycolate (DOTTG) and 20% of monooctyltin triisooctylthioglycolate (MOTTG) and is used as stabilizer for rigid polyvinylchloride (PVC) materials. One of the applications of such stabilized films is the packaging of foodstuffs. Exposure to humans occurs via migration of DOTTG/MOTTG from PVC materials. In the present study the developmental toxicity of DOTTG/MOTTG in NMRI mice was investigated. Dams were treated orally with doses of 20, 30, 45, 67, or 100 mg/kg/day DOTTG/MOTTG from gestation day 6 through 17 (plug = day 1). Resorption rates were significantly increased and fetal weights significantly reduced in the study group at the 2 highest doses. External anomalies, such as bent forelimbs, cleft palate, and exencephaly were reported in the group treated with 100 mg/kg/day DOTTG/MOTTG, with the 67-mg/kd dose also exhibiting a significant increase in cleft palate. Moreover, an increase in skeletal anomalies was reported in fetuses exposed to 100 mg/kg/day. The doses of 20, 30, and 45 mg/kg/day elicited a significant increase in supernumerary lumbar ribs. It can be concluded that DOTTG/MOTTG is embryo-fetotoxic and induces developmental effects. The study revealed the need for the establishment of different No-Observed Adverse Effect Levels (NOAEL) for the endpoints investigated.


Subject(s)
Abnormalities, Drug-Induced , Organometallic Compounds/toxicity , Teratogens/toxicity , Thioglycolates/toxicity , Animals , Body Weight/drug effects , Bone and Bones/abnormalities , Bone and Bones/drug effects , Cleft Palate/chemically induced , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Fetal Resorption/chemically induced , Fetal Weight/drug effects , Forelimb/abnormalities , Forelimb/drug effects , Liver/drug effects , Liver/pathology , Male , Mice , Neural Tube Defects/chemically induced , No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level , Organ Size/drug effects , Organometallic Compounds/administration & dosage , Pregnancy , Thioglycolates/administration & dosage , Thymus Gland/drug effects , Thymus Gland/pathology
7.
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf ; 42(3): 274-81, 1999 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10090816

ABSTRACT

Iodinated X-ray contrast media are diagnostic pharmaceuticals that are applied to enhance the contrast between organs or vessels examined and surrounding tissues during radiography. These substances are applied in doses up to ca. 200 g per person (corresponding to approx 100 g iodine) and are rapidly excreted. In the sewage system they contribute to the burden of adsorbable organic halogens (AOX). To assess the potential environmental impact of this release, studies on environmental fate and effects were conducted for a risk assessment of the frequently used X-ray contrast medium iopromide (brand name: Ultravist). A screening test for biological degradation (OECD Screening Test 301 E) led to iopromide being classified as not readily biodegradable. Therefore, the predicted environmental concentration (PEC) in surface water was calculated in a first step. The resulting concentration of 2 microgram/liter was then compared in a second step with the predicted no-effect concentration as derived from a battery of ecotoxicity tests. In short-term toxicity tests with bacteria (Vibrio fisheri, Pseudomonas putida), algae (Scenedesmus subspicatus), crustaceans (Daphnia magna), and fish (Danio rerio, Leuciscus idus) no toxic effects were detected at the highest tested concentration of 10 g/liter. In a chronic toxicity test with D. magna no effect was observed at the highest tested concentration of 1 g/liter. Using an assessment factor of 100 the ratio between the predicted environmental concentration (PEC) and the predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC) was calculated to be

Subject(s)
Contrast Media/toxicity , Iohexol/analogs & derivatives , Water Pollutants, Chemical/toxicity , Animals , Biodegradation, Environmental , Chemical Phenomena , Chemistry, Physical , Chlorophyta/drug effects , Chlorophyta/growth & development , Contrast Media/chemistry , Cyprinidae/growth & development , Daphnia/drug effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Iohexol/chemistry , Iohexol/toxicity , Luminescent Measurements , Pseudomonas putida/drug effects , Pseudomonas putida/growth & development , Risk Assessment , Sewage , Toxicology/methods , Vibrio/drug effects , Zebrafish/growth & development
8.
J Toxicol Environ Health ; 32(3): 307-17, 1991 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1900536

ABSTRACT

Previous studies in the rat have shown that bis(tri-n-butyltin) oxide (TBTO), used as a biocide, was immunotoxic at dose levels that did not affect other organs. In order to determine a no-effect level, weanling rats were treated for at least 28 consecutive days with TBTO at 0, 0.5, 2, 5, or 50 mg/kg of diet. Studies on clinical chemistry, hematology, pathology, and immune function, that is, plaque-forming cell (PFC) assay, delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) response, and the splenic clearance of Listeria monocytogenes, were performed at the end of treatment. No treatment-related effects were noted on clinical chemistry and hematology parameters and on PFC and DTH response, whereas thymic atrophy and impaired clearance of L. monocytogenes were noted only at a dietary concentration of 50 mg/kg. These results confirm the thymus as a target organ of TBTO immunotoxicity. Under the conditions of these experiments the dietary concentration of 5 mg/kg, equivalent to a dose of 0.5 mg/kg body weight, represents a no observed effect level (NOEL) for immunotoxicity in the Sprague-Dawley rat.


Subject(s)
Immunosuppressive Agents/toxicity , Trialkyltin Compounds/toxicity , Administration, Oral , Animals , Antibody Formation/drug effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Hemolytic Plaque Technique , Hypersensitivity, Delayed , Immunosuppressive Agents/immunology , Listeria monocytogenes/drug effects , Listeria monocytogenes/immunology , Male , Rats , Rats, Inbred Strains , Thymus Gland/drug effects , Trialkyltin Compounds/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...