ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine the influence of the COVID-19(coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic on the medical and physiotherapeutic follow-up care after reconstructions of the anterior cruciate ligament. METHODS: 116 patients (72 men and 44 women) who had received a reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament between September 2019 and December 2020 were included in this study. These patients were divided into two groups depending on the date of surgery: one group that had received surgery in 2019 before the COVID-19 pandemic and one group that had undergone surgery in 2020 and was directly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. All patients were interviewed using a standardized questionnaire regarding the influence of the coronavirus pandemic on the medical and physiotherapeutic follow-up care, as well as the moment of return to work. In addition, the range of motion of the respective knee 3 months postoperatively was analysed based on physical examination. RESULTS: At 3 months postoperatively, patients who had undergone surgery in 2020 showed a clear trend towards a higher frequency of extension deficits of ≥â¯5° (18.8% vs. 4.3%, pâ¯= 0.097) or an inability to bend the knee ≥â¯120° (23.3% vs. 10%, pâ¯= 0.197) compared to those who had received surgery in 2019. Patients who had undergone surgery in 2020 reported significantly longer delays for appointments, a higher number of futile attempts to get an appointment and a higher number of cancelled appointments, regarding both medical and physiotherapeutic follow-up care. 34.9% of the patients who received surgery in 2020 indicated that they were able to reduce the duration of their sick leave due to the increased possibilities of working in a home-office situation during the pandemic. Alternative treatment options due to the pandemic were offered by 13.3% of the physiotherapists and 12.2% of the physicians. CONCLUSION: Although the physiotherapeutic and medical follow-up care was not directly affected by a "lockdown", the pandemic led to significant restrictions, which are also reflected in a clear trend towards worse clinical outcomes. Consequently, a further expansion of alternative treatment options, which were only offered by 12-13% of practices and that are presumably of comparable relevance for various other diseases, is needed.
