Promoting sleep in low-income older adults with disabilities: Comparing CAPABLE with a social engagement control.

Sleep plays a vital role in older adults' health. The Community Aging in Place-Advancing Better Living for Elders (CAPABLE) trial, conducted in Maryland between 2012 and 2016, is a 5-month biobehavioral environmental intervention study to reduce functional disabilities in 300 low-income older adults. Individual and environmental factors impacting sleep were addressed in CAPABLE. This secondary data analysis was to test the preliminary effect of CAPABLE on actigraph-measured sleep, compared with a social engagement control in 73 CAPABLE participants with pretest-posttest actigraph data. Participants in this analysis were aged 75.8±7.5 years; 86.3% of them were females and 84.9% were Black/African Americans. Both CAPABLE intervention and social engagement control improved sleep efficiency and reduced sleep onset latency. The effect of CAPABLE on sleep was comparable to social engagement. These findings underline the importance of promoting physical function and maintaining social activity for sleep in low-income older adults with disabilities.

Standardized Lab Shoes Do Not Decrease Loading Rate Variability in Recreational Runners.

Studies of running mechanics often use a standardized lab shoe, ostensibly to reduce variance between subjects; however, this may induce unnatural running mechanics. The purpose of this study was to compare the step rate, vertical average loading rate, and ground contact time when running in standardized lab shoes versus participants' normal running shoes. Ground reaction forces were measured while the participants ran overground in both shoe conditions at a self-selected speed. The Student's t-test revealed that the vertical average loading rate magnitude was smaller in lab shoes versus normal shoes (42.09 [11.08] vs 47.35 [10.81] body weight/s, P = .013), while the step rate (170.92 [9.43] vs 168.98 [9.63] steps/min, P = .053) and ground contact time were similar (253 [25] vs 251 [20] ms, P = .5227) and the variance of all outcomes was similar in lab shoes versus normal shoes. Our results indicate that using standardized lab shoes during testing may underestimate the loads runners actually experience during their typical mileage.