Manifest and concealed AV nodal reentry in Wenckebach type of AV conduction with AV junctional escape rhythm.

An electrocardiogram was obtained that was characterized by sinus rhythm with progressive prolongation of the PR interval not followed by a blocked sinus impulse. After a critically long PR interval, the QRS complex was followed by a premature P' wave, representing an echo beat, a manifest reentry in the atrioventricular (AV) node. The pause, occasioned by the premature P' wave, was at times interrupted by an AV junctional escape beat, occurring with an escape interval of 1.21-1.24 seconds. On other occasions, however, the escape beat did not manifest on schedule, even though the pause was markedly longer than the escape cycle. This suggested that the manifest reentry was followed by a further concealed reentry, resulting in inapparent discharge of the AV junctional escape pacemaker, whose firing was postponed, thereby allowing the sinus impulse to capture the ventricles.

[Pseudo AV dissociation caused by interpolated junctional extrasystoles in the presence of a first-degree AV block]. / Pseudo-dissociazione A-V provocata da extrasistoli giunzionali interpolate in presenza di blocco A-V di primo grado.

This presentation reports an electrocardiogram showing first degree A-V block with a very prolonged P-R interval of 0.80 sec. On several occasions an arrhythmia occurred, characterized by what looked like an A-V junctional escape rhythm with A-V dissociation. This was suggested by a variable and, at first glance, haphazard relationship between QRS complexes and P waves. Analysis of the tracing suggested that the pattern was due to an interpolated A-V junctional extrasystole, followed by a sinus beat with an inordinately long P-R interval, whose duration was 1.18 sec. This very prolonged A-V conduction time made it difficult to recognize the relationship between P waves and QRS complexes, so that the pattern appeared as an A-V dissociation.

Irregular ventricular tachycardia: a possible manifestation of longitudinal dissociation within the reentry pathway.

Sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia is usually regular; that is, it is associated with constant R-R intervals. In several cases, however, the cycles of ventricular tachycardia are more or less variable. Fifty-four cases of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia were evaluated in order to assess whether tachycardia was regular. Nine cases were defined as irregular (i.e., the R-R cycles varied by more than 40 msec throughout a 1-minute recording). In five cases tachycardia was "regularly irregular," since the R-R cycles could be divided into two separate groups: the group of long cycles and that of short cycles. In these cases the variability manifested according to a defined and constant pattern: bigeminal pattern (alternation of short and long cycles), trigeminal pattern (two short cycles followed by a long cycle), and so on. The regular variability of tachycardia cycle length suggests one of the following possibilities. (1) There are two alternative circuits (a short circuit and a long circuit) that share the same exit pathway. Whenever the reciprocating impulse runs through the short circuit, the R-R cycle is short; but if a block in the short circuit occurs, the impulse runs through the long circuit, resulting in a long R-R cycle. (2) There is a longitudinal dissociation within the reentry circuit; two separate pathways with different inherent conduction velocities are present. When the impulse runs through the fast pathway, the R-R cycle is short; whereas when a block in the fast pathway occurs, the impulse traverses the slow pathway, resulting in a long R-R cycle.

Failure of parasystolic impulses to appear on schedule. Exit block due to concealed conduction of sinus impulses.

A 45-year-old patient free of any heart disease was admitted to the hospital with an electrocardiographic pattern of ventricular parasystole. The parasystolic rhythm was relatively fast, such that several consecutive ectopic complexes manifested. A later tracing reflected only isolated parasystolic complexes with long and fixed coupling intervals. The interectopic intervals, however, were once more in multiple of the parasystolic cycle as directly measured during the phases of undisturbed parasystolic rhythm. In the latter tracing, several scheduled parasystolic impulses did not yield a response, despite calculation suggesting that these impulses occurred outside the refractory period. In other words, an exit block was present. Analysis of the tracing suggests that the exit block was caused by concealed penetration of the sinus impulses into the ectopic-ventricular junction. That is, any sinus impulse penetrates into the junction and renders it refractory, in such a way that only parasystolic impulses that are relatively late within the sinus cycle may be conducted to the surrounding myocardium and result in a parasystolic complex.

Supernormal conduction in the left bundle branch unmasked by the linking phenomenon.

This presentation reflects a case of phase-3 left bundle branch block (LBBB). Analysis reveals that relatively early QRS complexes are wide, whereas beats occurring later than a critical time are narrow. There are, however, two unexpected phenomena: (1) an overlap occurs between the range of R-R intervals resulting in normal intraventricular conduction and the range of R-R intervals resulting in LBBB pattern. Complexes that follow a wide beat are often wide although they are associated with relatively long R-R intervals, whereas complexes that follow a normal beat tend to be normal even after relatively short R-R cycles. This is due to concealed retrograde penetration of the bundle branch that is blocked in anterograde direction (the so-called linking phenomenon). (2) Some early supraventricular impulses, paradoxically, resulted in normal intraventricular conduction. The phenomenon is a manifestation of supernormal LBB conduction, and only occurs following a wide QRS complex associated with retrograde activation of the LBB. The linking phenomenon reveals or unmasks the supernormal phase of LBB conduction. Following a retrograde and delayed activation of the LBB, the refractory period of the bundle branch is postponed, in such a way that a supraventricular impulse is allowed to occur during the early phase of supernormal conduction.

[Electrocardiographic diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia in patients with previous myocardial infarct: frequency and significance of diverse diagnostic criteria]. / Diagnosi elettrocardiografica di tachicardia ventricolare in pazienti con pregresso infarto miocardico: frequenza e significato dei diversi criteri diagnostici.

Electrocardiographic tracings of ventricular tachycardia were recorded from 34 patients with old myocardial infarction. The diagnostic criteria of ventricular tachycardia were carefully assessed in each tracing. The most commonly observed signs were: 1) QRS duration greater than 140 msec; 2) a prevalent negative deflection in Lead V6; 3) an interval from the beginning of the QRS complex to the S wave nadir greater than 100 msec in at least one precordial lead. The cases were subdivided into two groups on the basis of a predominant positive or negative deflection in Lead V1 (Group 1 and 2, respectively). The most common signs in Group 1 were a monophasic R wave configuration of the QRS complex in Lead V1, and a QS configuration in Lead V6. On the other hand, the most frequent criteria in Group 2 were an interval between the beginning of the QRS complex and the S wave nadir greater than 60 msec in Lead V1, and a QS configuration in Lead V6. Furthermore, none of the cases reflected a normal frontal plane QRS axis, but an axis deviation was evident in all 29 cases where axis could be calculated.

[A-V conduction in atrial fibrillation and flutter]. / La conduzione A-V nella fibrillazione e nel flutter atriale.

The assessment of A-V conduction in the presence of atrial fibrillation is based upon analysis of the R-R intervals. This is because in atrial fibrillation it is impossible both to identify the impulse that has been conducted to the ventricles, and to measure the A-V conduction time. The first step is, therefore, to evaluate whether the QRS complexes are the expression of conducted atrial impulses, or they are A-V junctional or ventricular in origin. In other words, it is necessary to distinguish between A-V conduction and A-V dissociation. Conduction in atrial fibrillation commonly results in irregular R-R cycles, whereas in the presence of dissociation the R-R cycles are mainly regular. This differentiation can be difficult in the presence of: aberrant conduction; A-V conduction disturbances; or A-V junctional tachycardia with anterograde 2nd degree exit block. The problem occurs both with tachycardia-dependent (or phase 3), and with bradycardia-dependent (or phase 4) aberrant conduction. Distinction between aberration and ectopy is helped by: the sequence long cycle-short cycle; the pause that follows the wide QRS complex; the configuration of the wide QRS complex. Since aberrant conduction may be sustained, due to the linking phenomenon, the pattern may mimick ventricular tachycardia. In atrial flutter the atrial electrical activity is far less chaotic than in atrial fibrillation, so that assessment of A-V conduction is less difficult. Nevertheless, it is impossible to determine exactly which out of the atrial impulses has been conducted, due to the extremely fast atrial rate: the conducted impulse, indeed, is not always the one that immediately precedes the QRS complex. Furthermore, it is also difficult to measure the A-V conduction time, because the F waves follow to each other without any interruption, so that it is impossible to define exactly the beginning of atrial activation. In atrial flutter, thus, as well as in atrial fibrillation, A-V conduction may be assessed by analysis of the R-R intervals, apart from measurement of F-R intervals. In the absence of drugs, atrial flutter is usually associated with 2:1 (or, less frequently, 4:1) conduction ratio, being the odd ratios (3:1, 5:1) far more rare. Due to concealed penetration of non-conducted impulses, A-V conduction intervals are often variable, so that the R-R cycles are irregular even in the presence of a constant A-V conduction ratio. The most common mechanisms leading to irregularity are the alternation of A-V conduction times, and the alternating Wenckebach phenomenon.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)