Phase II study of doxorubicin and paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy of small-cell lung cancer: a Hoosier Oncology Group Trial.

Forty-six evaluable patients with recurrent small-cell lung cancer were entered on a phase II Hoosier Oncology Group (HOG) protocol evaluating bolus doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 followed by paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 over 3 hours. Courses were repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of 6 courses. Therapy was well-tolerated with grade III neurotoxicity in 5 patients (11%), grade III/IV emesis in 5 (11%), and grade III mucositis in 2 patients. One patient had grade IV myalgias and one patient had grade III cardiotoxicity. The main toxicity was myelosuppression. Twenty-nine patients (63%) had grade IV and 8 (17%) grade III granulocytopenia. Nine patients (20%) were hospitalized for granulocytopenic fever. There was no treatment-related mortality. Nineteen of 46 patients (41%) had an objective response, including 3 complete remissions. Two of 14 patients with refractory disease (progression less than 3 months after initial therapy) responded, compared to 17 of 32 (52%) with sensitive disease (progression beyond 3 months of initial chemotherapy regimen).

A phase II study of 9-aminocamptothecin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: 9-Aminocamptothecin (9-AC) is a synthetic analogue of camptothecin. Phase I studies, identified the maximum tolerated dose as 1416 micrograms/m2/day x 3 as continuous intravenous infusion (CVI) with dose-limiting neutropenia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with measurable disease. Patients were initially treated at 1416 micrograms/m2/d x 3 by CVI followed by granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. This dose was decreased to 1100 micrograms/m2/d after the first 13 patients. Cycles were repeated every 14 days until tumor progression. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were treated, thirteen at 1416 micrograms/m2/d and 45 at 1100 micrograms/m2/d. Fifty percent had adenocarcinoma and 17% squamous cell carcinoma. Seventy-one percent had stage IV disease. Five patients had a partial response (response duration 9-28 weeks) for an overall response rate of 8.6%, (95% confidence intervals (CI): 2.9%-19%). Median time to progression was 2.3 months and the median survival for the entire study population 5.4 months with a one-year survival rate of 30%. The one-year survival rate for 27 patients who received second line chemotherapy was 56.7%. Toxicities at 1416 micrograms/m2/d included grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in six and five of 13 patients, respectively; at 1100 micrograms/m2/d these toxicities were observed in 12 and three of 45 patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: 9-AC has modest single-agent activity in previously untreated NSCLC. Its further evaluation at the dose and schedule employed in this study does not seem indicated. Exploration of more prolonged administration schedules may be warranted.

Phase II trial of uracil/tegafur (UFT) plus leucovorin in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma: a University of Chicago phase II consortium study.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Uracil and tegafur in a 4:1 molar concentration ratio (UFT; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT) has broad anti-tumor activity for cancers arising from the gastrointestinal tract. However, there are no published data regarding the efficacy of leucovorin-modulated UFT in patients with pancreatic cancer. The objective of this trial was to determine the activity and evaluate the toxicity of UFT plus oral calcium leucovorin in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with advanced measurable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were enrolled onto the trial. Patients received 300 mg/m2/d UFT plus 90 mg/d leucovorin administered orally in divided doses every eight hours for 28 days repeated every 35 days. Objective tumor response was evaluated after two courses of therapy. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. No objective responses were seen. The median (range) time to progression and survival were 14 (1.6-37), and 15 (1.9-62) weeks, respectively. Toxicity was mild with severe (grade 3 or 4) hyperbilirubinemia, pain, diarrhea, transaminitis, venous thrombus, weakness, renal failure, confusion, and edema/ascites seen in three (21%), one (7%), two (14%), one (7%), one (7%), one (7%), one (7%), one (7%), and two (14%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: In the 14 patients evaluable, UFT 300 mg/m2/d plus oral leucovorin 90 mg/d administered for 28 days did not demonstrate anti-tumor activity against advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma; however, this oral regimen was well tolerated and devoid of neutropenia, significant oral mucositis or diarrhea.

Phase II trial of uracil/tegafur (UFT) plus leucovorin in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

UNLABELLED: Although UFT 300 mg/m2/day and leucovorin 90 mg/day administered orally in divided doses administered every 8 hours for 28 days repeated every 35 days could be administered safely to patients with advanced hepatomas and good performance status, this combination and schedule has limited activity in treating advanced hepatoma. BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil has yielded higher response rates in hepatoma when compared to treatment with 5-fluorouracil as a single agent, although the impact on survival has been negligible. This study was conducted to determine the activity and evaluate the toxicity of uracil and tegafur in a 4:1 molar concentration ratio (UFT; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT) plus oral calcium leucovorin in the treatment of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (hepatoma). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients with advanced measurable hepatocellular carcinoma were enrolled onto the trial. All patients had a Karnofski performance status > or = 60%, platelet count > or = 75,000/micro L, total bilirubin < or = 2.0 x institutional upper limit of normal but otherwise normal liver and kidney function profile and bidimensionally measurable disease by CT or ultrasound examination. None of these patients received prior cytotoxic chemotherapy or radiation therapy for advanced disease. Fourteen patients received 300 mg/m2/d UFT plus 90 mg/d leucovorin administered orally in divided daily doses every 8 hours for 28 days repeated every 35 days. Two patients registered for the trial but did not receive study medication. Objective tumor response, the primary purpose of this trial, was evaluated after two courses of therapy. Other end-points included toxicity, time to progression, and overall survival. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were evaluable for response and toxicity, respectively. No complete or partial responders were observed in this trial. Three patients had stable disease lasting 17 to 22 weeks. Toxicity was mild with severe (grade 3 or 4) liver pain, diarrhea, anorexia/nausea, fatigue, dyspnea, hyperbilirubinemia, anemia, and edema seen in 3 (21%), 2 (14%), 3 (21%), 2 (14%), 1 (7%), 1 (7%), 1 (7%) and 1 (7%) patients, respectively. The most frequent grade I and 2 toxic effects included fever of unknown origin, dyspnea, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. CONCLUSION: UFT 300 mg/m2/d plus oral leucovorin 90 mg/d administered for 28 days did not demonstrate antitumor activity against advanced hepatomas. Further treatment using this regimen is not recommended for this disease.

Phase II trial of 150-minute weekly infusion of gemcitabine in advanced colorectal cancer: minimal activity in colorectal cancer.

Metastatic colorectal cancer is very common in the Western hemisphere and current treatment modalities are not effective. In this study a prolonged (150-minute) infusion of gemcitabine at a constant dose rate of 10 mg/m2/min administered weekly for 3 consecutive weeks repeated every 4 weeks revealed a response rate of 4% (90% CI < 1%-18%). There were no complete responses. Treatment with gemcitabine produced moderate to severe toxicity as grade 3-4 neutropenia requiring dose modification was seen in 40% of patients treated. When used in this dose and schedule, gemcitabine does not appear to be effective for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.