A Real-world Toxicity Atlas Shows that Adverse Events of Combination Therapies Commonly Result in Additive Interactions.

PURPOSE: Combination therapies are a promising approach for improving cancer treatment, but it is challenging to predict their resulting adverse events in a real-world setting. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We provide here a proof-of-concept study using 15 million patient records from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Complex adverse event frequencies of drugs or their combinations were visualized as heat maps onto a two-dimensional grid. Adverse event frequencies were shown as colors to assess the ratio between individual and combined drug effects. To capture these patterns, we trained a convolutional neural network (CNN) autoencoder using 7,300 single-drug heat maps. In addition, statistical synergy analyses were performed on the basis of BLISS independence or χ2 testing. RESULTS: The trained CNN model was able to decode patterns, showing that adverse events occur in global rather than isolated and unique patterns. Patterns were not likely to be attributed to disease symptoms given their relatively limited contribution to drug-associated adverse events. Pattern recognition was validated using trial data from ClinicalTrials.gov and drug combination data. We examined the adverse event interactions of 140 drug combinations known to be avoided in the clinic and found that near all of them showed additive rather than synergistic interactions, also when assessed statistically. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides a framework for analyzing adverse events and suggests that adverse drug interactions commonly result in additive effects with a high level of overlap of adverse event patterns. These real-world insights may advance the implementation of new combination therapies in clinical practice.

Review: A Roadmap to Use Nonstructured Data to Discover Multitarget Cancer Therapies.

Therapy resistance to single agents has led to the realization that combination therapies could become the cornerstone of cancer treatment. To operationalize the selection of effective and safe multitarget therapies, we propose to integrate chemical and preclinical therapeutic information with clinical efficacy and toxicity data, allowing a new perspective on the drug target landscape. To assess the feasibility of this approach, we evaluated the publicly available chemical, preclinical, and clinical therapeutic data, and we addressed some potential limitations while integrating the data. First, by mapping available structured data from the main biomedical resources, we noticed that there is only a 1.7% overlap between drugs in chemical, preclinical, or clinical databases. Especially, the limited amount of structured data in the clinical domain hinders linking drugs to clinical aspects such as efficacy and side effects. Second, to overcome the abovementioned knowledge gap between the chemical, preclinical, and clinical domain, we suggest information extraction from scientific literature and other unstructured resources through natural language processing models, where BioBERT and PubMedBERT are the current state-of-the-art approaches. Finally, we propose that knowledge graphs can be used to link structured data, scientific literature, and electronic health records, to come to meaningful interpretations. Together, we expect this richer knowledge will lower barriers toward clinical application of personalized combination therapies with high efficacy and limited adverse events.