Normal Speech Should be the Expected Outcome in the Adopted Cleft Child.

Significantly worse speech outcomes and higher complication rates are reported among internationally adopted cleft patients. We evaluated our cohort to provide more accurate counseling to adoptive parents. METHODS: We reviewed internationally adopted children with unrepaired cleft palate who had 2-flap palatoplasty with radical intravelarveloplasty from 2003 to 2015 in a single-surgeon, consecutive series. RESULTS: Seventy-two children adopted with unrepaired cleft palate were identified, 2 with syndromic association. The average age at palatoplasty was 28.1 months. Meaningful speech assessment was available in 58 patients. Successful speech was defined by a competent or borderline-competent velopharyngeal mechanism (Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Score <2). Twenty-five patients (43%) had successful speech outcomes. Twenty-nine patients (50%) were recommended secondary operation for nasality. Nonfistula repair secondary operation was performed using the following: fat grafting (9 patients, 43%), intravelarveloplasty (8 patients, 38%), and sphincter pharyngoplasty (4 patients, 19%). The average Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Score improved 5.8 to 1.3 (P = 1.3E-6); 4.8 to 1.0 (P = 0.0009) with fat grafting alone. After all interventions, normal speech was achieved in 43 (74%) of 58 patients. Palatal fistula (9.2% vs 0.9%, P = 0.001) and velopharyngeal insufficiency (50% vs 6.7%, P = 0.0004) rates were both significantly higher in the internationally adopted cohort than our nonadopted population data. The need for secondary surgery was independent of cleft type (P = 0.89), age (P = 0.78), or presence of a "wide" cleft (P = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate higher fistula and secondary surgery rates. Successful speech outcomes were achieved in most patients with minimally invasive secondary procedures.

Outcome of Palate Re-repair with Radical Repositioning of the Levator Muscle Sling as a First-Line Strategy in Postpalatoplasty Velopharyngeal Incompetence Management Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Palatal re-repair aims to improve velar function by retropositioning the levator muscles. Although it has become a popular procedure, very few studies document its efficacy. To date, this is the largest series reported to clarify its indications and efficacy. METHODS: One hundred eighty-three consecutive cleft patients presenting with velopharyngeal incompetence and evidence of abnormally oriented levator muscles underwent palate re-repair (regardless of the gap size) performed by a single surgeon from 2000 to 2015. Perceptual speech assessment was performed using the Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Score. Other patients' demographic data were collected. RESULTS: Complete records of 111 patients were available. Eighteen cases were syndromic (18.9 percent). Postoperatively, there was highly significant improvement (p < 0.001) in nasal emission (from 2.24 to 0.64), nasality (from 3.44 to 1.27), articulation (from 5.32 to 2.01), and total score (from 11.29 to 4.11). Speech became normal/borderline normal, improved or did not improve in 66.7, 24.3, and 9 percent of patients, respectively. An initial diagnosis of isolated cleft palate, Caucasians, intravelar veloplasty in the primary repair, older patients, and nonsyndromic cases were associated with better outcome. There were no reported cases of postoperative fistula or new obstructive sleep apnea. CONCLUSIONS: This large series study provides confirmatory evidence of the effectiveness and safety of the re-repair procedure. It is recommended as a first-line procedure in all velopharyngeal incompetence cases with abnormally oriented levator muscles regardless of gap size, even if the primary operation included prior muscle dissection. The pharyngoplasty rate could be significantly reduced with the current protocol. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Time course of improvement after re-repair procedure for VPI management.

OBJECTIVES: Palatal re-repair aims to improve velar function by retro-positioning the levator veli palatini muscles. The surgery includes extensive dissection, leading to tissue edema and scar formation which may need time to remodel. Together with the change of muscle orientation and tension, it is expected that a period of time is needed to reach the final functional performance. This study attempts to determine how much time is required to reach the optimum performance of the palate after re-repair. METHODS: A retrospective chart review identified consecutive cleft patients with VPI who underwent palate re-repair procedure by a single surgeon from 2000 to 2015 and achieved normal or borderline normal VP function. Only patients who had regular postoperative follow-up visits for speech assessments until resolution of speech abnormalities were included. The percent of patients cured at each time point following surgery was recorded. RESULTS: Forty-five patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age at surgery was 6.6 ± 3.2 years. Speech abnormalities had resolved in 44.5% of patients within the first 6 months after surgery, 62.2% after up to 1 year, 75.6% after up to 2 years and 88.9% after up to 3 years post re-repair palatoplasty. The remaining 11.1% continued to improve after 3 years up to 6 years. CONCLUSIONS: Re-repair procedures may take a longer time than previously thought for the final outcome to manifest. Close monitoring of improvement with continued speech therapy is recommended before deciding to move to the next surgical step in management.