Prolonged immunosuppression preserves nonsensitization status after kidney transplant failure.

BACKGROUND: When kidney transplants fail, transplant medications are discontinued to reduce immunosuppression-related risks. However, retransplant candidates are at risk for allosensitization which prolonging immunosuppression may minimize. We hypothesized that for these patients, a prolonged immunosuppression withdrawal after graft failure preserves nonsensitization status (PRA 0%) better than early immunosuppression withdrawal. METHODS: We retrospectively examined subjects transplanted at a single center between July 1, 1999 and December 1, 2009 with a non-death-related graft loss. Subjects were stratified by timing of immunosuppression withdrawal after graft loss: early (≤3 months) or prolonged (>3 months). Retransplant candidates were eligible for the main study where the primary outcome was nonsensitization at retransplant evaluation. Non-retransplant candidates were included in the safety analysis only. RESULTS: We found 102 subjects with non-death-related graft loss of which 49 were eligible for the main study. Nonsensitization rates at retransplant evaluation were 30% and 66% for the early and prolonged immunosuppression withdrawal groups, respectively (P=0.01). After adjusting for cofactors such as blood transfusion and allograft nephrectomy, prolonged immunosuppression withdrawal remained significantly associated with nonsensitization (adjusted odds ratio=5.78, 95% CI [1.37-24.44]). No adverse safety signals were seen in the prolonged immunosuppression withdrawal group compared to the early immunosuppression withdrawal group. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that prolonged immunosuppression may be a safe strategy to minimize sensitization in retransplant candidates and provide the basis for larger or prospective studies for further verification.

An update on the impact of pre-transplant transfusions and allosensitization on time to renal transplant and on allograft survival.

BACKGROUND: Blood transfusions have the potential to improve graft survival, induce sensitization, and transmit infections. Current clinical practice is to minimize transfusions in renal transplantation candidates, but it is unclear if the evidence continues to support pre-transplant transfusion avoidance. Changes in the Medicare prospective payment system may increase transfusion rates. Thus there is a need to re-evaluate the literature to improve the management options for renal transplant candidates. METHODS: A review applying a systematic approach and conducted using MEDLINE(®), Embase(®), and the Cochrane Library for English-language publications (timeframe: 01/1984-03/2011) captured 180 studies and data from publically available registries and assessed the impact of transfusions on allosensitization and graft survival, and the impact of allosensitization on graft survival and wait time. RESULTS: Blood transfusions continued to be a major cause of allosensitization, with allosensitization associated with increased rejection and graft loss, and longer wait times to transplantation. Although older studies showed a beneficial effect of transfusion on graft survival, this benefit has largely disappeared in the post-cyclosporine era due to improved graft outcomes with current practice. Recent data suggested that it may be the donor-specific antibody component of allosensitization that carried the risk to graft outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this review indicated that avoiding transfusions whenever possible is a sound management option that could prevent detrimental effects in patients awaiting kidney transplantation.

Human leukocyte antigen sensitization after transplant loss: timing of antibody detection and implications for prevention.

Graft failure is a major cause of broad sensitization but it is not clear whether sensitization occurs immediately after transplant loss or other factors (transfusions, nephrectomy, etc.) trigger it subsequently. Human leukocyte antigen antibodies were measured in 104 patients who lost a kidney transplant. The overall frequency of sensitization was 70%, with a similar rate in patients who lost the graft within 3 days. However, 81% of the patients did not have antibodies at the time of graft loss. Many patients underwent graft nephrectomy, had transfusions, and discontinued immunosuppression, obscuring possible individual effects of each factor. However, some patients without nephrectomy or transfusions made antibodies, whereas none of the patients continuing with immunosuppression did. The results suggest that some patients, such as those with live donors or otherwise candidates for prompt retransplantation, may benefit from continuing maintenance immunosuppression as a means of preventing sensitization after graft loss.

Effect of IVIG administration on complement activation and HLA antibody levels.

The objective of the present study was to determine if there are changes on complement (C) activation and concentration of HLA antibodies (Abs) in patients treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). The patients evaluated were given IVIG as treatment of Ab-mediated rejection or desensitization. The patients' sera obtained before and after IVIG administration were tested for their effects on the deposition of both IgG (HLA Abs) and C3b (C activation) as measured by flow cytometry on T cells. IVIG consistently inhibited C activation when measured shortly after IVIG infusion but returned to the initial levels at 2-4 weeks, when total serum IgG also returned to pre-infusion levels. C inhibition was more pronounced with higher IVIG doses and the degree of inhibition was inversely proportional to the HLA Ab concentrations. IVIG did not block the binding of HLA Abs immediately after administration, although levels were slightly but consistently lower after several monthly IVIG infusions. The data show that C inhibition by IVIG is short-lived and that IVIG induces only a mild reduction of HLA Abs, seen not immediately but after months of treatment. These results may explain the inconsistent results of IVIG to achieve desensitization.

Hypomethylating agent induction therapy followed by hematopoietic cell transplantation is feasible in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

Disease remission in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes can be achieved with azanucleosides, which act as pyrimidine analogs and hypomethylating agents. However, despite treatment with azanucleoside induction, patients with myelodysplastic syndromes nearly always relapse. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) can be curative, but it is risky. Given that azanucleosides affect human leukocyte antigen expression and lymphocyte reactivity, we conducted a retrospective study to define the impact of pre-HCT azanucleoside therapy on post-HCT donor chimerism. Patients receiving azanucleoside induction therapy achieved rapid and high levels of donor chimerism post-transplant. Lineage analysis also found rapid donor chimerism of lymphocyte and granulocyte subsets. These data indicate the feasibility of pretransplant azanucleoside therapy in patients who subsequently receive an HCT.

A lifetime versus a graft life approach redefines the importance of HLA matching in kidney transplant patients.

INTRODUCTION: Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching has been de-emphasized in the allocation of renal allografts and further discounting is planned in the new United Network of Organ Sharing kidney allocation model. An unforeseen consequence of poorer matching could be increased sensitization for candidates pursuing retransplantation. METHODS: We examined candidates listed in the United States from 1988 to 2007 from the Scientific Renal Transplant Registry (SRTR) database that were relisted after loss of a primary kidney transplant (n=15,980). The primary outcome was change in panel reactive antibody (PRA) from prior to recipient's initial transplant to the subsequent listing. Absolute change in PRA levels were examined in general linear models and the likelihood of becoming newly sensitized in logistic models. RESULTS: There was no appreciable change in PRA for patients receiving a first 0 HLA-A, -B, -DR, or 0 HLA-A, -B-mismatched kidney transplant; contrariwise, there was a significant increase in PRA by increasing HLA mismatch of the first transplant. Only 10% of patients became sensitized after a 0 HLA-A, -B-mismatched transplant, whereas the proportion rose up to 37% with increasing HLA mismatches. Other factors, notably younger age and African American race, also contributed to a higher PRA at relisting. CONCLUSIONS: Although there might be a limited impact of HLA matching on acute rejection and graft survival, many patients might be negatively impacted from poor HLA matching of their first kidney transplant when needing a second transplant. This might be particularly important in patients with a long life expectancy because of the high likelihood of needing a second transplant during their lifetime.

Effects of blood transfusions given after renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies produced after transplantation are frequently measured in transplant recipients, because they are strongly associated with humoral rejection and graft loss. However, antibodies can be induced by posttransplant blood transfusions rather than by the graft, casting doubts about the possible role of antibodies in a patient with graft dysfunction. METHODS: We recorded the posttransplant transfusions in 746 patients transplanted during a 6-year period. Rejection episodes were evaluated after exclusion of patients who were transfused proximate to the time of rejection. Specimens for solid-phase HLA antibody testing were available in 199 patients. RESULTS: The frequency of transfusions was 45%, but it was higher in deceased donor transplants (51%) than in live donor transplants (30%). Almost 80% of the transfusions were given during the first month after transplant. However, the incidence of posttransplant antibodies was similar in patients transfused and not transfused, and only 1 of 12 patients who received more than 10 transfusions produced antibodies. There was no evidence that posttransplant antibodies not directed to donor antigens were triggered by transfusions. The incidence of rejection episodes, allograft nephropathy, and graft loss was slightly more in transfused patients but the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: When HLA antibodies are detected posttransplant, they are likely induced by the graft rather than by any transfusions the patient may have received. The results suggest that posttransplant transfusions do not have the sensitizing or down-regulatory effects of pretransplant transfusions.

Measuring human complement activation by HLA antibodies.

CONTEXT: The clinical significance of HLA antibodies in transplantation depends on their ability to activate complement, which is measured by the standard complement-dependent cytotoxicity test. Recent reports indicate that C3b measurement on target cells may be a better indicator of human complement activation than standard cytotoxicity. OBJECTIVE: To determine the characteristics of the test, the role of other complement components, and the potential influence of the patient's own complement activity. DESIGN: The T-cell deposition of multiple complement components triggered by HLA alloantibodies was evaluated by flow cytometry using normal human serum as the source of complement. Complement activity in patients' sera was measured after activation with a standard antibody. RESULTS: When HLA antibodies activate complement, C3b deposition is usually highest, followed by that of C4b and C5b. Deposition of C1q, C3d, iC3b, or C5b-9 was low or undetectable in this study. The C5 was activated only when relatively high levels of C3b were present. There was a critical concentration of antibody, unique for each patient, below which activation of C3 declined abruptly. The complement activity in the serum of candidates for liver, heart, and lung transplantation that was tested with a standard antibody was similar to normal serum. In contrast, kidney transplant candidates exhibited higher complement activity. Unexpectedly, serum C3 activity was retained for at least 72 hours after collection. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of C3b, and in some instances C4b or C5b, offers a better definition of the ability of HLA antibodies to activate human complement than tests that are in current use. The results provide a necessary baseline to conduct clinical correlation studies.

IVIG and HLA antibodies. Evidence for inhibition of complement activation but not for anti-idiotypic activity.

The immediate effects of IVIG can be due to the presence of anti-idiotypic antibodies or inhibition of complement, but there is limited data about these possible mechanisms specifically on HLA antibodies (HLA Abs). Potential blocking activity of IVIG on HLA Ab binding and complement activation was investigated by flow cytometry. IVIG did not inhibit the IgG binding of any of 23 sera from sensitized patients containing Abs to several different HLA specificities. In contrast, IVIG produced significant dose-dependent complement inhibition. Low IVIG concentrations could be inhibitory if there was little C3 activation, but high concentrations were needed when C3 was activated more efficiently. The data do not support any significant contribution of anti-idiotypic antibodies against HLA Abs to the activity of IVIG. The results also highlight a relationship between the magnitude of C activation and the C inhibitory effect of IVIG.

Human leukocyte antigen antibodies and human complement activation: role of IgG subclass, specificity, and cytotoxic potential.

BACKGROUND: Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies are defined as complement (C) fixing and clinically relevant based upon the complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) test. However, the sub-lytic activation of individual C components is of critical biologic significance. The requirements of HLA antibodies to activate human C are not known. METHODS: IgG, IgM, IgG subclasses, and human C3b deposition upon T cells were evaluated by flow cytometry with sera from HLA-sensitized patients and human monoclonal HLA antibodies. RESULTS: Comparative studies showed that there was poor correlation between the amount of IgG on target cells and their ability to produce CDC. Human C3b deposition was influenced more by the particular serum/cell combination under study than by the amount of IgG, with some combinations showing high IgG and low C3b and others showing low IgG and high C3b. IgG1 was the predominant IgG subclass in all patients. The other subclasses were low or undetectable and did not correlate with C3b deposition. Human monoclonal HLA antibodies, mostly IgG1, did not activate human C efficiently despite high IgG binding. However, combinations of two monoclonal antibodies to different epitopes of the same antigen did produce significant C3b deposition. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to common assumptions, CDC, IgG binding, and IgG subclass are poor predictors of human C activation by HLA antibodies. The mix of specificities in a given serum and the antigens of a particular target cell appear to determine the efficiency of C activation. Measuring both antibody and C3b deposition (or other C component) may improve the assessment of donor-recipient compatibility.

The changing causes of graft loss and death after kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The results of kidney transplantation have improved markedly over the last three decades. Despite this, patients still lose grafts and die. We sought to determine whether the causes of graft loss and death have changed over the last 30 years. METHODS: We reviewed patients who underwent transplantation or who died between January 1, 1970 and December 31, 1999. We compared the causes of graft loss or death for three decades: 1970 to 1979, 1980 to 1989, and 1990 to 1999. RESULTS: From January 1, 1970 to December 31, 1999, we performed 2501 kidney transplantations in 2225 patients. For the three periods, 210, 588, and 383 patients lost their grafts, respectively. Graft survival increased substantially. Graft loss occurred later after transplantation, with 36.0% losing grafts in the first year during 1970 to 1970, 22.8% during 1980 to 1989, and 11.4% during 1990 to 1999. Death with a functioning graft increased from 23.8% for 1970 to 1979 to 37.5% for 1990 to 1999. Concomitantly, rejection as a cause of graft loss fell from 65.7% for 1970 to 1979 to 44.6% for 1990 to 1999. Approximately two thirds of the patients who died after transplantation died with a functioning graft and one third died after returning to dialysis. Cardiac disease as a cause of death increased from 9.6% for 1970 to 1979 to 30.3% for 1990 to 1999. Deaths from cancer and stroke also increased significantly over the three decades from 1.2% and 2.4%, respectively, for 1970 to 1979, to 13.2% and 8.0%, respectively, for 1990 to 1999. CONCLUSIONS: The causes of graft loss and death have changed over the last three decades. By better addressing the main causes of death, cardiac disease, and stroke with better prevention, graft loss due to death with a functioning graft will be reduced.

Improved flow cytometric detection of donor-specific HLA class II antibodies by heat inactivation.

Flow cytometry is a powerful technique for T-cell crossmatching but is prone to false-positive reactions with B cells. In this study the flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) was performed in 319 cases, using the patient's serum untreated and incubated at 56 degrees C for 30 minutes. Heat treatment inhibited B-cell reactivity in 30 of 39 cases. Flow cytometry testing with latex beads coated with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II antigens showed no class II antibodies in sera that were completely inhibited by heat treatment. There was no inhibition of class I antibodies to either T or B cells, or of class II antibodies to B cells. Experiments with aggregated IgG showed that inhibition by heat treatment is likely due to the prevention of complement binding to aggregates or dissociation of aggregates, or both. We conclude that heat inactivation is a simple step that eliminates false-positive reactions in the B-cell flow cytometry crossmatch.

Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab) therapy for acute cardiac humoral rejection: a case report.

Humoral or antibody-mediated rejection in cardiac transplant recipients is mediated by donor-specific cytotoxic antibodies and is histologically defined by linear deposits of immunoglobulin and complement in the myocardial capillaries. Antibody-mediated rejection often is accompanied by hemodynamic compromise and is associated with reduced long-term graft survival. Standard immunosuppression, designed to target T cell immune function, is largely ineffective against this B cell-driven process. Current treatment options for humoral rejection are limited by a lack of specific anti-B cell therapies. We present the case of a 50-year-old woman with hemodynamically significant humoral rejection resistant to steroids, cyclophos-phamide, and plasmapheresis who responded to the addition of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy (rituximab). One year posttransplant, the patient is rejection-free, with normal left ventricular systolic function and coronary arteries.

Obesity does not portend a bad outcome for kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant programs may avoid transplantation in obese patients because of reports indicating that obese patients have poorer outcomes than do nonobese patients. We recently reviewed our experience. METHODS: Patients receiving a kidney transplant between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 1999 were divided according to body mass index (BMI): group 1, BMI<25 (n=457); group 2, BMI> or =25 and <30 (n=278); and group 3, BMI> or =35 (n=98). RESULTS: Cadaveric graft survival rates at 2 years were 85% for group 1, 88% for group 2, and 85% for group 3 (P>0.10). Cadaveric patient survival rates at 2 years were 92% for group 1, 91% for group 2, and 94% for group 3 (P>0.10). There were no differences in technical losses or in posttransplantation wound complications. Group 3 patients, however, did have a higher incidence of steroid-induced posttransplantation diabetes mellitus than the other two groups (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: Obese transplant recipients have similar outcomes to nonobese patients.