Automated hand hygiene compliance system's audible alert reminder increases healthcare worker hand hygiene compliance.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of an automated hand hygiene compliance system (AHHCS) audible alert and vibration for increasing hand hygiene compliance. DESIGN: A nonrandomized, before-and-after, quasi-experimental study of an AHHCS was implemented in several inpatient units. Over a 51-day period, the system's real-time audible alert was turned on, off, and back on. Overall, hand hygiene compliance was compared between days with activated and deactivated alerts and vibration. SETTING: This study was conducted at a level 1 trauma center, a regional academic health system with 1,564 beds. PARTICIPANTS: The AHHCS was implemented in 9 inpatient units: 3 adult medical-surgical step-down units, and 6 adult intensive care units. The AHHCS badges were assigned to patient care assistants, registered nurses, physical therapists, occupational therapists, speech therapists, respiratory therapists, and physicians. INTERVENTION: In the 9 inpatient units, selected healthcare staff were issued wearable badges that detected entry into and exit from a patient room. The audible alert was turned on for 16 days, turned off for 17 days, and then turned back on for 18 days, for a total of 51 days. RESULTS: Utilization of the AHHCS real-time audible alert reminder resulted in sustained HH compliance ≥90%. When the alert and vibration were deactivated, HH compliance dropped to an average of 74% (range, 62%-78%). Once the alert resumed, HH compliance returned to ≥90%. CONCLUSION: Utilization of an AHHCS with real-time reminder audible alerts may be an effective method to increase healthcare worker HH compliance to ≥90%. Users of AHHCSs should consider the use of real-time reminders to improve HH compliance.

Surveillance testing reveals a significant proportion of hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 are asymptomatic.

BACKGROUND: The proportion of positive patients admitted to acute-care hospitals for reasons other than coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) is unknown. These patients potentially put other patients and healthcare workers at risk of infection. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to define the proportion of asymptomatic patients admitted with severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Secondary objectives were to define the positivity rate, reasons for admission, and the geographic distribution in the region. METHODS: Universal surveillance testing for SARS-CoV-2 was performed on patients admitted to this hospital over a 12-week period from April 9, 2020 to July 1, 2020. Positive patients were categorized as either symptomatic or asymptomatic as defined by the 11 criteria per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The positivity rate, proportion with and without symptoms, reasons for admission, and geographic distribution in the region were recorded. RESULTS: The positivity rate ranged from 0.8% to 6.2%. The proportion of asymptomatic patients with SARS-CoV-2 was 37%. Asymptomatic patients primarily presented to the hospital because of either trauma or labor. Some clusters in the region were identified of both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of asymptomatic patients admitted with SARS-CoV-2 was significant. Identifying and isolating asymptomatic patients likely prevented exposure and development of hospital-acquired COVID-19 cases among healthcare workers and other patients, supporting the universal surveillance of all admitted patients.

Root cause analysis of epidural spinal cord stimulator implant infections with resolution after implementation of an improved protocol for surgical placement.

BACKGROUND: Placing a spinal stimulator for the purpose of restoring paralysed function is a novel procedure; however, paralysis predisposes people to infection. Preventing surgical site infections is critical to benefit this population. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to review the root cause analysis of postoperative wound infections by a hospital epidemiology team following implantation of epidural spinal cord neurostimulators in patients with chronic spinal cord injury. METHODS: A team was assembled to review the case of every individual who had been enrolled to receive a neurostimulator at the facility. A root cause analysis was performed evaluating five categories: the patient; equipment; facility/environment; procedure; and personnel. FINDINGS: The root cause analysis included 11 patients. Two patients became infected. Three others dehisced their wound without becoming infected. All patients were given preoperative antibiotics on time. A mean of 17 personnel were in the operating room during surgery. Vancomycin powder was used in the patients who either dehisced their wound or became infected. CONCLUSIONS: The root cause analysis provides guidance for other institutions performing the same novel procedure. This analysis did not reveal a direct association, but did generate several areas for improvement including increasing pre-surgical screening, cleaning transient equipment (e.g., computer screens), limiting traffic in the operating room, using new sterile instruments for each stage of the procedure, not reopening the back incision, not applying vancomycin powder, and using an antimicrobial envelope for the stimulator.