Adaptation and Preliminary Validation of the Arabic Version of the Role Checklist Version 3 (RCv3).

Arab occupational therapists are in need either to develop their own outcome measures or to translate well-known outcome measures to their culture. The objective of this study was to translate, cross-culturally adapt, and validate preliminarily the Role Checklist Version 3 (RCv3) into Arabic language. The translation and cross-cultural adaptation process of the RCv3 into Arabic language was conducted in four main steps: (a) forward translation, (b) back translation, (c) expert panel review process, and (d) psychometric testing (Validity). The expert panel established the face validity and the content validity of the Arabic RCv3. Pilot testing was conducted, and the utility and content validity of the tool were confirmed. The final version of the Arabic RCv3 is now available for use in the Arab countries. However, further psychometric properties including reliability and responsiveness of this tool is warranted, thus supporting its wide use and proper application.

The Revised Role Checklist: Improved Utility, Feasibility, and Reliability.

The Role Checklist is used by occupational therapists across the globe. Developed in 1981 and consistent with the Model of Human Occupation (MOHO), until recently, the Role Checklist was not updated. This is of concern as the Role Checklist originally was established to measure role performance. In 2008, Kielhofner, in the fourth edition of A Model of Human Occupation, differentiated occupational performance in 10 roles which clearly fall into occupational participation in the Role Checklist Version 3. The objective of the study was to describe changes and establish utility, feasibility, and reliability of the Role Checklist Version 3. The Role Checklist Version 3 was administered electronically to N = 114 occupational therapists and students. A short time span was used due to sensitivity to history bias. Test-retest reliability using Cohen's Kappa and Cronbach's alpha mirrored analysis done on the original version. Qualitatively, nine themes emerged regarding utility and feasibility. Test-retest reliability is acceptable to excellent for present role incumbency (κ = 0.74-1.00), desired future role engagement (κ = 0.44-1.00), and satisfaction with performance (α = 0.77-0.98). Participants (91%) found it useful for treatment planning and 75% would recommend Version 3 over the original Role Checklist. Data support the Role Checklist Version 3 as a reliable, electronic instrument feasible for occupational therapists to measure participation.

A study of measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health with the Revised Role Checklist.

OBJECTIVE:: To empirically test the hypothesis that the 10 roles on the Revised Role Checklist are represented in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health participation areas. DESIGN:: Cross-sectional survey. SUBJECTS:: Investigators from Japan, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States recruited a total of 295 adults from the general population. There were 103 (34.9%) male and 191 (64.7%) female participants with one participant not indicating gender. The age distribution of participants was from <25 ( n = 68) to 75+ with a mode of 25-34 years. MAIN MEASURE:: The Revised Role Checklist Part 1 was used to assess perceived incumbency in 10 roles. In addition, subjects were asked to provide role examples. RESULTS:: Of the 7087 examples provided by participants, 6578 (92.8%) fit the original hypothesis that the roles in the Revised Role Checklist were covered in participation areas. Fit was determined when the role example was either named in the associated International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health participation area or when the criteria of: "does this example conceivably fit in the respective area as 'a person's involvement in life situations' fit relative to each role." Slight modification of the scope of three roles of the original hypothesis resulted in a 97.6% match. CONCLUSION:: The roles in the Revised Role Checklist are well represented in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health categories of participation.

Establishing Concurrent Validity of the Role Checklist Version 2 with the OCAIRS in Measurement of Participation: A Pilot Study.

Persons experiencing problems with adaptation following disease, disability, or overwhelming life circumstances are often referred by their physicians to occupational therapists. Given time constraints, therapists may skip administration of a client-centered participation focused assessment and instead use an impairment or limitation focused assessment. This approach assumes that skill remediation will naturally lead to return of participation in valued occupational roles because most participation measures take 30 minutes or longer. In response to the need for an efficient measure of desired role participation, this study establishes concurrent validity of the 10-15-minute Role Checklist Version 2 (RCV2: QP) with the 50 minute Occupational Circumstances Assessment And Rating Scale (OCAIRS) in measuring occupational participation in individuals recovering from surgery following liver transplantation. 20 subjects (mean age of 55 and a mean time-since-transplant of 5.2 months) completed both instruments. The hypothesis was supported (r = .63), showing concurrent validity between the OCAIRS and the RCV2: QP. This provides therapists with an efficient, client-centered measure of occupational participation for a client-centered treatment plan. Using the RCV2: QP in place of the OCAIRS provides a more efficient assessment tool for occupational therapists to set treatment goals and monitor client progress over time.

TeamSTEPPS Virtual Teams: Interactive Virtual Team Training and Practice for Health Professional Learners.

Medical errors because of communication failure are common in health care settings. Teamwork training, such as Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS), improves team performance and patient outcomes. Academic institutions seek high-quality, low-cost curricula for interprofessional education (IPE) to prepare learners for clinical experiences before and after graduation; however, most IPE curricula involve lectures, simple tabletop exercises, and in-person simulations and are not readily accessible to geographically distributed and asynchronously engaged learners. To address this need, interprofessional faculty from multiple institutions and specialties created a series of eight screen-based interactive virtual simulation cases featuring typical clinical situations, with the goal of preparing learners to provide safe and effective care in clinical teams. Virtual simulations permit flexible, asynchronous learning on the learner's schedule and allow educators an opportunity to identify gaps in knowledge and/or attitudes that can be addressed during class or forum discussions. In 2016, 1,128 unique users accessed the scenarios. As a result of such virtual activities, learner selection of the appropriate TeamSTEPPS tool increased with progression through the scenarios.

Measuring participation outcomes following life-saving medical interventions: the Role Checklist Version 2: Quality of Performance.

PURPOSE: To establish the Role Checklist Version 2: Quality of Performance as a measure of past, present and desired future role incumbency, role value and self-perception of the quality of role performance for 10 roles consistent with the ICF Participation Domains. METHODS: Discuss the literature on the measurement of participation; present a conceptually based case for similarities in content between the RC V2: QP; and illustrate through a case example its efficacy as a balanced measure of performance. RESULTS: Despite different origins, the ICF domain areas: Chapters 6-9 correspond to the roles included in the RC V2: QP. The measure is shown sensitive to change in quality of performance through insider self-report serving in the case provided, as an early indicator of deterioration in physical status. CONCLUSION: A balanced measure of the insider and outsider perspective of participation, the case of one liver transplant recipient illustrates how the RC V2: QP serves to reflect participation outcomes thus, adding an available measure of the ICF construct of participation. Implications for Rehabilitation The Role Checklist Version 2: Quality of Performance is consistent with the ICF performance qualifier of participation. The insider view of participation is strengthened in this Second version of the Role Checklist. The Role Checklist Version 2: Quality of Performance provides a general measure of participation that can be used across populations.

Resumption of valued activities in the first year post liver transplant.

ABSTRACT Current practice in education of transplant recipients includes general guidelines about return to involvement in life activities emphasizing medical precautions during wound healing and avoidance of activities that present risk of infection or rejection. This approach assumes patients gradually resume pre-transplant involvement in life activities: an assumption that has not been tested. Using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, this cross-sectional descriptive pilot study (n = 20) explored differences in the performance of activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, leisure, and productivity at three time periods within the first year. Results showed basic daily tasks are stable by the third month but some instrumental tasks declined by the end of the first year post transplant. Results indicated that there were significant differences in the Short Form-36 mental component score of the group performing "worse than expected" suggesting that preparation of recipients is needed to enable them to set realistic expectations. Results indicate the need for a longitudinal study of the resumption patterns of life activities for realistic expectations of recovery and guidelines for the treatment team.

Occupational therapy services to enable liver patients to thrive following transplantation.

ABSTRACT Transplantation is the only viable treatment for end-stage liver failure. With advances in biomedicine and surgical technique, survival rates have improved and current research is beginning to focus on patient-related outcomes such as of quality of life (QOL) and life satisfaction. However, attention to the rehabilitation needs of those patients whose lives are saved, is lagging. Pretransplantation, there are serious strains to role function and limitations to mental and physical capacity. Following transplantation, the ability to perform once easy familiar tasks is difficult for a prolonged recovery period. Within a year many people do well, others do not. Little has been done for this latter group. The purpose of this article is to systematically describe the contributions occupational therapy can make to the people struggling with the challenges faced during the transplantation process. The first part presents a framework for understanding the impact of end-stage liver disease, then the transplant, and the subsequent recovery through the combination of two frameworks: the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) and the Model of Human Occupation. The second part of this article will present the implications for occupational therapists throughout seven stages: (1) decline in health, (2) organ failure, (3) referral for transplantation, (4) the waiting period, (5) the transplant surgery, (6) recovery, and (7) return of health. Attention to the needs of transplant recipients who lack the adaptive skills to resume productive lifestyles has the capacity to improve participation outcomes for this population.