Effects of barnidipine in comparison with hydrochlorothiazide on endothelial function, as assessed by flow mediated vasodilatation in hypertensive patients.

BACKGROUND. In hypertensive patients, endothelial dysfunction is associated with an increased incidence of cardiovascular events. Calcium-channel antagonists can reverse impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation in different vascular districts, while conflicting results are found in the brachial artery. Aim. To investigate the effect of barnidipine in comparison with hydrochlorothiazide on endothelial function of hypertensives, as assessed by flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) of the brachial artery. METHODS. Patients with mild to moderate hypertension (age range 26-67 years) were randomized to receive barnidipine or hydrochlorothiazide. A thorough clinical examination, including blood pressure (BP) measurement, was performed at randomization as well as after 6, 12 and 24 weeks. FMD and 24-h BP monitoring was performed at randomization, after 12 and 24 weeks. RESULTS. After 12 and 24 weeks of treatment, a significant reduction in clinic BP was observed in both groups. Furthermore, a significant reduction in 24-h SBP and DBP was observed in patients receiving barnidipine but not in those receiving diuretic. The percentage change in FMD was different between the two groups of patients treated with barnidipine (at 12 weeks +1.2 ± 2.2%, p = 0.023 and at 24 weeks +1.25 ± 3.15%, p = 0.16 from baseline) or with hydrochlorothiazide (at 12 weeks -1.0 ± 3.0. p = 0.09 and at 24 weeks -1.78 ± 2.9%, p = 0.015 from baseline). A significant difference in FMD changes between the two groups was confirmed by analysis of covariance (p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS. In presence of a similar clinic BP reduction, an improvement of endothelial function was observed during treatment with barnidipine but not with hydrochlorothiazide, suggesting that the barnidipine may exert a favourable effect on endothelial dysfunction in hypertensive patients.

Effects of barnidipine on blood pressure and left ventricular diastolic function in patients with hypertension and metabolic syndrome: A 12-week, open-label noncomparison study.

BACKGROUND: Barnidipine is one of a new generation of dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers. Despite evidence of favorable effects on blood pressure (BP) and insulin sensitivity, this drug has rarely been tested in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome (MS). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of barnidipine on BP and left ventricular (LV) diastolic function in patients with hypertension and MS. METHODS: Consecutive subjects aged 18 to 75 years with systolic BP (SBP) of 140 to 179 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP (DBP) of 90 to 109 mm Hg and MS (based on Adult Treatment Panel III criteria) were assessed for inclusion in the study. Lifestyle changes according to current guidelines were recommended and barnidipine monotherapy 10 mg daily was initiated. All patients entered a 2-week run-in period. After a 6-week treatment period, the daily dosage was doubled for the remainder of the study in patients whose BP remained uncontrolled (≥140/≥90 mm Hg). We assessed the glycolipidic profile and LV structure and function using standard Doppler and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) echocardiography before and after 12 weeks of treatment. Ambulatory BP records and electrocardiographic and echocardiographic tracings were coded and shipped to a central laboratory for blinded analysis. Possible adverse events (AEs) were recorded at predetermined intervals throughout the follow-up period and at unplanned intervals whenever an AE became known to the investigators. RESULTS: Thirty-four consecutive patients were assessed for inclusion. Thirty consecutive patients (20 men, 10 women; mean {SD| age, 55.9 {10.3| years; 5 current smokers) were included in the study. At study entry, mean office SBP was 146 mm Hg, DBP was 87 mm Hg, and heart rate was 72 beats/min. At the study end, mean office SBP/DBP was <140/90 mm Hg in 20 patients (66.7%). From baseline to study end, 24-hour ambulatory BP decreased significantly by 12 and 8 mm Hg for SBP and DBP, respectively (both, P = 0.001). The smoothness index was 0.92 for SBP and 0.82 for DBP. Fasting plasma glucose concentration decreased significantly from 110 to 104 mg/dL (P = 0.001). Total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations did not change significantly. From baseline to study end, there were no significant changes in LV structure or systolic function (LV mass, 50.7 vs 50.6 g/ht(2.7); LV diastolic/systolic diameters, 47.50/29.80 vs 48.40/30.76 mm; wall motion score index, 1.0 vs 1.0; ejection fraction, 61% vs 60%), while the peak E/A velocity ratio on TDI increased from 1.078 to 1.245 (P = 0.009). No AEs (including AEs reflected by chemistry values) either unrelated or related to treatment were noted during the 12-week duration of the study. CONCLUSIONS: In these hypertensive patients with MS, a 12-week treatment period with barnidipine in addition to lifestyle modifications was associated with significant reductions in 24-hour BP and BP variability, reduction in plasma glucose concentration, and improvement in LV diastolic relaxation. No significant changes in lipid concentrations, LV structure, or systolic function were found.

Subjective impact of osteoarthritis flare-ups on patients' quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials on osteoarthritis (OA) flare-ups treatment usually focus only on objective measures of health status, albeit recent literature suggestions on the importance of patients' subjectivity. Aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of OA and of its different types of medical treatment(s) on Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in terms of both subjective satisfaction and functional status. METHODS: An observational study on prospective data collected from the Evaluation of Quality of life in OA (EQuO) clinical trial (April 1999-November 2000) was conducted; outpatients from 70 participating centers (Orthopedy or Rheumatology Departments in Italy) with a diagnosis of OA of the hip or knee were consecutively enrolled. Patients were observed at OA flare-ups (baseline) and at follow up 4 weeks after treatment. Patients' objective and subjective HRQoL were assessed by means of the SF-36 and the Satisfaction Profile (SAT-P, which focuses on subjective satisfaction); Present Pain at baseline and Pain Relief at follow up were also evaluated. RESULTS: Among the 1323 patients, 1138 (86%) were prescribed one drug/treatment of osteoarthritis, 169 (13%) 2 drugs/treatments, and 16 (1%) 3 drugs/treatments; most of treatments involved the prescription of NSAIDs; non-coxib, COX2 selective NSAIDs were prescribed in about 50% of patients. Follow-up visits were performed after 29.0 days on average (+/- 7.69 SD). For all SF-36 domains, all SAT-P items and factors, the differences between baseline and follow up scores resulted statistically significant (p < 0.001), enlighting an improvement both in health status and in subjective HRQoL. CONCLUSION: Besides the classic health status measures, the assessment of patients' subjective satisfaction provides important clues on treatments efficacy of OA within the patient-centered medicine model. In clinical practice this could lead to a better doctor-patient communication and to higher levels of treatment adherence.

The vascular effects of doxazosin in hypertension complicated by metabolic syndrome.

AIMS: To evaluate the vascular effects of doxazosin, an alpha-1 antagonist, in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome in whom the drug has previously been shown to exert beneficial metabolic actions on lipids and insulin metabolism. EXPERIMENTAL PROTOCOL: Twelve untreated non-diabetic hypertensive patients with National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) ATP-III defined metabolic syndrome were assigned to three-months of treatment with doxazosin (5.5 +/- 1.9 mg/die). Study variables were measured at baseline and after treatment. End-points: forearm blood flow (strain-gauge plethysmography) responses to graded intra-arterial acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside infusion to test endothelium-dependent and independent vasodilatation respectively. Minimum forearm vascular resistance, the ratio of mean blood pressure and post-ischaemic maximal blood flow, as an index of arteriolar structure; transcapillary albumin escape rate (the 1-h decay rate of I-albumin, 6-8 microC ev) as a measure of systemic capillary permeability. Lipids, fasting and post-glucose insulin were measured at baseline and after treatment. RESULTS: Doxazosin reduced blood pressure, augmented acetylcholine-mediated vasodilatation, decreased minimum resistance and, although not to a statistically significant extent, transvascular albumin leakage increased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol while triglycerides and post-stimulative hyperinsulinemia decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Doxazosin improved endothelial-mediated vasomotor function and reversed abnormal arteriolar structure in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome while improving lipid profile and blunting post-glucose hyperinsulinemia.

Iron plus folate is more effective than iron alone in the treatment of iron deficiency anaemia in pregnancy: a randomised, double blind clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether folate supplementation to iron is able to accelerate solving of iron deficiency anaemia in pregnancy. DESIGN: Multicentre, double blind, randomised clinical trial. SETTING: Nine hospital gynaecologic units located in Mexico. POPULATION: Three hundred seventy-one women with iron deficiency anaemia between 14 and 27 weeks of pregnancy. METHODS: Random allocation of the study population to receive 80 mg iron proteinsuccinylate, with or without 0.370 mg folinic acid daily for 60 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Haemoglobin concentration increase. RESULTS: Combined iron and folate therapy showed a better therapeutic response: the increase in haemoglobin levels from baseline was 1.42 (0.14) g/dL for women treated with both compounds vs 0.80 (0.125) g/dL for those given iron only (P < 0.001). A multivariable regression analysis showed that this effect was independent of basal levels of blood iron, ferritine and serum folate and was more evident in women with more severe anaemia. In the 64 women belonging to the subgroup defined by the per-protocol (PP) population and the lowest quartile of baseline haemoglobin values (mean 8.96, range 5.9-9.8 g/dL), the increase at day 60 was estimated 2.3 (0.53) g/dL for the combined therapy vs 0.5 (0.5) g/dL for iron only (P = 0.07). No significant differences in tolerability were observed between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Folate supplementation is recommendedin pregnant women with iron deficiency anaemia irrespective of the serum levels of folate.

A randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial of nimesulide-beta-cyclodextrin versus naproxen in patients with osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are the most widely used agents in the symptomatic treatment of osteoarthritis (OA). No data are presently available on the medium-term management of this disease with an on-demand treatment regimen, which nevertheless reflects medical practice. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare nimesulide-beta-cyclodextrin and naproxen in terms of short-term (2 weeks) pain control with scheduled dosing and medium-term (5.5 months) pain control with on-demand dosing in patients with OA. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled study, we compared 2 weeks of scheduled treatment plus 5.5 months of on-demand treatment in patients with OA of the hip and/or knee and moderate to severe pain, with no important concomitant disorders. Treatment consisted of nimesulide-beta-cyclodextrin (400 mg BID, orally = 100 mg nimesulide BID) or naproxen (500 mg BID). The primary outcome measures for scheduled dosing were pain on movement (measured by visual analog scale), morning stiffness score, Lequesne index, and adverse events. For on-demand dosing, the measures were the same as for scheduled dosing, plus duration of treatment and global assessment of efficacy and tolerability by patient and physician. RESULTS: After 2 weeks, there was equivalent reduction from baseline in pain on movement in the 2 treatment groups (nimesulide-beta-cyclodextrin, -41.5%; naproxen, -40.5%); the reduction was significant after 1 week (P < 0.001). The findings were also similar for the morning stiffness score and Lequesne index. There were no significant differences in mean duration of on-demand treatment (nimesulide-beta-cyclodextrin, 163.03 days; naproxen, 166.3 days) or in mean consumption of study drug (nimesulide-beta-cyclodextrin, 0.85 +/- 0.61 sachets/d; naproxen, 0.74 +/- 0.42 sachets/d). Withdrawal due to intolerance occurred in 8 patients given nimesulide-beta-cyclodextrin and 13 patients given naproxen, with no significant difference between groups; 3 and 12 patients, respectively, withdrew due to gastrointestinal intolerance, a finding that was significantly different between groups (P < 0.01). Global assessment of efficacy by patient and physician was similar for both drugs. Assessment of tolerability significantly favored nimesulide-beta-cyclodextrin on the physician assessments (P < 0.05) but was similar for the 2 drugs on the patient assessments (physicians, 46.9% vs 30.9%; patients, 43.5% vs 33.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that nimesulide-beta-cyclodextrin provides similar pain relief to naproxen in the management of OA of the hip and/or knee and is associated with fewer gastrointestinal adverse reactions. On-demand dosing may be an effective and well-tolerated low-dose regimen of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the maintenance of pain control in OA in the medium term.