Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Cancer Treat Rev ; 54: 110-121, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28242521

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To review the current knowledge on radiotherapy associated olfactory dysfunction among head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. METHODS: A systematic review of RT-related olfactory dysfunction in HNC was performed. Searches were conducted in several databases (Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, CAB Abstracts, SCOPUS, Proquest Dissertations and Theses, PROSPERO, ALLEBM Reviews - Cochrane DSR, ACP Journal Club, DARE, CCTR, CMR, HTA, and NHSEED). Publications investigating olfactory dysfunction as an explicit side effect of Radiotherapy (RT, or RT-chemo or RT-monoclonal antibodies) were eligible, no limits were applied. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-nine papers were screened and 23 met inclusion criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Odor detection, identification and discrimination are olfactory functions impaired after RT for HNC. An RT dose-effect has been calculated for odor identification and odor discrimination. There were no studies of the effect of olfactory dysfunction on weight loss or energy intake among RT-treated HNC patients. To improve our understanding of RT associated olfactory dysfunction among HNC patients, future studies should include a multi-dimensional assessment of olfactory function in a longitudinal design, track other conditions affecting olfaction, assess retronasal olfactory perception, adopt validated self-report tools and explore the impact of olfactory dysfunction on the eating experience of HNC patients.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Olfaction Disorders/etiology , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Humans
2.
Eur J Oncol Nurs ; 22: 54-62, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27179893

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Dietary advice for post treatment head and neck cancer (HNC) patients emphasizes food characteristics of nutritional value and texture, and not patients' characterization of food. The aim of this study was to determine patients' characterization of food. METHODS: Repertory grid interviews were conducted with 19 orally-fed HNC patients between 4 and 10 months post-treatment to characterize foods commonly eaten, avoided and eaten sometimes. Patients compared and rated 12 foods using their own descriptors. Data were analyzed by General Procrustes Analysis (GPA). Socio-demographic status, taste and smell alterations, appetite and food intake data were also collected. Patient physical symptom burden was defined by University of Washington-Quality of Life Physical Function domain scores and used to stratify patients with "less physical symptom burden" (n = 11, score ≥ 61.7) or "greater physical symptom burden" (n = 8, score < 61.7). RESULTS: All patients used descriptors of taste, ease of eating, convenience, texture, potential to worsen symptoms and liking to characterize foods. Overall, avoided foods were characterized as having dry texture, while foods commonly eaten were characterized by their ease of eating and low potential to worsen symptoms. Descriptors of nutrition and smell were significant only for patients with greater physical symptom burden. CONCLUSIONS: Physical symptom burden influenced the characterization of foods among post-treatment HNC patients. Nutrition counseling must consider patients' physical symptom burden and the subsequent characterization of food that drive food selection or avoidance to facilitate dietary advice for adequate, appropriate and enjoyable food intake.


Subject(s)
Food Preferences , Head and Neck Neoplasms/complications , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Aged , Appetite , Diet , Eating , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/psychology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nutritional Status , Quality of Life
3.
Qual Life Res ; 25(6): 1495-504, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26589527

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Taste and smell alterations (TSAs) are among the most frequent and troublesome symptoms reported by head and neck cancer (HNC) patients after treatment. Little is known about the relationship between TSAs and quality of life (QoL) among HNC patients. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of TSAs on overall QoL among tube-fed and orally fed HNC patients before treatment, at end of treatment and at 2.5-month follow-up. METHODS: Data were collected in a longitudinal study prior to treatment (n = 126), at end of treatment (n = 100) and at 2.5-month follow-up (n = 85). Chemosensory Complaint Score (CCS) and the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire version 3 were used to assess TSAs and QoL, respectively. Generalized estimated equation modeling was used to estimate the effect of CCS on QoL. RESULTS: At end of treatment, QoL and CCS had declined for both tube-fed and orally fed patients and thereafter improved, but not to pre-treatment levels. Neither QoL nor CCS mean scores were different between the two groups at any time point. CCS was a significant predictor of overall QoL (ß = -1.82, p < 0.0001), social-emotional (ß = -1.76, p < 0.0001), physical (ß = -1.12, p < 0.0001) and overall functions (ß = -1.15, p < 0.0001) at a multivariate level. Taste was reported as an important symptom for both tube-fed and orally fed groups at end of treatment and follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: TSAs are an important symptom and an independent predictor of QoL for both tube-fed and orally fed HNC patients. HNC patients need support to manage TSAs, regardless of the method of nutritional intake.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Olfaction Disorders/pathology , Quality of Life/psychology , Smell/physiology , Taste Disorders/pathology , Taste/physiology , Adult , Aged , Enteral Nutrition/psychology , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
Curr Oncol ; 21(5): e704-14, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25302041

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The treatment of head-and-neck cancer is complex and requires the involvement of various health care professionals with a wide range of expertise. We describe the process of developing a practice guideline with recommendations about the organization and delivery of health care services for head-and-neck cancer patients in Alberta. METHODS: Outcomes of interest included composition of the health care team, qualification requirements for team members, cancer centre and team member volumes, infrastructure needs, and wait times. A search for existing practice guidelines and a systematic review of the literature addressing the organization and delivery of health care services for head-and-neck cancer patients were conducted. The search included the Standards and Guidelines Evidence (sage) directory of cancer guidelines and PubMed. RESULTS: One practice guideline was identified for adaptation. Three additional practice guidelines provided supplementary evidence to inform guideline recommendations. Members of the Alberta Provincial Head and Neck Tumour Team (consisting of various health professionals from across the province) provided expert feedback on the adapted recommendations through an online and in-person review process. Selected experts in head-and-neck cancer from outside the province participated in an external online review. SUMMARY: The recommendations outlined in this practice guideline are based on existing guidelines that have been modified to fit the Alberta context. Although specific to Alberta, the recommendations lend credence to similar published guidelines and could be considered for use by groups lacking the resources of appointed guideline panels. The recommendations are meant to be a guide rather than a fixed protocol. The implementation of this practice guideline will depend on many factors, including but not limited to availability of trained personnel, adequate funding of infrastructure, and collaboration with other associations of health care professionals in the province.

5.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 51(1): 23-30, 2001 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11516847

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Population-based cancer registries can permit the study of the survivorship of all patients with a particular diagnosis regardless of patterns of referral and practice within a specific geographic distribution. The purpose of this study is to describe the patterns of care, outcome, and prognostic factors for bladder cancer in the northern region of the province of Alberta, Canada, between 1984 and 1993. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1984 and 1993, 184 patients from northern Alberta were identified from the Alberta Cancer Registry as having undergone curative treatment for biopsy-proven muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Data were obtained, by retrospective chart review, regarding the staging, pathology, treatment, and outcome of patients treated in the northern Alberta cities of Edmonton, Grande Prairie, and Red Deer, regardless of the responsible treating institution. The prognostic significance of patient-, tumor-, and treatment-related variables were tested using univariate and multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional-hazard model. RESULTS: As the primary treatment modality, 74 patients (40%) received radical radiotherapy (RT) without surgery; surgery was used alone in 81 patients (44%), and was combined with preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy in 29 patients (16%). Seventy-three (40%) patients also received concurrent, neoadjuvant, or adjuvant chemotherapy. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of median survival was 2.2 years, and the 5-year overall survival was 30%. Univariate analysis demonstrated the prognostic significance of T classification (p < 0.001), lymph node involvement (p < 0.001), complete response to RT (p = 0.001), hydronephrosis (p = 0.017), and vascular/lymphatic involvement (p = 0.035). Multivariate analysis revealed the following to have a significant association with survival: T classification (p = 0.001), lymph node involvement (p = 0.004), complete response to RT (p = 0.054), hydronephrosis (p = 0.019), and use of chemotherapy in the treatment regimen (p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: The strongest prognostic factors in this study were tumor related, and no significant differences in survival were detected between patients treated with primary surgery vs. organ-preservation approaches. A survival advantage associated with the incorporation of chemotherapy into the management schema was detected on multivariate, but not univariate, analysis. Stratification of patients based on tumor characteristics is imperative in clinical trials for invasive bladder cancer. Novel treatment approaches are required to improve survival further in patients with apparently localized disease.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/therapy , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/mortality , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analysis of Variance , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/pathology , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Combined Modality Therapy , Cystectomy/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Radiotherapy , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology
6.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 48(4): 983-9, 2000 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11072154

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To develop an effective and resource-efficient radiotherapy technique to treat the breast and regional nodes, including the ipsilateral internal mammary nodes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighty female patients who underwent MRI scans for a variety of indications had coronal, T1-weighted images of the chest performed to determine the position of the internal mammary chain (IMC). Based on these results, a 5-field treatment technique was developed that would include the breast, supraclavicular fossa, and ipsilateral IMC, while maintaining a low dose to the heart, lungs, and contralateral breast. This technique was implemented in a cohort of 13 patients. RESULTS: The lateral position of the right and left IMC were measured in three cephalo-caudad positions: at the clavicular heads, upper manubrium, and midsternum (at the 2nd/3rd rib interspace). The mean lateral separation between the right and left IMC chains at each level (and 95% confidence interval) at each level were 5.8 cm (4.67-7.00), 5.6 cm (4.49-6.73), and 5.9 cm (4.66-7.19), respectively. Treatment was delivered to 13 patients using a 5-field technique, with tangential photon fields for the breast, anterior and posterior supraclavicular/axillary field, and a matching anterior electron field. Three-dimensional treatment planning of a representative case confirmed adequate coverage of the planning target volume (PTV). The median dose to the whole heart was 10 Gy, and 20% of the ipsilateral lung received more than 20 Gy. Seven of the 13 patients treated experienced moist desquamation at the junction of the electron field and breast tangents, and 1 patient had persistent ulceration at 3 months' follow-up. CONCLUSION: The 5-field technique described in this paper provides good coverage to the breast and regional nodes with acceptable toxicity, and without requiring three-dimensional treatment planning or intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy, Conformal/methods , Axilla , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Clavicle , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Lymph Nodes , Lymphatic Metastasis/diagnostic imaging , Lymphatic Metastasis/radiotherapy , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Radiotherapy Dosage , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...