Clinical evaluation of seven anticalculus dentifrice formulations.

One hundred ninety-two subjects completed a clinical trial to determine the effects of seven dentifrice formulations on calculus inhibition. The double-blind study involved a ten-day control phase and a ten-day experimental phase. For the control phase, subjects were evaluated for calculus present, received a prophylaxis and had pre-weighed mylar strips attached to the lingual surfaces of the mandibular incisors to harvest mineral deposits. Subjects were then assigned the placebo dentifrice for unsupervised twice-daily use and were required to report once a day for a supervised mouthrinse using a 1:3 dilution of the dentrifice. The experimental phase was identical except that subjects were allocated the experimental dentifices using a stratified random assignment based on age, gender and the initial presence of calculus. Simple linear regression analyses of the dry and ash log weights obtained from the strips were performed. The results showed no statistically significant differences among the test products; however, two formulations containing zinc citrate showed some calculus inhibition-potential suggesting that further research and development of such products may be warranted.

Accuracy of student self-evaluations of dental sealants.

The purpose of this study was to (1) assess the accuracy of student self-evaluations of dental sealants through comparisons with faculty evaluations, and (2) determine if a difference in accuracy exists between dental and dental hygiene students. Dental (n = 17) and dental hygiene (n = 13) students from the University of North Carolina School of Dentistry at Chapel Hill placed and evaluated a total of 127 dental sealants on 29 patients in the undergraduate patient care system. Each student evaluated the placed sealant using criteria for the characteristics: area covered, quantity, porosity, and retention. The student self-evaluation was followed by an evaluation performed by two faculty examiners using the same criterion-referenced evaluation. The average of the two faculty evaluations was compared with the student's self-evaluation for analyses. Results indicated student scores were consistently higher than those given by the faculty. Additionally, dental and dental hygiene student scores correlated to about the same degree with the faculty average score.

TMD symptomology among denture patients.

The relationship between denture wearing and symptoms of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) was assessed with a psychometric test specifically developed to measure TMD symptoms. The subjects were 278 denture patients and 36 elderly patients with a diagnosed TMD. Denture wearers were found to have a higher prevalence of TMD symptoms than the normal population, but the average level of symptoms was of low intensity and not clinically significant. Denture wearers reported fewer TMD symptoms and less stress and psychological distress than TMD patients. Responses to test items assessing perceived malocclusion apparently were not affected by denture wearing.

Juvenile diabetics' oral health and locus of control. A pilot study.

The purpose of this pilot study program was to evaluate the effects of a one-year dental health education program on the oral health status and locus of control of juvenile diabetic children. Thirty subjects with juvenile diabetes mellitus were allocated to control and experimental treatment groups so that group frequencies (age, sex, race, duration of diabetes) were similar. Both groups had a Silness and Loe Plaque Index (PLI) and a Ramfjord Periodontal Disease Index (PDI) performed, and received an oral prophylaxis three times over the one-year period. Locus of control was measured at baseline and one year using the Children's Health Locus of Control Scale. In addition, the experimental group received an extensive dental health education program which emphasized the effects of dental disease on diabetes control. Twenty-five subjects completed the study. Pre- and post-locus of control measures were analyzed using the Wilcoxon Matched Pairs Signed Rank test. The Mann Whitney U Test was used to analyze differences between the groups. Indexes were compared using nonparametric two-factor repeated measures analysis of variance. Analysis revealed no statistically significant differences between groups or in locus of control scores over time. However, PDI and PLI scores improved in both groups, particularly from baseline to six months (p less than .01). Although not statistically significant, both groups exhibited a high internal locus of control. While the dental health education program resulted in only minor improvements in mean group scores, the intervention of preventive treatment produced significant improvement in measured indexes.

Effects of specific criteria and calibration on examiner reliability.

The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate the use of specific criteria and examiner calibration on the reliability of inexperienced examiners on dental sealant evaluations. Dental (N = 8) and dental hygiene (N = 8) students participated as examiners. The study objectives were to identify differences in calibrated and non-calibrated examiners, examiners calibrated by an expert or non-expert, and reliability between dental and dental hygiene student examiners. A criterion-referenced evaluation form was used to evaluate dental sealant end product on 20 teeth, twice by each examiner. Eight of 16 examiners participated in a one-hour calibration session between evaluations. The session consisted of a discussion of operational definitions, the evaluation procedure for dental sealants, and use of the criterion-referenced form. Intra- and interexaminer reliabilities were measured. There were no statistically significant differences (p less than .05) in intraexaminer reliability. Although calibration produced no significant increase in interexaminer reliability, the post-training reliability scores for the group calibrated by an expert decreased, and scores for the group calibrated by a non-expert increased. No significant difference was found in reliability between dental and dental hygiene student examiners.

Evaluation of teaching performance in U.S. dental schools.

This study examines how teaching performance is evaluated in U.S. dental schools. Respondents to the mailed survey were dental school deans. Most schools formally evaluate teaching through student evaluation, yet most deans agreed that evaluation should include input from students and peers. Features that were considered most important in an evaluation program included the provision of a feedback mechanism, the inclusion of faculty input, and a standardization of the evaluation system. The majority of schools provide a program to enhance teaching skills; responsibility for the program varied from the department chairperson to the individual faculty member. More than half of the deans indicated that research productivity can "outweigh" teaching skills in promotion and tenure decisions. The results indicate that dental school deans expect excellence in teaching, but leave doubt as to how faculty members are to gain expertise in this realm of their profession.

The reliability of three methods for evaluating dental sealants.

Three evaluation instruments (global, check-list, and criterion referenced) were used by experienced and inexperienced examiners to evaluate dental sealant end products on 40 extracted teeth. Intra- and interexaminer reliabilities were measured. Experienced examiners achieved higher intrarater reliabilities with all three evaluation instruments than did inexperienced examiners. The highest intraexaminer agreement for all examiners occurred with use of the global evaluation. The highest interexaminer reliability was achieved with the second use of the criterion-referenced evaluation by the experienced examiner. Interexaminer reliability was improved for both types of examiners with the criterion-referenced evaluation.