Sex Does Not Affect Changes in Body Composition and Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I During US Army Basic Combat Training.

ABSTRACT: Roberts, BM, Staab, JS, Caldwell, AR, Sczuroski, CE, Staab, JE, Lutz, LJ, Reynoso, M, Geddis, AV, Taylor, KM, Guerriere, KI, Walker, LA, Hughes, JM, and Foulis, SA. Sex does not affect changes in body composition and insulin-like growth factor-I during US Army basic combat training. J Strength Cond Res 38(6): e304-e309, 2024-Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-I) has been implicated as a biomarker of health and body composition. However, whether changes in body composition are associated with changes in IGF-I is unclear. Therefore, we examined the relationship between body composition changes (i.e., fat mass and lean mass) and total serum IGF-I levels in a large cohort of young men ( n = 809) and women ( n = 397) attending US Army basic combat training (BCT). We measured body composition using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and total serum IGF-I levels during week 1 and week 9 of BCT. We found that pre-BCT lean mass ( r = 0.0504, p = 0.082) and fat mass ( r = 0.0458, p = 0.082) were not associated with pre-BCT IGF-I. Body mass, body mass index, body fat percentage, and fat mass decreased, and lean mass increased during BCT (all p < 0.001). Mean (± SD ) IGF-I increased from pre-BCT (176 ± 50 ng·ml -1 ) to post-BCT (200 ± 50 ng·ml -1 , p < 0.001). Inspection of the partial correlations indicated that even when considering the unique contributions of other variables, increases in IGF-I during BCT were associated with both increased lean mass ( r = 0.0769, p = 0.023) and increased fat mass ( r = 0.1055, p < 0.001) with no sex differences. Taken together, our data suggest that although changes in IGF-I weakly correlated with changes in body composition, IGF-I, in isolation, is not an adequate biomarker for predicting changes in body composition during BCT in US Army trainees.

NSAIDs do not prevent exercise-induced performance deficits or alleviate muscle soreness: A placebo-controlled randomized, double-blinded, cross-over study.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are frequently consumed by athletes to manage muscle soreness, expedite recovery, or improve performance. Despite the prevalence of NSAID use, their effects on muscle soreness and performance, particularly when administered prophylactically, remain unclear. This randomized, double-blind, counter-balanced, crossover study examined the effect of consuming a single dose of each of three NSAIDs (celecoxib, 200 mg; ibuprofen, 800 mg; flurbiprofen, 100 mg) or placebo 2 h before on muscle soreness and performance following an acute plyometric training session. Twelve healthy adults, aged 18-42 years, completed a standardized plyometric exercise session consisting of 10 sets of 10 repetitions at 40 % 1-repetition maximum (1RM) on a leg press device. During exercise, total work, rating of perceived exertion, and heart rate were measured. Maximum voluntary contraction force (MVC), vertical jump height, and muscle soreness were measured before exercise and 4-h and 24-h post-exercise. We found no significant differences in total work, heart rate, or rating of perceived exertion between treatments. Additionally, no significant differences in muscle soreness or vertical jump were observed between treatments. Ibuprofen and flurbiprofen did not prevent decrements in MVC, but celecoxib attenuated decreases in MVC 4-h post exercise (p < 0.05). This study suggests that athletes may not benefit from prophylactic ibuprofen or flurbiprofen treatment to prevent discomfort or performance decrements associated with exercise, but celecoxib may mitigate short-term performance decrements.