Long COVID-19 symptoms: Clinical characteristics and recovery rate among non-severe outpatients over a six-month follow-up.

BACKGROUND: To describe persistent symptoms in long COVID-19 non-severe outpatients and report the 6-month clinical recovery (CR) rate. METHODS: Observational study enrolling outpatients (≥ 18 years) with confirmed non-severe COVID-19 (positive nasopharyngeal RT-PCR or presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies) who consulted for persistent symptoms after the first pandemic wave (March-May 2020). CR was assessed at the 6-month visit and defined as complete (no symptom), partial (persistent symptoms of lower intensity) or lack of recovery (no improvement). RESULTS: Sixty-three patients (79% women, mean age: 48 years) enrolled; main symptoms (mean 81 days after acute infection): asthenia/myalgia (77%), dyspnea (51%), headaches (35%), cough (33%). At 6 months (n=56), 30% had complete, 57% partial, and 13% lack of recovery. The proportion of patients with>2 persistent symptoms was 26% at 6 months (main symptoms: dyspnea [54%] and asthenia/myalgia [46%]). CONCLUSION: We observed a slow but high recovery rate at 6 months among these outpatients.

Prevalence and factors associated with symptom persistence: A prospective study of 429 mild COVID-19 outpatients.

INTRODUCTION: Persistent symptoms have recently emerged as a clinical issue in COVID-19. We aimed to assess the prevalence and risk factors in symptomatic non-hospitalized individuals with mild COVID-19. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study of symptomatic COVID-19 outpatients, from March to May 2020, with weekly phone calls from clinical onset until day 30 and up to day 60 in case of persistent symptoms. The main outcomes were the proportion of patients with complete recovery at day 30 and day 60 and factors associated with persistent symptoms. RESULTS: We enrolled 429 individuals mostly women (72.5%) and healthcare workers (72.5%), with a median age of 41.6 years [IQR 30-51.5]. Symptoms included: cough (69.7%), asthenia (68.8%), anosmia (64.8%), headaches (64.6%), myalgia (62.7%), gastrointestinal symptoms (61.8%), fever (61.5%), and ageusia (60.8%). Mean duration of disease was 27 days (95%CI: 25-29). The rate of persistent symptoms was 46.8% at day 30 and 6.5% at day 60 consisting in asthenia (32.6%), anosmia (32.6%), and ageusia (30.4%). The probability of complete recovery was 56.3% (95%CI: 51.7-61.1) at day 30 and 85.6% (95%CI: 81.2-89.4) at day 60. Factors associated with persistent symptoms were age>40 (HR 0.61), female sex (HR 0.70), low cycle threshold (HR 0.78), and ageusia (HR 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 - even in its mild presentation - led to persistent symptoms (up to one month) in nearly half of individuals. Identification of risk factors such as age, gender, ageusia and viral load is crucial for clinical management and argues for the development of antiviral agents.

Olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions in COVID-19 outpatients: A prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics, evolution and risk factors for long-term persistence of olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions (OGD) in COVID-19 outpatients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in SARS-CoV-2 infected outpatients with OGD. Weekly phone interviews were set up starting from COVID-19 onset symptoms and over the course of 60 days, using standardized questionnaires that included a detailed description of general symptoms and OGD. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with complete recovery of OGD at D30. Rate and time to recovery of OGD, as well as risk factors for late recovery (>30 days), were evaluated using Cox regression models. RESULTS: Ninety-eight outpatients were included. The median time to onset of OGD after first COVID-19 symptoms was 2 days (IQR 0-4). The 30-day recovery rate from OGD was 67.5% (95% CI 57.1-75.4) and the estimated median time of OGD recovery was 20 days (95% CI 13-26). Risk factors for late recovery of OGD were a complete loss of smell or taste at diagnosis (HR=0.26, 95% CI 0.12-0.56, P=0.0005) and age over 40 years (HR=0.56, 95% CI 0.36-0.89, P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 patients with complete loss of smell or taste and over age 40 are more likely to develop persistent OGD and should rapidly receive sensorial rehabilitation.

Persistent low-level viraemia in antiretroviral treatment-experienced patients is not linked to viral resistance or inadequate drug concentrations.

OBJECTIVES: To assess genotypic sensitivity scores (GSSs), plasma antiretroviral concentrations (PACs) and immunovirological outcomes at Week 96 (W96) in patients with persistent low-level viraemia (LLV). METHODS: On 1 January 2017, we analysed data from patients on three-drug regimens with persistent LLV defined as at least two consecutive plasma viral loads (pVLs) between 21 and 200 copies/mL (including one pVL of ≥50 copies/mL), at the Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital. Outcomes were: GSS, PACs and HIV-DNA load at study entry; and virological status and proportion of patients with resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) at W96. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were included, with median age of 52.6 years (IQR 45.2-57.9), last CD4 count of 658 cells/mm3 (IQR 462-909) and total ART duration of 10.2 years (IQR 5.7-15.2). LLV duration was 14.0 months (IQR 5.5-22.3). GSS was 3 in 46/57 (81%) patients and PACs were adequate in 53/57 (93%) patients. Median total HIV-DNA was 2.65 log10 copies/106 cells (IQR 2.44-2.86). During follow-up, 26/57 (46%) had experienced ART modifications. At W96, 38/57 (67%) patients remained with LLV, 15/60 (26%) had achieved confirmed pVL of <20 copies/mL and 4/57 (7%) had virological failure. The four virological failures were due to three ART interruptions and one incomplete adherence (selection of Y181C RAM). No factors (patient characteristics at study entry, GSS, PACs, total HIV-DNA load and ART modification) were associated with W96 viral outcome, except for time from HIV diagnosis and the LLV duration at study entry. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of patients harbouring LLV had no resistance to ART and adequate PACs. Two-thirds of these patients remained with this LLV status.

Long-term follow-up of HIV-infected patients on dolutegravir monotherapy.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, dolutegravir monotherapy has been explored as a drug-reduced regimen for HIV patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study, including patients virologically suppressed for ≥6 months, without previous virological failure (VF) under integrase inhibitors (INIs), who had been switched to dolutegravir monotherapy (50 mg/day). The primary aim was to report the proportion of VF at week 48 (W48) and week 96 (W96) of dolutegravir monotherapy. The evolution from baseline to W48 of residual viraemia on ultra-deep sequencing and HIV DNA was also evaluated. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were included. Prior to switching to dolutegravir monotherapy, they had a median (IQR) of 15.4 (6.5-19.9) years of antiretroviral exposure, 5.8 (3.2-10.3) years of viral suppression and 687 (461-848) CD4+ cells/mm3. They remained on dolutegravir monotherapy for a median (IQR) of 100 (29-148) weeks. Forty-two out of 61 patients (68.9%) reached W48 and 32 out of 61 patients (52.5%) reached W96. VF occurred in three patients, with the emergence of INI resistance. VF occurred before W24 and in patients pre-exposed to INIs. At W48, the probability of VF (Kaplan-Meier analysis) was 5.6% (95% CI = 1.8%-16.4%). The same result was obtained at W96. Detectable residual viraemia did not increase and median HIV DNA did not change significantly (2.4 log/106 cells at baseline and 2.3 log/106 cells at W48). Dolutegravir plasma concentration was above the IC90 in 41/41 samples, from 22 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up showed a low risk of VF under dolutegravir monotherapy, in a selected population of patients with previous long-term virological suppression and low HIV reservoir.

Darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy at a low dose (600/100 mg/day) in HIV-1-infected individuals with suppressed HIV viraemia.

Background: Darunavir/ritonavir is a potent PI with a high genetic barrier and pharmacological robustness favourably investigated as monotherapy. Whether darunavir could be dose reduced in the context of monotherapy deserves investigation. Methods: Patients with HIV suppressed viraemia (plasma viral load <50 copies/mL for 12 months) under ART who had switched to darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy at 600/100 mg/day between 2013 and 2015 were included in this observational 48 week single-centre study. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with virological success (defined as plasma viral load <50 copies/mL) at week 24. Secondary outcomes included treatment strategy success and resistance. Results: Thirty-one patients were included with the following baseline characteristics [median (IQR)]: age 52 years (47-57), CD4+ 649 cells/mm3 (463-813), ART duration 16.3 years (9.2-22.3), nadir CD4+ 195 cells/mm3 (144-261) and duration of HIV suppression 7.8 years (4.8-9.7). Prior to switch, ART consisted of PI monotherapy for 28 of 31 patients [darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg/day (n = 26), lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 1) and atazanavir/ritonavir (n = 1)] and a triple drug regimen for 3 of 31 patients. Within the 48 weeks of follow-up, no virological failure occurred and two patients discontinued 600/100 mg of darunavir/ritonavir due to side effects at week 16 and 40, leading to a virological suppression rate of 100% (95% CI = 89-100) at weeks 24 and 48. Strategy success rates were 96.8% (95% CI = 83.3-99.9) at week 24 and 93.5% (95% CI = 78.6-99.2) at week 48. Median (IQR) Ctrough values of 800/100 mg of darunavir/ritonavir and 600/100 mg of darunavir/ritonavir were 1537 ng/mL (1286-1724) and 1255 ng/mL (873-2161), respectively. Conclusions: A lower dose of darunavir/ritonavir used as monotherapy (600/100 mg/day) was highly effective in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients. Further studies are needed to confirm these data.

Rapid plasma viral suppression in naive HIV-infected patients with high CD4 cells and low viraemia initiating a dual nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor strategy: a proof-of-concept study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether a dual nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) strategy can control HIV replication in antiviral therapy (ART)-naive HIV-infected patients with a high CD4 cell count and a low viral load (VL). METHODS: This observational study included all HIV-infected treatment-naive patients with a CD4 cell count >300 cells/mm(3), a plasma HIV RNA between 1000 copies/mL and 30,000 copies/mL and wild-type virus who initiated dual NRTI ART between January 2008 and December 2012. HIV RNA and CD4 cell count were assessed at Day 0, Week (W) 4, W12, W24 and W48. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a plasma VL (pVL) <50 copies/mL at W24. RESULTS: Twenty patients were included. The median (IQR) baseline characteristics were: time since HIV diagnosis, 25 months (8-66 months); CD4 cell count, 592 cells/mm(3) (405-798 cells/mm(3)); HIV RNA, 10,395 copies/mL (4106-16,566 copies/mL); and HIV DNA, 464 copies/10(6) peripheral blood mononuclear cells (195-1168 copies/10(6) PBMC). Nineteen patients received tenofovir/emtricitabine and one patient received abacavir/lamivudine. At W12, 88% of the patients with available data (n = 16/18, 95% CI 0.65-0.99) had a pVL <50 copies/mL. Overall, the proportion of patients with a pVL <50 copies/mL was 100% (n = 20/20, 95% CI 0.83-1.0) at W24 and 95% (n = 18/19, 95% CI 0.74-0.99) at W48 (with one patient lost to follow-up and one patient with poor treatment compliance). The median increase in CD4 cells was 83 cells/mm(3) (40-310 cells/mm(3)). There was no discontinuation of antiretroviral therapy for any reason such as lack of efficacy or toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that, in patients with a high CD4 cell count and a low VL, a dual NRTI strategy may represent a potentially effective treatment strategy to control HIV replication. This needs to be confirmed in larger controlled clinical studies.