ABSTRACT
This laboratory study investigated the hypotheses that there is no difference between three implant level impression techniques using vinyl polysiloxane impression material. The tested techniques were 1)- the repositioning technique. 2)-The pickup technique. 3)- The pickup technique with the impression copings splinted to the impression trays with autopolymerising acrylic resin. The Reflex Microscope was used for 3D measurement of distances and angles. Analysis of variance and Tukey's multiple comparisons test were applied to analyse the data. The results showed significant differences in implant analogue position with the repositioning and the pickup (unsplinted) impression techniques from the master model. Alarming rotational errors were recorded with the repositioning and the pickup (unsplinted) techniques. However, connecting the impression coping to the impression tray improves the accuracy of the pickup impression technique.
Subject(s)
Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Dental Implants, Single-Tooth , Dental Impression Technique , Models, Dental , Analysis of Variance , Dental Impression Materials , Dental Impression Technique/instrumentation , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Polyvinyls , Reproducibility of Results , Siloxanes , Statistics, NonparametricABSTRACT
This study investigated the accuracy of the repositioning impression technique at the implant level using vinyl polysiloxane impression material. Three groups each of ten senior dentists, postgraduate students and technicians were asked to use this technique to record the position of an implant in a master model. The Reflex Microscope was used to measure variations between the resulting casts and the master model. Significant difference between the casts and the master model in the X and Y-axes (p < 0.01) was recorded. Alarming inclinational and rotational errors for the implant analogue position were measured with all groups of operators. Similar distortion in the Z-axis was recorded.
