Ovarian hormones promote recovery from sleep deprivation by increasing sleep intensity in middle-aged ovariectomized rats.

Sleep disturbances are commonly associated with menopause. Hormone replacement therapy is often used to treat various menopausal symptoms, but its efficacy for improving sleep is a matter of debate. We addressed this question by using a rodent model of ovarian hormone loss and replacement in midlife. Middle-aged female rats were ovariectomized and implanted with capsules containing estradiol with or without progesterone, or oil. After two weeks, sleep/wake states were recorded polygraphically during a 24-h baseline period, followed by 6h of sleep deprivation in the second half of the light phase, and a 24-h recovery period. During the baseline dark phase, hormone treatments increased wakefulness, and decreased non-rapid eye movement sleep (NREMS) by shortening NREMS episodes; however, NREMS EEG delta power or energy (cumulative power) was unaffected by combined hormones. Following sleep deprivation, all the groups showed NREMS and rapid eye movement sleep (REMS) rebounds, with similar relative increases from respective baseline levels. The increases in NREMS EEG delta power/energy during recovery were enhanced by combined hormones. These results from middle-aged ovariectomized rats indicate that replacement with estrogen with or without progesterone reduces baseline NREMS without affecting sleep intensity, particularly during the dark (active) phase, whereas following sleep deprivation the same hormone treatments do not affect the ability to increase NREMS or REMS, but treatment with both hormones, in particular, enhances the intensity of recovery sleep. These results support the usefulness of ovariectomized middle-aged rats as a model system to study the biological effects of hormone replacement on sleep regulation.

Warfarin in systemic sclerosis-associated and idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. A Bayesian approach to evaluating treatment for uncommon disease.

OBJECTIVE: Warfarin is recommended in systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (SSc-PAH) and idiopathic PAH (IPAH) to improve survival. There is no evidence to support this in SSc-PAH and the evidence in IPAH is conflicting. We evaluated the ability of warfarin to improve survival using 2 large SSc-PAH and IPAH cohorts. METHODS: The effect of warfarin on all-cause mortality was evaluated. Bayesian propensity scores (PS) were used to adjust for baseline differences between patients exposed and not exposed to warfarin, and to assemble a matched cohort. Bayesian Cox proportional hazards models were constructed using informative priors based on international PAH expert elicitation. RESULTS: Review of 1138 charts identified 275 patients with SSc-PAH (n = 78; 28% treated with warfarin) and 155 patients with IPAH (n = 91; 59% treated with warfarin). Baseline differences in PAH severity and medications were resolved using PS matching. In the matched cohort of 98 patients with SSc-PAH (49 treated with warfarin), the posterior median hazard ratio (HR) was 1.06 [95% credible interval (CrI) 0.70, 1.63]. In the matched cohort of 66 patients with IPAH (33 treated with warfarin), the posterior median HR was 1.07 (95% CrI 0.57, 1.98). The probability that warfarin improves median survival by 6 months or more is 23.5% in SSc-PAH and 27.7% in IPAH. Conversely, there is a > 70% probability that warfarin provides no significant benefit or is harmful. CONCLUSION: There is a low probability that warfarin improves survival in SSc-PAH and IPAH. Given the availability of other PAH therapies with demonstrable benefits, there is little reason to use warfarin to improve survival for these patients.