Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Public Health Nutr ; 22(8): 1461-1470, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30793680

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to examine the key influences on infant and child feeding practices among a Marshallese community at each social ecological level. It is the first study to examine the key influences on infant and child feeding practices with Marshallese immigrant women in the USA and helps fill a gap in the previous literature that has included other immigrant women. DESIGN: Community-based participatory research design with twenty-seven participants taking part in four qualitative focus groups. SETTING: The study took place within the Marshallese community in Arkansas, USA.ParticipantsParticipants included Marshallese women with children aged 1-3 years and/or caregivers. Caregivers were defined as someone other than the parent who cares for children. Caregivers were often older women in the Marshallese community. RESULTS: There were five primary themes within multiple levels of the Social Ecological Model. At the intrapersonal level, mothers' and caregivers' autonomy emerged. At the interpersonal level, child-led and familial influences emerged. At the organizational level, health-care provider influences emerged; and at the policy level, the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children emerged as the most salient influence. CONCLUSIONS: Marshallese immigrant women's infant and child feeding practices are influenced at intrapersonal, interpersonal, organizational and policy levels. Understanding these multidimensional influences is necessary to inform the creation of culturally tailored interventions to reduce health disparities within the Marshallese community.


Subject(s)
Emigrants and Immigrants/psychology , Feeding Behavior/ethnology , Feeding Behavior/psychology , Mothers/psychology , Socioeconomic Factors , Adult , Arkansas , Caregivers/psychology , Child, Preschool , Community-Based Participatory Research , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Infant , Male , Micronesia/ethnology , Middle Aged , Qualitative Research
2.
Ment Health Clin ; 9(1): 36-40, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30627502

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The lifetime risk of developing depression is 16.6%, however the risk is 2-fold in patients with diabetes. The rate of diabetes is much higher for the Marshallese than the general US population, with a prevalence ranging from 25% to 50%, however the prevalence of depression is not well defined among this minority group. The primary objective of this study was to obtain the rate of positive depression screenings, using the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2), among adult Marshallese patients with diabetes. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for Marshallese adults receiving care in a student-led clinic in Northwest Arkansas. Marshallese adults with a documented PHQ-2 score and a diagnosis of type 1 or 2 diabetes, as outlined by the American Diabetes Association, were included. Demographic information was obtained from the medical records. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: The study included 96 patients. Ten patients scored a 3 or higher on the PHQ-2, indicating a positive screen. Of these, scores ranged from 3 to 6, with the majority of patients scoring 4 (N = 6). The average hemoglobin A1C for patients with a positive PHQ-2 score was 10.5%. DISCUSSION: This project identified a rate of 10.4% of patients with a positive PHQ-2 from the study sample. This finding is similar to the prevalence of depression for the general US population, however it is lower than rates cited in the literature for patients diagnosed with diabetes. Future studies should use Native Marshallese community health workers and focus groups to develop a multistep approach to obtain a culturally appropriate, translated tool with high sensitivity for patient response.

3.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 57(6): 704-710, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28807661

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To identify which states currently have substance use disorder (SUD) programs to facilitate the return of pharmacy professionals (including technicians, interns, and student pharmacists) to active practice, to identify the operational structures used by the states in providing these services and compare them with those reported previously, and to compile the most current and accurate contact information for each state SUD program. METHODS: Information specific to each state program was identified from Internet resources including state pharmacy associations, licensing boards, and professional associations. Each state's site was evaluated for currency within 2016-2017. Direct contact by e-mail or telephone using the program information, or association, or licensing board contacts was pursued to identify the current program status. RESULTS: Five states with no program in 1990 have since developed programs, and 2 states with programs in 1990 have closed their programs. Overall, 4 states do not currently have a program, 2 of which have never had one. One of the 2 states has recent authorization from their legislature to develop a program. Three other programs are currently in transition from 1 model to another, resulting in website inaccuracies. The operational models have undergone significant shifts with a decrease in the association (± [with or without] Foundation) model toward a group health care association or organization model including other health- or all state-licensed professionals. CONCLUSION: Currently, 46 states have programs for assisting pharmacy professionals. Information presented in this article provides the most current contact information and model structure used by states with programs. Frequent updating of program information is critical for those who might decide to seek assistance. Expansion to include a central database that enables rigorous evaluation of outcomes and specific features is viewed as desirable.


Subject(s)
Pharmacists , Pharmacy Technicians , Professional Impairment , State Health Plans , Students, Pharmacy , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , Government Regulation , Humans , Pharmacists/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmacy Technicians/legislation & jurisprudence , Policy Making , Professional Impairment/legislation & jurisprudence , Program Development , State Government , State Health Plans/legislation & jurisprudence , Students, Pharmacy/legislation & jurisprudence , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...