Nonsuicidal Self-Injury and Borderline Personality Features as Risk Factors for Suicidal Ideation Among Male Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.

U.S. veterans are at increased risk for suicide compared to their civilian counterparts and account for approximately 20% of all deaths by suicide. Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and borderline personality features (BPF) have each been associated with increased suicide risk. Additionally, emerging research suggests that nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) may be a unique risk factor for suicidal behavior. Archival data from 728 male veterans with a PTSD diagnosis who were receiving care through an outpatient Veterans Health Administration (VHA) specialty PTSD clinic were analyzed. Diagnosis of PTSD was based on a structured clinical interview administered by trained clinicians. A subscale of the Personality Assessment Inventory was used to assess BPF, and NSSI and suicidal ideation (SI) were assessed by self-report. Findings revealed that NSSI (58.8%) and BPF (23.5%) were both relatively common in this sample of male veterans with PTSD. As expected, each condition was associated with significantly increased odds of experiencing SI compared to PTSD alone, odds ratios (ORs) = 1.2-2.6. Moreover, co-occurring PTSD, NSSI, and BPF were associated with significantly increased odds of experiencing SI compared with PTSD, OR = 5.68; comorbid PTSD and NSSI, OR = 2.57; and comorbid PTSD and BPF, OR = 2.13. The present findings provide new insight into the rates of NSSI and BPF among male veterans with PTSD and highlight the potential importance of these factors in suicide risk.

Spanish Abstracts by Asociación Chilena de Estrés Traumático (ACET) Autoagresiones no suicidas y características del Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe como Factores de Riesgo para Ideación Suicida entre Veteranos varones con Trastorno de Estrés Postraumático ALNS, TPL E IS ENTRE VETERANOS VARONES CON TEPT Los veteranos estadounidenses tienen un riesgo de suicidio mayor que su contraparte civil, dando cuenta de aproximadamente el 20% de las muertes por suicidio. El Trastorno de Estrés Postraumático (TEPT) y los síntomas del Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe (TPL) han sido asociados individualmente con un aumento del riesgo suicida. Adicionalmente, la investigación emergente sugiere que las autolesiones no suicidas (ALNS) pueden ser un factor de riesgo único para la conducta suicida. Se analizaron datos de archivo de 728 veteranos varones con diagnóstico de TEPT que estaban recibiendo atención a través de una clínica ambulatoria especializada en TEPT de la Administración de Salud de Veteranos (VHA, por sus siglas en inglés). El diagnóstico de TEPT se basó en una entrevista clínica estructurada administrada por clínicos entrenados. Se usó una subescala del Inventario de Evaluación de la Personalidad para evaluar TPL, y las ALNS e Ideación Suicida (IS) fueron evaluadas por auto-reporte. Los hallazgos revelaron que las ALNS (58.8%) y las características de TPL (23.5%) fueron ambas relativamente comunes en esta muestra de varones veteranos con TEPT. Como era esperado, cada condición se asoció con una probabilidad significativamente aumentada de experimentar IS comparado al TEPT solo, odds ratio (ORs) = 1.2-2.6. Más aún, la co-ocurrencia de TEPT, ALNS y TPL se asoció a una probabilidad significativamente mayor de experimentar IS comparado con TEPT, OR = 5.68; TEPT y ALNS comórbidos, OR=2.57; y TEPT comórbido con TPL, OR=2.13. Los presentes hallazgos proveen una nueva visión en las tasas de ALNS y características de TPL entre los varones veteranos con TEPT y destacan la potencial importancia de estos factores en el riesgo de suicidio.

Alcohol use in an academic medical school environment: A UC San Diego Healer Education Assessment and Referral (HEAR) Report.

BACKGROUND: Medical students and physicians in training and in practice are at risk for excessive alcohol use and abuse, potentially impacting the affected individuals as well as their family members, trainees, and patients. However, several roadblocks to care, including stigma, often keep them from seeking treatment. METHODS: We analyzed data from anonymous questionnaires completed by medical students, house staff, and faculty from 2009 to 2014 as part of a depression awareness and suicide prevention program at a state-supported medical school in the United States. The authors explored associations between self-reported "drinking too much" and depression, suicidal ideation, substance use, intense affective states, and mental health treatment. RESULTS: Approximately one-fifth of the respondents reported "drinking too much." "Drinking too much" was associated with more severe depression and impairment, past suicide attempts and current suicidal ideation, intense affective states, and other substance use. Those who were "drinking too much" were more likely than others to accept referrals for mental health treatment through the anonymous interactive screening program, suggesting that this program may be effective in skirting the stigma barrier for accessing mental health care for this at-risk population. CONCLUSIONS: The self-reported prevalence of "drinking too much" among medical students, house staff, and faculty is high and associated with negative mental health outcomes. Targeted, anonymous screenings may identify at-risk individuals and provide mental health care referrals to those in need.

Bereavement: course, consequences, and care.

This paper discusses each of several potential consequences of bereavement. First, we describe ordinary grief, followed by a discussion of grief gone awry, or complicated grief (CG). Then, we cover other potential adverse outcomes of bereavement, each of which may contribute to, but are not identical with, CG: general medical comorbidity, mood disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and substance use.

The removal of the bereavement exclusion in the DSM-5: exploring the evidence.

Since 1980, the DSM-III and its various iterations through the DSM-IV-TR have systematically excluded individuals from the diagnosis of major depressive disorder if symptoms began within months after the death of a loved one (2 months in DSM-IV), unless the depressive syndrome was 'severely' impairing and/or accompanied by specific features. This criterion became known as the 'bereavement exclusion'. No other adverse life events were noted to negate the diagnosis of major depressive disorder if all other symptomatic, duration, severity and distress/impairment criteria were met. However, studies since the inception of the bereavement exclusion have shown that depressive syndromes occurring after bereavement share many of the same features as other, non-bereavement related depressions, tend to be chronic and/or recurrent if left untreated, interfere with the resolution of grief, and respond to treatment. Furthermore, the bereavement exclusion has had the unintended consequence of suggesting that grief should end in only 2 months, or that grief and major depressive disorder cannot co-occur. To prevent the denial of diagnosis and the consideration of sometimes much needed care, even after bereavement or other significant losses, the DSM-5 no longer contains the bereavement exclusion. Instead, the DSM-5 now permits the diagnosis of major depressive disorder after and during bereavement and includes a note and a comprehensive footnote in the major depressive episode criteria set to guide clinicians in making the diagnosis in this context. The decision to make this change was widely and publically debated and remains controversial. This article reports on the rationale for this decision and the way the DSM-5 now addresses the challenges of diagnosing major depressive disorder in the context of someone grieving the loss of a loved one.

Suicide bereavement and complicated grief.

Losing a loved to suicide is one is one of life's most painful experiences. The feelings of loss, sadness, and loneliness experienced after any death of a loved one are often magnified in suicide survivors by feelings of quilt, confusion, rejection, shame, anger, and the effects of stigma and trauma. Furthermore, survivors of suicide loss are at higher risk of developing major depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and suicidal behaviors, as well as a prolonged form of grief called complicated grief. Added to the burden is the substantial stigma, which can keep survivors away from much needed support and healing resources. Thus, survivors may require unique supportive measures and targeted treatment to cope with their loss. After a brief description of the epidemiology and circumstances of suicide, we review the current state of research on suicide bereavement, complicated grief in suicide survivors, and grief treatment for survivors of suicide.

The bereavement exclusion and DSM-5.

BACKGROUND: Pre-DSM-III (where DSM is Diagnostic and Statistical Manual), a series of studies demonstrated that major depressive syndromes were common after bereavement and that these syndromes often were transient, not requiring treatment. Largely on the basis of these studies, a decision was made to exclude the diagnosis of a major depressive episode (MDE) if symptoms could be "better accounted for by bereavement than by MDE" unless symptoms were severe and very impairing. Thus, since the publication of DSM-III in 1980, the official position of American Psychiatry has been that recent bereavement may be an exclusion criterion for the diagnosis of an MDE. This review article attempts to answer the question, "Does the best available research favor continuing the 'bereavement exclusion' (BE) in DSM-5?" We have previously discussed the proposal by the DSM-5 Mood Disorders Work Group to remove the BE from DSM-5. METHODS: Prior reviews have evaluated the validity of the BE based on studies published through 2006. The current review adds research studies published since 2006 and critically examines arguments for and against retaining the BE in DSM-5. RESULTS: The preponderance of data suggests that bereavement-related depression is not different from MDE that presents in any other context; it is equally genetically influenced, most likely to occur in individuals with past personal and family histories of MDE, has similar personality characteristics and patterns of comorbidity, is as likely to be chronic and/or recurrent, and responds to antidepressant medications. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the BE should not be retained in DSM-5.