Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
Add more filters











Publication year range
1.
J Pharm Pract ; 35(4): 664-668, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33736530

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to examine student perceptions of accomplishment among 6 subdomains of Center for Advancement of Pharmacy Education (CAPE) Domain 3 "Approach to Practice and Care" outcomes in Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences (APPE) across distinct geographical regions. METHODS: An 18-item electronic survey was distributed to 88 student pharmacists at a private university completing APPEs in 5 distinct regions and 2 concentrated learning experiences during their penultimate rotation. The survey assessed whether students had at least 1 opportunity to achieve Domain 3 outcomes. Students were prompted to report a percentage of perceived successful accomplishment of outcomes if they stated they had at least 1 opportunity for achievement. RESULTS: Survey response rate was 52% (n = 46). Respondents reported a median accomplishment of at least 85% for each question. For 2 questions, respondents reported a median accomplishment of 99%. Students perceived successful accomplishment for most of the questions related to communication outcomes, while the lowest completion percentages were noted in outcomes related to patient advocacy (85%) and problem solving (88%). Student perceptions of accomplishment among the 6 subdomains were similar across regions and concentrated learning experiences. CONCLUSIONS: Students felt confident in accomplishing the outcomes associated with CAPE Domain 3. Regional assignments did not impact student perceptions of outcome accomplishment. Preceptors may play a pivotal role in providing students with opportunities to further polish their skills and increase confidence, specifically in the areas of patient advocacy and problem solving.


Subject(s)
Education, Pharmacy , Pharmaceutical Services , Pharmacies , Pharmacy , Students, Pharmacy , Curriculum , Humans
2.
Ment Health Clin ; 11(4): 231-237, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34316418

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Medications used to treat OUD have common metabolic pathways and pharmacodynamic properties that can lead to drug-drug interactions (DDIs) that may go unnoticed in the inpatient setting. The purpose of this study was to identify the frequency of DDIs between medications prescribed for OUD and commonly used inpatient medications. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of orders for buprenorphine, buprenorphine-naloxone, and methadone to identify potential DDIs. Adult inpatients with an order for one of these medications for OUD were included. Medication regimens were evaluated throughout the inpatient stay and on day of discharge for DDIs. DDIs were classified by severity and type of interaction (increased risk of QT prolongation, additive CNS effects/respiratory depression, and opioid withdrawal). The primary endpoint was the number of potential DDIs. Other endpoints included number of each classification/severity of DDI, duration of therapy of interacting medications, and modifications made to OUD medications because of DDIs. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were included, with 215 inpatient interactions and 83 interactions at discharge identified. While inpatient, 85% of patients were on an interacting medication, and 46% of patients were on an interacting medication at discharge. The most common classification of DDI was additive CNS effects/respiratory depression (68.8% inpatient, 50.6% discharge), followed by QT prolongation (24.2% inpatient, 45.8% discharge). The majority of DDIs were classified as requiring close monitoring rather than contraindicated. DISCUSSION: There are opportunities to optimize the prescribing practices surrounding OUD medications in both the inpatient setting and at discharge to ensure patient safety.

3.
Innov Pharm ; 12(1)2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34007680

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While many public pharmacy schools have an adjoining health-system to accommodate their students, some pharmacy programs form partnerships with non-affiliated health-systems to precept students. These health-systems often afford students the opportunity to complete multiple rotations within a single organization, offering decreased onboarding time and more longitudinal experiences. INNOVATION: Two autonomous partnerships were developed with independent healthcare systems for concentrated learning experiences during the advanced pharmacy practice experiences year. Each program differs in student requirements and is overseen by the practice site, with participation by area faculty. KEY FINDINGS: A survey assessed professional skill set development, achievement of program goals during the experiential year, and student satisfaction of a concentrated learning experience. A comparison between programs was completed to assess for consistency in student experiences. Nineteen students (83%) responded to the survey. Students from both health-systems reported similarities in professional skill growth. Likewise, all students reported achievement of program goals and overall satisfaction with their experiential training. CONCLUSIONS: Independently managed concentrated learning experiences provided evidence of consistent growth in student professional development and achievement of programmatic goals. Partnerships with non-affiliated healthcare systems can provide a rich training ground for student learners.

4.
Ann Pharmacother ; 54(11): 1144-1158, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32443941

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To review literature on the use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with high body weight (BW) and/or high body mass index (BMI) and to make recommendations regarding use in this patient population. DATA SOURCES: A search using PubMed was conducted (inception to April 13, 2020) using the term DOAC AND the terms obesity OR body weight. A separate search was also conducted with individual DOACs (dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban) and the aforementioned terms. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Studies included examined the effect of BW and/or BMI on DOAC pharmacokinetics, efficacy, or safety. Included studies had DOAC indications of prevention of stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, or treatment or long-term prevention of venous thromboembolism. DATA SYNTHESIS: The efficacy and safety of DOACs in patients with high BW/BMI has not yet been elucidated by randomized trials; however, 2016 international guidelines suggest avoiding their use in patients with a BW >120 kg or BMI >40 kg/m2. Since 2016, several studies have been published examining use of DOACs in this patient population. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: This review thoroughly discusses the literature on DOACs in patients with a BW >120 kg or BMI >40 kg/m2 pre-2016 and post-2016 guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence indicates that each DOAC may have differences in outcomes when used in patients with a high BW/BMI. Currently, low-quality data are available that support avoiding dabigatran and considering apixaban or rivaroxaban; lack of sufficient data preclude a recommendation for edoxaban use in this patient population.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Obesity/drug therapy , Administration, Oral , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/pharmacokinetics , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/complications , Humans , Middle Aged , Obesity/blood , Obesity/complications , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Stroke/prevention & control , Venous Thromboembolism/complications , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control
5.
Ther Adv Infect Dis ; 6: 2049936119863013, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31452884

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Data on the effectiveness of definitive oral (PO) antibiotics for BSIs in preparation for discharge from hospital are lacking, particularly for Gram-positive bacterial BSIs (GP-BSI). The objective of this study was to determine rates of treatment failure based on bioavailability of PO antimicrobial agents used for GP-BSI. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of adult inpatients admitted to an academic medical center over a three-year period. Patients with a non-staphylococcal GP-BSI who received intravenous antibiotics and were then switched to PO antibiotics for at least a third of their treatment course were included. The cohort was stratified into high (⩾90%) and low (<90%) bioavailability groups. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients experiencing clinical failure in each group. Secondary endpoints included clinical failure stratified by antibiotic group, bactericidal versus bacteriostatic PO agents, and organism. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients met criteria for inclusion, which failed to reach the a priori power calculation. Of the patients included, 26 received high bioavailability agents and 77 received low bioavailability agents. Infections originated largely from a pulmonary source (30%) and were caused primarily by streptococcal species (75%). Treatment failure rates were 19.2% in the high bioavailability group and 23.4% in the low bioavailability group (p = 0.66). Clinical failure stratified by subgroups also did not yield statistically significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical failure rates were similar among patients definitively treated with high or low bioavailability agents for GP-BSI, though the study was underpowered to detect such a difference.

6.
Ann Pharmacother ; 53(1): 82-94, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30073873

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To review the pharmacokinetics, safety, common drug-drug interactions (DDIs), and advantages and disadvantages of new single-tablet regimens (STRs) approved since September 2016 for HIV-1 infection. DATA SOURCES: A search using PubMed was conducted (2004 through May 2018) using the following keywords: single tablet regimen AND HIV. Additionally, a PubMed search was conducted for each individual STR using the generic names of the agents. For specific STRs, additional search terms were added to narrow results. Articles were evaluated for content, and additional references were identified from a review of literature citations. Conference abstracts from national and international HIV conferences were also searched. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Studies included were published randomized controlled trials and observational studies that evaluated STR approved since September 2016. Relevant conference abstracts were included if the study design was a randomized controlled trial or observational study pertaining to the STRs included. DATA SYNTHESIS: Four new STRs are available, including the first dual antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimen for virologically suppressed patients. Of the STRs, only 1 is a new molecular entity, and others include new combinations of existing agents that result in distinct advantages and disadvantages. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: The treatment of HIV-1 continues to improve with new agents developed rapidly. These agents should be analyzed in regard to efficacy, safety, DDIs, and appropriateness for specific patients on an individual basis. CONCLUSIONS: STRs and agents in the pipeline continue to simplify ART regimens, increase medication adherence, and minimize toxicities.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Tablets/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Medication Adherence
8.
Ann Pharmacother ; 51(4): 332-344, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27895236

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To review the pharmacokinetics, safety, drug-drug interactions, and advantages and disadvantages of currently available single-tablet regimens (STRs) for HIV-1 infection. DATA SOURCES: A search using PubMed was conducted (up to September 2016) using the following keywords: single tablet regimen AND HIV. Additionally, a PubMed search was conducted for each individual STR using the generic names of the agents. Articles were evaluated for content, and additional references were identified from a review of literature citations. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Studies included were predominantly phase III clinical trials with the exception of tenofovir alafenamide because phase I and phase II trials were also relevant for this new antiretroviral agent. DATA SYNTHESIS: Six STRs are currently available for the treatment of HIV-1. Each agent has unique pharmacokinetic, safety, and drug-drug interaction profiles that result in distinct advantages and disadvantages. Three of these agents are first-line recommended therapies per national guidelines because of high virological efficacy and tolerability. CONCLUSIONS: STRs have significantly advanced HIV management by minimizing pill burden and improving patient compliance. It is important to consider the nuances of each STR in regard to renal and hepatic function, drug interactions, and tolerability, to ensure safe and effective use.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV-1/drug effects , Anti-HIV Agents/adverse effects , Anti-HIV Agents/pharmacokinetics , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Combinations , Drug Interactions , Humans , Tablets
9.
Prog Transplant ; 26(3): 270-6, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27297232

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: There is evidence that depression after liver transplant (LTX) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality; however, the effect of depression treatment on LTX outcomes has not been well established. OBJECTIVE/SETTING/DESIGN: This single-center, longitudinal cohort study aimed to determine whether depression treatment influences outcomes after LTX. Depression diagnosis was based on medical history and documentation from psychosocial providers. PATIENTS/INTERVENTION/MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were studied from October 2010 to June 2013 and separated into 3 groups for analysis: no depression, adequately treated depression, and inadequately treated depression. Adequacy of depression treatment was determined using the Antidepressant Treatment History Form. RESULTS: Of the 161 patients included in the analysis, 103 did not have depression, 24 had adequately treated depression, and 34 had inadequately treated depression. Baseline demographics were similar between the groups. Patients with inadequately treated depression had significantly more encounters with a health-care provider (P = .03). Graft loss tended to be higher in these patients (27% in the inadequately treated group, 17% in the adequately treated, and 14% in the no depression group, P = .25). The adequately treated group was more likely than the inadequately treated group to be on antidepressants at 30 days post-LTX (P = .001). The inadequately treated group was more likely to be on a sleep aid 30 days post-LTX (P = .01). CONCLUSION: Inadequately treated depression led to increased health-care resource utilization. Patients with adequately treated depression had similar outcomes as those with no depression. Use of sleep aids early post-LTX may be a surrogate indicator of inadequately treated depression.


Subject(s)
Depression/etiology , Liver Transplantation/psychology , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Depression/therapy , Depressive Disorder , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Treatment Outcome
10.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 73(5 Suppl 1): S14-21, 2016 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26896521

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Results of a study of the relationship among voriconazole dosages, serum concentrations, adverse effects, and clinical outcomes are presented. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted that included all patients who had at least one voriconazole concentration drawn between July 1, 2009, and August 15, 2014, at a single academic medical center. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with initial voriconazole concentrations in the target range. RESULTS: Forty-seven of 88 patients (53%) had an initial voriconazole concentration within the target range, 27% (24 of 88) of patients had a concentration above the range, and 19% (17 of 88) had a concentration below the range. Sixty-seven percent of patients with above-target concentrations had adverse effects. Voriconazole was discontinued in 9% of patients, and dosages were reduced in 11% of patients because of adverse effects. Voriconazole for treatment versus prophylaxis was analyzed in a subgroup, as was obesity and nonobesity. Twenty-four percent of patients died during their hospital admission, and 14% were not discharged on voriconazole therapy. The within-target group had the highest proportion of patients discharged on voriconazole and the lowest proportion of deaths. CONCLUSION: A retrospective study in one institution revealed that the first measured voriconazole concentration was within the target range in 53% of patients and that dosage was modified in only 51% of patients whose concentration was outside of that range. The majority of patients with above-target concentrations had an adverse effect, and this result was particularly common in patients with a body mass index of ≥35 kg/m(2).


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers/methods , Antifungal Agents/blood , Drug Monitoring/methods , Voriconazole/blood , Adult , Aged , Antifungal Agents/adverse effects , Brain Diseases/blood , Brain Diseases/chemically induced , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/blood , Retrospective Studies , Voriconazole/adverse effects
12.
Ann Pharmacother ; 47(9): 1201-5, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24259736

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the evidence for the use of fluoxetine in treatment of underweight and weight-restored patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) and provide recommendations for the clinical usefulness of fluoxetine in AN. DATA SOURCES: Literature was accessed via PubMed through June 2013 using the terms fluoxetine and anorexia nervosa. In addition, reference citations from publications identified were reviewed. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Randomized controlled trials published in English identified from the data sources were evaluated. Studies including the use of fluoxetine in underweight or weight-restored patients with AN were included. Studies of fluoxetine in preclinical animal models of anorexia nervosa were excluded. DATA SYNTHESIS: AN is a serious psychiatric illness with no currently approved medication therapy. Because patients with AN frequently display symptoms of major depressive and obsessive-compulsive disorders, medication therapy is commonly used in attempts to improve these symptoms and prevent relapses of AN. Antidepressants such as fluoxetine are the most frequently used medications for these symptoms. The evidence for fluoxetine in the treatment of AN is controversial, particularly in patients who remain underweight. One theory of inefficacy is that underweight patients do not have the nutrients required to make serotonin, therefore preventing selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors from taking effect. Another theory involves dysregulation of the serotonin receptor. Despite the lack of evidence, fluoxetine may still be useful in certain underweight and weight-restored patients. CONCLUSIONS: The risk-benefit ratio of fluoxetine in underweight and weight-restored patients with AN is undefined by clinical trials; therefore, clinical experience must be applied for its use in this patient population.


Subject(s)
Anorexia Nervosa/drug therapy , Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation/therapeutic use , Fluoxetine/therapeutic use , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Body Weight/drug effects , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL