Para avanzar en el conocimiento de la seguridad del paciente: a propósito de la biblioteca breve de seguridad del paciente / To promote knowledge on patient safety: the case of the Biblioteca Breve de Seguridad del Paciente(Brief Patient Safety Library)

FUNDAMENTOS: En el marco de la Estrategia de Seguridad del Paciente 2015-2020 la Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad de Madrid desarrolló dos líneas de actuación para consolidar la cultura de seguridad a través de la difusión del conocimiento científico en Seguridad del Paciente. El objetivo principal fue identificar, difundir y mejorar el acceso a la información relevante en seguridad del paciente a pacientes-ciudadanos, profesionales y a la propia organización mediante un catálogo de recursos accesible en internet e intranet. MÉTODOS: Tras un análisis de las herramientas y canales de comunicación disponibles para difundir el conocimiento en seguridad del paciente, se seleccionaron las referencias de interés por un grupo de expertos, se desarrolló una herramienta de consulta en un formato navegable en internet y se realizaron distintas acciones de difusión para darla a conocer. RESULTADOS: Se desarrolló la Biblioteca Breve de Seguridad del Paciente, accesible en la web de la Comunidad de Madrid para navegación y como documento para descargar, con 154 referencias, estructuradas en 4 áreas: Recursos generales (74 referencias), Recursos por Área temática (51 referencias), Videos y multimedia (12 referencias) y Organismos y sitios web de interés (17 referencias). CONCLUSIONES: La Biblioteca Breve de Seguridad del Paciente puede contribuir a impulsar la cultura de seguridad en los centros sanitarios y a lograr mayor implicación de los ciudadanos en su seguridad, al poner a su disposición información fiable sobre esta dimensión transversal de la práctica clínica

BACKGROUND: Within the framework of the Patient Safety Strategy 2015-2020, the Regional Ministry of Health of the Community of Madrid developed two lines of action to consolidate the Patient Safety Culture through the dissemination of scientific knowledge in Patient Safety. The main objective was to identify, disseminate and improve access to relevant information on patient safety for patient-citizens, professionals and the organization itself through a pool of resources accessible on the Internet and intranet. METHODS: After an analysis of the tools and communication channel savailable to disseminate knowledge in patient safety, the references of interest were selected by a group of experts, a consultation tool was developed in a navigable format on the internet and various dissemination actions were carried out to make it known. RESULTS: The Biblioteca Breve de Seguridad del Paciente( Brief Patient Safety Library) was developed, accessible for navigation on the web of the Community of Madrid and as a download document, with 154 references, structured in 4areas: General resources (74 references), Resources by thematic area (51references), Videosand multimedia (12references) and Organizations and websites of interest (17references). CONCLUSIONS: The Biblioteca Brevede Seguridad del Paciente (Brief Patient Safety Library) can help to promote the safety culture in health centers and to achieve greater citizen involvement in their safety, by providing reliable information on this crosscutting dimension of clinical practice

The use of unsafe abbreviations in discharge report and medical prescription: Observational and retrospective study / El uso de abreviaturas no recomendadas en el informe de alta y prescripción médica: Estudio observacional retrospectivo.

Background. The medical record represents the transcript of the pathologic narrative of a patient. Our aims were: to identify the most common abbreviations present in medical records; to identify discouraged abbreviations; to identify polysemic abbreviations; and to show the distribution of the abbreviations according to the type of ward (medical-surgical). Methods. An observational, descriptive and retrospective study by auditing the digital clinical records of patients discharged from FuenlabradaUniversityHospital in 2013 was conducted. Abbreviations in discharge reports and medical order prescriptions present in 78 medical records, corresponding to 39 men and 39 women of different services, were reviewed. Results. All medical records showed abbreviations. The mean of abbreviations in each medical record was 38.9±17.7. Medical records showed 688 different abbreviations, which were repeated up to a total of 3,038 times. The most frequent abbreviations were HTA (n=98; 3.23%), AP (n=89; 2.93%). Twenty-eight abbreviations considered unsafe appeared and were repeated 646 times. The most frequent included SC (n=63; 9.75%), ui (n=49; 7.59%), > (n=38; 5.88%), mcg (n=36; 5.57%). Twenty-three polysemic abbreviations were also identified, the most frequent being H (n=117; 12.81%), MC (n= 109; 11.94%), MP (n=99; 10.84%). Finally, medical wards had 1,866 abbreviations and surgical 1,172 (P <0.001). Conclusions. All medical records revised included unsafe abbreviations. The use of unsafe abbreviations was common among medical services.

El uso de abreviaturas no recomendadas en el informe de alta y prescripción médica: estudio observacional retrospectivo / The use of unsafe abbreviations in discharge report and medical prescription: observational and retrospective study

Fundamento: La historia clínica es la transcripción del relato patográfico del paciente. Los objetivos de este trabajo fueron: identificar las abreviaturas más frecuentes presentes en la historia clínica, identificar las abreviaturas desaconsejadas, identificar abreviaturas polisémicas, y describir su distribución según servicio (médico-quirúrgico). Material y métodos: Estudio observacional, descriptivo y retrospectivo mediante auditoría de historia clínica digitalizada de pacientes dados de alta del hospital Universitario Fuenlabrada en el año 2013. Se revisaron las abreviaturas de los informes de alta y las órdenes de prescripción en 78 historias clínicas (39 hombres y 39 mujeres) de diferentes servicios. Resultados: El 100% de las historias revisadas presentaron abreviaturas (media: 38,95; DS 17,7). Se encontraron 688 abreviaturas diferentes, que se repetían hasta llegar a un total de 3.038. Las más frecuentes fueron: HTA (n=98; 3,23%), AP (n=89; 2,93%), SC (n=63; 2,07%). Se identificaron 28 abreviaturas desaconsejadas, repitiéndose 646 veces. Las más frecuentes fueron: SC (n=63; 9,75%), ui (n=49; 7,59%), > (n=38; 5,88%), mcg (n=36; 5,57%). Se identificaron 23 abreviaturas polisémicas, siendo las más frecuentes: H (n=117; 12,81%), MC (n= 109; 11,94%), MP (n=99; 10,84%). Finalmente, los servicios médicos presentaron 1.866 abreviaturas y los quirúrgicos 1.172 (p<0,001). Conclusiones: Todas las historias clínicas presentaron abreviaturas de riesgo, y el uso de abreviaturas desaconsejadas fue habitual en los servicios de medicina (AU)

Background: The medical record represents the transcript of the pathologic narrative of a patient. Our aims were: to identify the most common abbreviations present in medical records; to identify discouraged abbreviations; to identify polysemic abbreviations; and to show the distribution of the abbreviations according to the type of ward (medical-surgical). Methods: An observational, descriptive and retrospective study by auditing the digital clinical records of patients discharged from Fuenlabrada University Hospital in 2013 was conducted. Abbreviations in discharge reports and medical order prescriptions present in 78 medical records, corresponding to 39 men and 39 women of different services, were reviewed. Results: All medical records showed abbreviations. The mean of abbreviations in each medical record was 38.9±17.7. Medical records showed 688 different abbreviations, which were repeated up to a total of 3,038 times. The most frequent abbreviations were HTA (n=98; 3.23%), AP (n=89; 2.93%). Twenty-eight abbreviations considered unsafe appeared and were repeated 646 times. The most frequent included SC (n=63; 9.75%), ui (n=49; 7.59%), > (n=38; 5.88%), mcg (n=36; 5.57%). Twenty-three polysemic abbreviations were also identified, the most frequent being H (n=117; 12.81%), MC (n= 109; 11.94%), MP (n=99; 10.84%). Finally, medical wards had 1,866 abbreviations and surgical 1,172 (P <0.001). Conclusions: All medical records revised included unsafe abbreviations. The use of unsafe abbreviations was common among medical services (AU)

Reduction in the incidence of pressure ulcers upon implementation of a reminder system for health-care providers.

PURPOSE: To measure the clinical impact of the introduction of a reminder system for healthcare professionals to alert patients who are at risk for pressure ulcers (PU). METHODS: This was a pre- and post-test study of patients who were discharged from 6 medical-surgical units of the University Hospital of Fuenlabrada in 2009 and 2010. Beginning in January 2010, implementation of an on-screen list of reminders was automatically updated daily on the units' computers including patient arrival date, last assessment of ulceration risk and location of any PU. The cumulative incidence of PU was measured for patients discharged in 2009 (group A: healthcare professionals were not exposed to on-screen reminder) and 2010 (group B: healthcare professionals were exposed to on-screen reminder list). The relative risk (RR) was estimated. The study was completed with a stratified analysis and binary logistic regression. RESULTS: In group A, there were 84 cases of PU among 9263 patients discharged (0.9%); whereas in group B, there were 59 cases among 9220 patients discharged (0.6%). The RR of PU for group B/group A was 0.706 (p=0.038). In the logistic regression analysis, after adjusting for study variables, the odds ratio of PU B/A was 0.558. CONCLUSION: A list of on-screen reminders at the beginning of a healthcare professional's shift to inform them of patients at risk for developing a PU was effective at reducing the incidence of these clinical burdens.

Analysis of allergy alerts registered in a hospital electronic health record system

No disponible

[Validity of clinical register of pressure ulcers]. / La validez de un registro clínico de úlceras por presión.

BACKGROUND: To compare pressure ulcers (PU) found in this prospective observational study with PU recorded in the Electronic Medical Record (EHR). METHOD: We use a prospective observational study to record PU, with daily monitoring by an observer in the medical-surgical units of hospitalization, as well as a clinical record review of PU tracking. Patient monitoring was conducted between December 2008 and March 2009 at Fuenlabrada University hospital. We calculated the absolute and relative frequency of PU in the patients followed, as well as the association among qualitative variables and the validity of the registration in the EHR with regard to the reference standard, the observational study. RESULTS: Among the 1,001 patients followed-up in this study, 42 of them showed PU (4.2% of the total patients), compared to 25 (2.5%) patients who had registered PU in the Electronic Health Record, which means a statistically significant difference (p<0.001). The record of PU presents a Kappa index of 0.548, with a sensitivity of 47.62 % and a specificity of 99.48 %, with regard to the reference standard, the observational study. CONCLUSION: The number of patients with pressure ulcers almost doubled if the observational data collection is done by an expert nurse compared to what was recorded in the EHR.

La validez de un registro clínico de úlceras por presión / Validity of clinical register of pressure ulcers

Objetivos: Comparar las úlceras por presión (UPP) encontradas en este estudio observacional prospectivo con las registradas en la historia clínica electrónica (HCE). Método: Estudio observacional prospectivo para registrarlas UPP, con seguimiento diario por una observadora en las unidades de hospitalización médico-quirúrgicas y revisión del registro clínico de seguimiento de UPP. El seguimiento de los pacientes se realizó entre diciembre de 2008 y marzo de 2009 en el hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada. Se ha calculado la frecuencia absoluta y relativa de UPP en los pacientes seguidos, la asociación entre variables cualitativas y la validez del registro en la HCE con respecto al patrón de referencia, el estudio observacional. Resultados: Se ha completado un seguimiento a 1.001 pacientes encontrando 42 pacientes con UPP frente a los 25 pacientes que tenían registrada UPP en la HCE, siendo estadísticamente significativa la diferencia (p<0,001). El registro de la UPP en la HCE presenta un índice Kappa de 0,584 con una sensibilidad de 47,62% y una especificidad de 99,48% con respecto a la observación directa. Conclusión: El número de pacientes que presentan UPP prácticamente se duplica si la recogida de datos es observacional por una enfermera experta frente a lo registrado en la HCE (AU)

Background: To compare pressure ulcers (PU) found in this prospective observational study with PU recorded in the Electronic Medical Record (EHR). Method: We use a prospective observational study to record PU, with daily monitoring by an observer in the medical-surgical units of hospitalization, as well as a clinical record review of PU tracking. Patient monitoring was conducted between December 2008 and March 2009 at Fuenlabrada University hospital. We calculated the absolute and relative frequency of PU in the patients followed, as well as the association among qualitative variables and the validity of the registration in the EHR with regard to the reference standard, the observational study. Results: Among the 1,001 patients followed-up in this study, 42 of them showed PU (4.2% of the total patients), compared to 25 (2.5%) patients who had registered PU in the Electronic Health Record, which means a statistically significant difference (p<0.001). The record of PU presents a Kappa index of 0.548, with a sensitivity of 47.62 % and a specificity of 99.48 %, with regard to the reference standard, the observational study. Conclusion: The number of patients with pressure ulcers almost doubled if the observational data collection is done by an expert nurse compared to what was recorded in the EHR (AU)

Impacto de la implantación de recordatorios para disminuir eventos adversos en pacientes con accesos venosos periféricos / Impact of implementation of reminders to reduce adverse effects in patients with peripheral venous catheterizations

Fundamento. Medir el impacto clínico de la implantación de un sistema de recordatorios, que avise de los pacientes que tienen riesgo de presentar un evento adverso (EA) relacionado con los catéteres venosos periféricos. Métodos. A partir de los registros que se utilizan para seguimiento de los catéteres intravenosos se desarrolló una consulta automatizada que elabora un listado de los pacientes ingresados que incluye fecha de ingreso, fecha colocación, vía y tipo de vía. Se actualiza por turno en los ordenadores de la unidad. Se implantó en enero de 2010. Se ha realizado un estudio cuasi experimental midiendo la incidencia acumulada de flebitis, extravasaciones y obstrucciones en los pacientes dados de alta en 2009 y en 2010. Se ha evaluado la asociación entre variables cualitativas con el test de Chicuadrado, se ha estimado riesgo relativo (RR) y el número necesario de pacientes a tratar (NNT). Resultados. En el año 2009 fueron dados de alta en las unidades de estudio 9.263 pacientes y en 2010, 9.220 pacientes. Los resultados encontrados han sido: Pacientes que desarrollan flebitis 2010/2009: RR: 0,827 (p<0,001). Pacientes que presentan extravasaciones 2010/2009: RR: 0,804 (p<0,001).Pacientes que presentan obstrucciones 2010/2009: RR:0,954 (p=0,554). Conclusiones. Un listado de recordatorios que incluye los pacientes con acceso vascular y la fecha de éste, ha servido para disminuir el número de flebitis y extravasaciones, pero no las obstrucciones(AU)

Background. The main purpose of this paper is to measure the clinical impact of the implementation of a reminder system that would warn of patients who are at risk of presenting an adverse event (AE) related to the peripheral venous catheter. Method. On the basis of the registers used for monitoring intravenous catheters, an automated consultation was realized that elaborated a list of the patients admitted, including: date of admission, date of the insertion of the venous access device, and type of device. It was implanted in January 2010and updated three times a day with the computers of the unit. A quasi-experimental study has measured the cumulative incidence of phlebitis, extravasation and obstructions in the patients registered in 2009 and 2010. The association between qualitative variables was evaluated with the Chisquared test, and relative risk (RR) and Number Needed to Treat (NNT) were estimated. Results. Nine thousand two hundred and sixty-three patientswere registered in the studied units in the year 2009, and 9,220 patients in 2010. The results were the following: Patients with phlebitis 2010/2009: RR: 0.827 (p < 0.001). Patients with extravasations 2010/2009: RR: 0.804 (p < 0.001).Patients with obstructions 2010/2009: RR: 0.954 (p < 0.554).Conclusion. With the help of a reminder list (which includes the patients with vascular access and the date), there has been a decrease in the number of phlebitis and extravasations but not in the number of obstructions(AU)

[Impact of implementation of reminders to reduce adverse effects in patients with peripheral venous catheterizations]. / Impacto de la implantación de recordatorios para disminuir eventos adversos en pacientes con accesos venosos periféricos.

BACKGROUND: The main purpose of this paper is to measure the clinical impact of the implementation of a reminder system that would warn of patients who are at risk of presenting an adverse event (AE) related to the peripheral venous catheter. METHOD: On the basis of the registers used for monitoring intravenous catheters, an automated consultation was realized that elaborated a list of the patients admitted, including: date of admission, date of the insertion of the venous access device, and type of device. It was implanted in January 2010 and updated three times a day with the computers of the unit. A quasi-experimental study has measured the cumulative incidence of phlebitis, extravasation and obstructions in the patients registered in 2009 and 2010. The association between qualitative variables was evaluated with the Chi-squared test, and relative risk (RR) and Number Needed to Treat (NNT) were estimated. RESULTS: Nine thousand two hundred and sixty-three patients were registered in the studied units in the year 2009, and 9,220 patients in 2010. The results were the following: Patients with phlebitis 2010/2009: RR: 0.827 (p < 0.001). Patients with extravasations 2010/2009: RR: 0.804 (p < 0.001). Patients with obstructions 2010/2009: RR: 0.954 (p < 0.554). CONCLUSION: With the help of a reminder list (which includes the patients with vascular access and the date), there has been a decrease in the number of phlebitis and extravasations but not in the number of obstructions.