Arthralgia with risk of progression to psoriatic arthritis: role of clinical assessments and ultrasound as prognostic factors.

OBJECTIVES: Referral of patients from dermatology to rheumatology practices due to psoriasis is unnecessary delayed. Many times musculoskeletal symptoms are the first reason for consultation. We aimed to estimate the proportion of ARP-PsA (arthralgia with risk to progression) defined by patients with arthralgia and the presence of psoriasis and/or a family history. Also, identify clinical, laboratory, and imaging prognostic factors of PsA progression within the ARP-PsA group over a one-year follow-up period. METHODS: Patients were included in a comprehensive arthralgia evaluation program, with the ARP-PsA criteria defined as arthralgia with Pso and/or a family history of Pso, not referred from dermatology. Baseline characteristics were analyzed, and the progression to PsA at one year was assessed. Multivariate analysis identified predictor features for progression. RESULTS: Of the 1419 patients, 8.4% met ARP-PsA criteria, and 29% of this subgroup developed PsA at one year. Baseline differences between those who developed PsA and those who did not included family history, Pso duration, pain severity, joint count, and imaging findings (X-ray and ultrasound). Multivariate analysis revealed the predictive significance of a combination of Pso plus family history of psoriasis disease, synovitis by Power Doppler ultrasound, ultrasound enthesopathy findings, and low tender joint count. CONCLUSION: The frequency of patients ARP-PsA was 8.4%, of whom 29% developed PsA at 1-year. The main predictor variables for this progression were identified.

Detection of systemic autoimmune diseases in an ongoing assessment program for hand arthralgias. A comparative analysis with inflammatory and non-inflammatory arthropathies.

INTRODUCTION: Arthralgias are prevalent in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD), emphasizing the need for early recognition. This study aimed to estimate SARD frequency and compare clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings among SARD, non-inflammatory arthralgia (NIA), and RA in patients with hand arthralgias. METHODS: A prospective evaluation program included individuals aged ≥18 with hand arthralgias. Baseline assessments covered clinical, laboratory, ultrasound, and radiography. Follow-up diagnoses categorized patients into SARD, NIA, and RA groups. Comparison between groups was performed using parametric and non-parametric tests. Two multivariate logistic regression analyzes were performed using the final diagnosis of SARD as the dependent variable (NIA and RA). ROC curves were calculated in those variables that presented an independent association in the multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Among 1053 patients, 9.6% were SARD (SLE 47%). Comparing SARD with NIA revealed higher CRP levels, power Doppler, less rhizarthrosis in ultrasound, and more ANA positivity in SARD patients. Distinct differences were observed between SARD and RA patients in terms of pain levels, swollen joints, metacarpophalangeal involvement and morning symptoms. Diagnostic markers demonstrated specific sensitivities and specificities: ANA for SARD versus NIA (82%, 34%), US not finding rhizarthrosis for SARD versus NIA (66%, 85%), CRP (cut-off >2.5 mg/L) sensitivity 52%, specificity 60%, AUC 0.62, RA antibodies (RF, 11 IU/mL) sensitivity 76%, specificity 74%, AUC 0.8, ACPA (1.25) sensitivity 50%, specificity 98%, AUC 0.7, ANA+ sensitivity 95%, specificity 32%, AUC 0.7, and US absence of synovitis sensitivity 82%, specificity 34%, AUC 0.75. CONCLUSION: This study highlights distinct clinical, laboratory, and imaging features differentiating SARD-related hand arthralgia from non-SARD hand arthralgia and RA.