Patient-perceived understanding of home-going medication with transitions of care services at a pediatric institution.

BACKGROUND: Transitions of care (TOC) is the coordination and continuity of health care as a patient transfers between different settings. This can include a wide range of services, such as medication reconciliation, patient counseling, bedside delivery of medications, and others that meet individual patient needs. In the pediatric population, patients are at increased risk of potential medication errors and subsequent harm owing to reduced patient and caregiver health literacy, limited dosage form availability, and errors in medication administration. The use of TOC services at the time of hospital discharge in this population has the potential to make a positive impact on patient safety and the treatment of medical conditions. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to determine whether patient-perceived understanding of home-going medications was greater in patients and/or caregivers who received medication bedside delivery and education from a pharmacy-led TOC service at a large pediatric academic medical center. The secondary objective was to determine whether the primary practice area of the pharmacist providing medication education led to changes in understanding of home-going medication(s). METHODS: Using institution-wide, patient satisfaction surveys from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021, patient and caregiver responses were queried for 2 questions about home-going medications, relating to the understanding of administration and the potential adverse effects. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on TOC services received, as documented in the electronic medical record (EMR). Survey responses for each of the 2 questions were categorized as top-box percentage by study group. Hypothesis testing between study groups for the primary and secondary outcomes were conducted using chi-squared tests at an alpha of 0.05. Statistical analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.4. RESULTS: Of the 1159 patients included in the study, 441 received TOC services, deemed the intervention group, and 718 did not receive TOC services, deemed the control group. When the intervention and control group were asked about understanding of medication administration, 96.37% versus 93.18% of patients (P = 0.007) gave the most favorable response of "yes, definitely," respectively. Furthermore, 78.51% versus 77.44% of patients (P = 0.053) gave the most favorable response when asked about understanding potential medication adverse effects, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving TOC services by a member of the pharmacy team had a greater score for understanding of both medication administration and adverse effects. Furthermore, this greater score was consistent among the education provided by the inpatient and outpatient pharmacist.

Impact of pharmacist alternative therapy interventions in a pediatric Medicaid population.

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory clinical pharmacists are viewed as the medication experts on the health care team and frequently assist with medication access concerns. However, medication access and insurance navigation are difficult because of wide variations in insurance formularies. Accountable care organizations (ACOs) incorporate pharmacists as members of their population health teams to assist with these efforts. These ACO pharmacists are uniquely positioned to assist pediatric ambulatory care pharmacists with medication access concerns. This collaboration has the potential to not only improve patient care but also provide cost savings. OBJECTIVE: To estimate cost savings to an ACO derived from alternative therapy interventions made by pharmacists embedded in pediatric ambulatory clinics, using resources created by ACO pharmacists, within a pediatric Medicaid population. The secondary objectives were to quantify the frequency of alternative therapy interventions provided by these pharmacists, evaluate the impact on medication access through the avoidance of prior authorizations (PAs), and assess the frequency and cost savings of alternative therapy interventions per treatment category. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of alternative therapy interventions provided by pediatric ambulatory care pharmacists within a health-system in central Ohio. Interventions were collected within an electronic health record from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020. Cost savings were calculated using average wholesale pricing, and PA avoidance was quantified. RESULTS: A total of 278 alternative therapy interventions were made with an estimated cost savings of $133,191.43. Primary care clinics (n = 181, 65%) had the most documented interventions. A total of 174 (63%) interventions resulted in the avoidance of a PA. The antiallergen (28%) treatment category had the most documented interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Alternative therapy interventions were provided by pediatric ambulatory care pharmacists in collaboration with pharmacists working for an ACO. The use of ACO prescribing resources can result in cost savings to an ACO and PA avoidance within a pediatric Medicaid population. DISCLOSURES: The statistical analysis of this work was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (CTSA Grant UL1TR002733). Dr Sebastian discloses her role as a pharmacy consultant for Molina Healthcare Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee. All other authors declare no relevant conflicts of interest or financial relationships.

Economic impact of pharmacist interventions in pediatric ambulatory care clinics.

OBJECTIVES: Ambulatory care pharmacists have a unique opportunity to identify and prevent adverse drug events (ADEs) throughout a patient's treatment course. These interventions can reduce unexpected clinic visits or hospitalizations, which may lead to decreased health care costs. However, research on this topic has not been conducted in the pediatric population. This study explored the economic impact of pharmacist interventions related to ADEs in pediatric ambulatory care clinics. The primary objective was to determine the total cost avoidance of pharmacist interventions associated with the prevention or management of ADEs in pediatric ambulatory care clinics. The secondary objectives were to describe and quantify pharmacist interventions related to the prevention and management of ADEs in pediatric ambulatory care clinics. METHODS: Pharmacist interventions from pediatric ambulatory care clinics were collected from an electronic health record. These interventions were categorized into 1 of 4 categories: Drug interaction, drug not indicated, prevent or manage ADE, or prevent or manage drug allergy. A review panel consisting of ambulatory care pharmacists reviewed the interventions. The expected probability of the event occurring was classified according to the Nesbit method (0-0.6), and the level of care necessary to treat the potential ADE was determined. The levels of care included hospitalization, ambulatory care, and self-care. The cost avoidance associated with each prevented ADE was calculated by multiplying the probability of the ADE occurring by the average charge of the expected level of care. RESULTS: Of the 8755 interventions documented, 212 were included, leading to a total cost avoidance of $307,210 (range $76,802-$1,071,053). The estimated cost avoidance from each ADE subtype was $128,283 from drug interaction, $20,727 from drug not indicated, $157,993 from prevent or manage ADE, and $207 from prevent or manage drug allergy. CONCLUSION: Pediatric ambulatory care pharmacists optimize health care cost savings through the prevention and management of ADEs as integrated members of the health care team.

Effect of drug disposal bag provision on families' disposal of children's unused opioids.

OBJECTIVE: One strategy to combat opioid misuse is to remove excess opioids from circulation by providing patients with drug disposal products that enable the safe disposal of opioids. We aimed to evaluate opioid use and disposal of unused opioids among children and young adults before and after pharmacy staff at our institution began to provide patients and families filling opioid prescriptions with a drug disposal bag. METHODS: We performed a prospective pre-post cohort study of patients who filled an opioid prescription in May-August 2019 at the outpatient pharmacies of a large tertiary children's hospital. Patients and caregivers were enrolled at the time the opioids were dispensed. During the first half of the study period, standard opioid-related education was offered by pharmacy staff. During the second half of the study period, standard education was offered, and a drug disposal bag and instructions on its use were provided when the opioids were dispensed. A follow-up survey to assess opioid use and disposal was completed online or by telephone 4-7 weeks after the opioids were dispensed. RESULTS: A total of 215 participants were enrolled; 117 received a drug disposal bag and 98 did not. Of those, 68% of the participants completed a follow-up survey. In both groups, the median patient age was 11 years, and most patients had been prescribed opioids after a procedure. More than 70% had opioids leftover after they had stopped taking them, and this did not vary by group. However, among families with leftover opioids, the receipt of a drug disposal bag was associated with a higher likelihood of disposal of the unused opioids (71.7% vs. 52.1%, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Providing a drug disposal bag to families of children receiving opioids increases the likelihood of excess opioid disposal. Greater availability of drug disposal products can complement prescribing reduction efforts aimed at decreasing prescription opioid misuse.

Evaluation of medication safety resources in pediatric hospitals.

PURPOSE: As health systems continue to expand pharmacy and clinical services, the ability to evaluate potential medication safety risks and mitigate errors remains a high priority. Workload and productivity monitoring tools for the assessment of operational and clinical pharmacy services exist. However, such tools are not currently available to justify medication safety pharmacy services. The purpose of this study is to determine methods used to assess, allocate, and justify medication safety resources in pediatric hospitals. METHODS: A 32-question survey was designed and distributed utilizing the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) tool. The survey was disseminated to 46 pediatric hospitals affiliated with the Children's Hospital Association (CHA). The survey was distributed in October 2018, and the respondents were given 3 weeks to submit responses. Data analysis includes the use of descriptive statistics. Categorical variables were summarized by frequencies and percentages to distinguish the differences between pediatric health systems. RESULTS: Of 26 respondents, 15.4% utilized metrics to justify medication safety resources. Metrics utilized were based on medication dispenses, projects, and error coding. Twenty-three percent of respondents were dissatisfied with current pharmacy-based medication safety resources within the organization. There was variability of medication safety resources within pediatric hospitals, including the number of dedicated full-time equivalents, time spent on tasks, and task prioritization. CONCLUSION: Assessing medication safety resources at various pediatric hospitals highlights several potential barriers and opportunities. This information will serve as the foundation for the creation of a standardized workload assessment tool to assist pharmacy leaders with additional resource justification.

Pharmacist Involvement in Population Health Management for a Pediatric Managed Medicaid Accountable Care Organization.

Accountable care organizations (ACOs) have emerged as an effective healthcare delivery model for managing quality and cost at a population level. Within ACOs, pharmacists are critical for the delivery of high-value health care, offering patients and health care providers medication-related training, resources, and guidance that can improve quality of care at lower costs. Partners For Kids (PFK), one of the oldest and largest pediatric ACOs in the country, has successfully leveraged pharmacists to provide population health management and medication management to promote health outcomes for individual patients and the overall population it serves. This review explores how the inclusion of pharmacists in the development and execution of various quality improvement initiatives within PFK has positively impacted outcomes for patients while also lowering overall spend. A catalog of interventions is provided to offer various ways that pharmacists can intersect as providers in the triad of patient/family, payor, and provider. By providing enhanced training and education, on-site guidance, medication management, and population-level data analysis, pharmacists are able to identify and improve inefficiencies in care. Moving forward, ongoing engagement of pharmacists in health care operations will be a necessary feature to maximize health care value.

Standardized documentation workflow within an electronic health record to track pharmacists' interventions in pediatric ambulatory care clinics.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the implementation of a standardized documentation workflow within an electronic health record (EHR) and to track pharmacists' interventions in pediatric ambulatory care clinics. SETTING: Ambulatory care clinics and a transitions-of-care (TOC) service within a pediatric health care system in central Ohio. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION: Ambulatory clinical pharmacists work as integrated members of the health care team in 7 pediatric ambulatory care clinics and a TOC service to achieve the best medication-related outcomes for patients. PRACTICE INNOVATION: A standardized documentation workflow was established among ambulatory clinical pharmacists to document the interventions made in their practice settings with the use of a tool in the EHR. A weekly report from the EHR was run by a technician to gather intervention data, identify reimbursable opportunities, and document and bill via a separate Internet-based medication therapy management platform. EVALUATION: The success of the new documentation workflow was evaluated, and continuous feedback was gathered from the pharmacists and the billing technician. Updates were provided to the ambulatory clinical pharmacist at monthly staff meetings and workflow changes implemented as needed. RESULTS: A total of 5210 interventions were documented by the pharmacists in various intervention categories. The 3 most common intervention categories included patient and medication education (1765), medication reconciliations (1170), and compliance assessments (795). CONCLUSION: A standardized documentation workflow allowed for consistent tracking of interventions across ambulatory care clinics and a TOC service. Key elements to the successful implementation of this new documentation workflow included proper training and continuous feedback to the ambulatory clinical pharmacists, assistance from a billing technician, and consistent documentation by the ambulatory clinical pharmacists.

Pharmacist impact on pediatric vaccination errors and missed opportunities in the setting of clinical decision support.

OBJECTIVE: To determine pharmacist impact on vaccination errors and missed opportunities in the pediatric primary care setting with the presence of clinical decision support (CDS) by comparing a clinic with a pharmacist and CDS to a clinic with CDS alone. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review of patients' electronic medical records compared vaccination errors and missed opportunities between 2 pediatric primary care clinics. SETTING: Two urban, pediatric primary care clinics were selected for the study. PARTICIPANTS: Encounters were included in the analysis for children presenting for any visit over a 3-month period. INTERVENTION: The intervention clinic had a full-time clinical pharmacist and CDS. The comparison clinic had CDS alone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Vaccination errors were defined as follows: doses administered before minimum recommended age, doses administered before minimum recommended dosing interval, unnecessary doses, and invalid doses for a combination of these reasons. Missed opportunities were defined as vaccine doses due at the date of encounter but not administered, without documented reason for vaccination delay or refusal by provider or patient. The likelihood of missing an opportunity was also assessed for patient age, visit type, and provider type. RESULTS: One thousand and twenty patient encounters were randomly selected and reviewed. The vaccination error rate was 0.4% in the comparison group and 0% in the intervention group (P = 0.4995). The number of encounters with a missed opportunity was significantly higher in the comparison group compared with the intervention group (51 vs. 30 encounters with missed opportunities; P = 0.015; adjusted odds ratio, 2.14 [95% CI 1.3-35]). CONCLUSION: Although the use of CDS results in a low rate of vaccination errors, technology cannot be solely relied on for vaccination recommendations in the pediatric population because of the rigidity of CDS configuration. Pharmacists continue to play a vital role to ensure that children are appropriately vaccinated in the primary care setting.

Reduction of immunization errors through practitioner education and addition of age-specific alerts in the electronic prescribing system.

PURPOSE: The reduction of immunization errors through the use of age-specific alerts within the electronic medical record (EMR) and mandatory interactive education for prescribers is described. METHODS: A health system-wide initiative was implemented at an academic pediatric hospital to reduce the number of immunization errors. The preimplementation period (January 1-December 31, 2013) involved a baseline review of adverse drug events (ADEs) reported through a voluntary event reporting system to determine the number and types of immunization errors. During the prescribing phase of the medication-use process, 57% (43 of 75) of errors occurred. First, age-based restrictions were implemented within the EMR. This was followed by mandatory immunization education for all prescribers working in the primary care network. Data collection included all reported vaccine errors within the voluntary event reporting system and completion rates of education by physicians, nurse practitioners, and medical residents. RESULTS: During the seven-month postimplementation period (January 1- July 31, 2014), prescribing events decreased from 57% to 25%. Following implementation of age-specific immunization alerts and mandatory prescriber education, the hospital went 175 days without a vaccine ADE. CONCLUSION: The implementation of age-specific alerts within the EMR and mandatory prescriber education decreased the number of immunization errors within a pediatric health system.

Impact of pharmacist integration in a pediatric primary care clinic on vaccination errors: a retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE: To measure the impact of ambulatory clinical pharmacist integration in a pediatric primary care clinic on vaccination error rates and to evaluate missed opportunities. METHODS: A retrospective, quasi-experimental review of electronic medical records of visit encounters during a 3-month period compared vaccine error rates and missed opportunities between two pediatric residency primary care clinics. The intervention clinic has a full-time ambulatory clinical pharmacist integrated into the health care team. Pharmacy services were not provided at the comparison clinic. A vaccine error was defined as follows: doses administered before minimum recommended age, doses administered before minimum recommended spacing from a previous dose, doses administered unnecessarily, live virus vaccination administered too close to a previous live vaccine, and doses invalid for combinations of these reasons. RESULTS: 900 encounters were randomly selected and reviewed. The error rate was found to be 0.28% in the intervention clinic and 2.7% in the comparison clinic. The difference in error rates was found to be significant (P = 0.0021). The number of encounters with greater than or equal to one missed opportunity was significantly higher in the comparison clinic compared with the intervention clinic (29.3% vs. 10.2%; P <0.0001). CONCLUSION: The pediatric primary care clinic with a pharmacist had reductions in vaccination errors as well as missed opportunities. Pharmacists play a key role in the pediatric primary care team to improve the appropriate use of vaccines.