Combined versus subtraction-only technique in parathyroid scintigraphy: effect on scan interpretation.

INTRODUCTION: Parathyroidectomy is the choice of treatment for patients with primary and tertiary hyperparathyroidism. Scintigraphic, preoperative localization of hyperfunctioning parathyroid tissue depends on either a delayed washout technique, a subtraction technique, or a combination of the two. The rationale for adopting a combination approach is its presumed superior sensitivity, but there is limited evidence to support this strategy at the cost of patient inconvenience and impact on departmental workflows. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a combined technique detects any additional lesions during scan interpretation compared to using subtraction-only technique in patients undergoing parathyroid scintigraphy before surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of parathyroid scans at Tygerberg Hospital between January 2012 and April 2018. Scans were reinterpreted by consensus by three readers, blinded to the original interpretation. A McNemar discordant pairs analysis was then performed. RESULTS: A total of 97 participant scans were reviewed (female: 71; mean age: 50.8 years). The number of patients with primary, secondary, and tertiary hyperparathyroidism were 63, 21, and 13, respectively. A total of 192 lesions were identified in this study. While both combined and subtraction-only approaches identified hyperfunctioning parathyroid lesions, only four lesions were identified using the combined technique that were missed by the subtraction technique. This result was not statistically significant (P = 0.125). CONCLUSION: Based on our findings, the combined parathyroid scintigraphic technique does not improve lesion detection and may be dispensed with. Doing so will enhance patient convenience and comfort and improve departmental workflows without compromising lesion detection.

Point-of-care ultrasound education for non-physician clinicians in a resource-limited emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the outcomes and curriculum components of an educational programme to train non-physician clinicians working in a rural, Ugandan emergency department in the use of POC ultrasound. METHODS: The use of point-of-care ultrasound was taught to emergency care providers through lectures, bedsides teaching and hands-on practical sessions. Lectures were tailored to care providers' knowledge base and available therapeutic means. Every ultrasound examination performed by these providers was recorded over 4.5 years. Findings of these examinations were categorised as positive, negative, indeterminate or procedural. Other radiologic studies ordered over this same time period were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 22,639 patients were evaluated in the emergency department by emergency care providers, and 2185 point-of-care ultrasound examinations were performed on 1886 patients. Most commonly used were the focused assessment with sonography in trauma examination (53.3%) and echocardiography (16.4%). Point-of-care ultrasound studies were performed more frequently than radiology department-performed studies. Positive findings were documented in 46% of all examinations. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a novel curriculum for point-of-care ultrasound education of non-physician emergency practitioners in a resource-limited setting. These non-physician clinicians integrated ultrasound into clinical practice and utilised this imaging modality more frequently than traditional radiology department imaging with a large proportion of positive findings.