Transient meningism in children after non-autologous duraplasty for Chiari Malformation surgery: A case series.

BACKGROUND: Increasing the posterior fossa volume is the mainstay of treatment for Chiari type 1 Malformation (C1M) and type 1.5 (C1.5M). Different options to restore CSF flow have been described but no consensus has been reached yet. Bony decompression of posterior cranial fossa with dural opening provides good results but at the price of complications such as pseudomeningocele and aseptic meningitis. A single center retrospective analysis was conducted to find any relationships between outcome and perioperative factors. As a second goal a specific analysis was conducted on the complications and their hypothetical causes. METHODS: All the pediatric patients who underwent to posterior fossa bony decompression and dural opening for C1M or C1.5M in the period 2008-2020 were included in the study. A minimum period of three-months follow-up was considered among the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: A population of fifty-three consecutive patients was collected. Pseudomeningocele and a mild meningeal irritation resulted the most frequent complications. Considering preoperative and intraoperative factors, the type of dural graft showed a relatively strong correlation (P<.01) with pseudomeningocele appearance and the development of meningism. In the latter case, a short course of steroids was the only treatment required to control symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Different factors could influence the outcome in Chiari Malformation surgery and eventually the development of complications. An adequate dural graft selection is of paramount importance when a dural opening for posterior fossa augmentation is planned. In case of mild meningeal irritation, a trial with short course steroids could avoid revision surgery.

Innovative tools for quality assessment: integrated quality criteria for review of multiple study designs (ICROMS).

OBJECTIVES: With the aim to facilitate a more comprehensive review process in public health including patient safety, we established a tool that we have termed ICROMS (Integrated quality Criteria for the Review Of Multiple Study designs), which unifies, integrates and refines current quality criteria for a large range of study designs including qualitative research. STUDY DESIGN: Review, pilot testing and expert consensus. METHODS: The tool is the result of an iterative four phase process over two years: 1) gathering of established criteria for assessing controlled, non-controlled and qualitative study designs; 2) pilot testing of a first version in two systematic reviews on behavioural change in infection prevention and control and in antibiotic prescribing; 3) further refinement and adding of additional study designs in the context of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control funded project 'Systematic review and evidence-based guidance on organisation of hospital infection control programmes' (SIGHT); 4) scrutiny by the pan-European expert panel of the SIGHT project, which had the objective of ensuring robustness of the systematic review. RESULTS: ICROMS includes established quality criteria for randomised studies, controlled before-and-after studies and interrupted time series, and incorporates criteria for non-controlled before-and-after studies, cohort studies and qualitative studies. The tool consists of two parts: 1) a list of quality criteria specific for each study design, as well as criteria applicable across all study designs by using a scoring system; 2) a 'decision matrix', which specifies the robustness of the study by identifying minimum requirements according to the study type and the relevance of the study to the review question. The decision matrix directly determines inclusion or exclusion of a study in the review. ICROMS was applied to a series of systematic reviews to test its feasibility and usefulness in the appraisal of multiple study designs. The tool was applicable across a wide range of study designs and outcome measures. CONCLUSION: ICROMS is a comprehensive yet feasible appraisal of a large range of study designs to be included in systematic reviews addressing behaviour change studies in patient safety and public health. The tool is sufficiently flexible to be applied to a variety of other domains in health-related research. Beyond its application to systematic reviews, we envisage that ICROMS can have a positive effect on researchers to be more rigorous in their study design and more diligent in their reporting.

An unusual cause of dysphagia: "DISHphagia".

Progressive dysphagia and dyspnoea presenting after major neck trauma can occasionally be secondary to post-traumatic inflammation and mass effect associated with a calcified osteophytic anterior longitudinal ligament, a frequent finding in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis, though rarely enough to cause such symptoms. In these circumstances, surgical decompression may prove effective.

[Changes in kidney glomeruli in relation to the time of death]. / Modificazione dei glomeruli renali in relazione all'epoca della morte.

The estimation of the time of death is until today a medico-legal problem only partially solved. We have studied, by scanning electron microscopy, post-mortem changes of human glomerula in anatomical structures (capillary endothelium) and in times of death (9-15 hrs) barely considered until now. We observed changes reported by other Authors (altered microvillus morphology, podocyte surface blebs, swelling and retraction of pedicles) as well as interesting changes of capillary endothelium which is still present, even if clearly altered 9 hrs post-mortem, whereas it is no more visible 15 hrs after the death.