Tourniquet Use Does Not Affect Pain and Function after Total Knee Arthroplasty: Patient Evaluation According to Pain Threshold.

We evaluated the effect of using a tourniquet on early-stage pain and 1-year postoperative functional outcomes when patients were divided into two groups according to the pain threshold (PT). Overall, 120 patients who were assessed preoperatively with an algometer were recruited for this prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized to undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a tourniquet (group 1, 60 patients) and without tourniquet (group 2, 60 patients). Primary outcome measures were visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at 24, 36, and 48 hours postoperatively and functional assessment with Knee Society Score (KSS) test at 1 year postoperatively. No significant differences were observed between groups in terms of gender (49 females and 8 males in group 1 vs. 53 females and 6 males in group 2; p = 0.201) and age (68.9 years in group 1 vs. 68.7 years in group 2; p = 0.811). There was no significant difference between groups in all the VAS and KSS 1 and KSS 2 scores. PT measurements ranged from 2.5 to 11.5 with a mean of 7.69 ± 1.70 and a median of 8. Total 54 patients with a median value of < 8 were defined as the low-PT group, and 62 patients with a median value of ≥ 8 were defined as the high-PT group. When the groups were evaluated according to using the tourniquet, 21 patients were operated on with a tourniquet and 33 patients without it in the low-PT group, while 36 patients were operated on with a tourniquet and 26 patients without it in the high-PT group. There was no significant difference in pain or functional scores between patients when comparing with-tourniquet and without-tourniquet or when comparing the low- and high-PT groups. This showed that the use of a tourniquet during TKA was not associated with either early-stage pain or 1-year postoperative functional outcomes according to algometer evaluation.Level of evidence: Level 1 prospective randomized study.

Predictive Factors and Amputation Level for Reamputation in Patients With Diabetic Foot: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.

The aim of this study was to assess the rate and level of reamputation in patients who had a previous amputation from diabetic foot. We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent amputation and reamputation due to diabetic foot in our clinic between 2011 and 2019. Fifty-nine were evaluated as the healed group after the first amputation and 55 were evaluated as the reamputation group. Given 55 patients who needed reamputation: there were 13 finger or ray, 23 transmetatarsal or syme, 18 transtibial, and 1 transfemoral in the first operation. We found the reamputation rate was 65.4% in distal amputations. When serum parameters were examined before the first amputation in each group, there was no statistically significant difference in white blood cells, neutrophils, lymphocytes, platelets, sedimentation, C-reactive protein, total protein, hematocrit, urea, creatinine, and HgA1c values. There was, however, a significant difference between groups in albumin levels. When comorbidities were assessed for smoking, hypertension, duration of diabetes, and number of debridements after the first surgery, a significant difference between groups was found. When peripheral artery disease and chronic renal failure were examined, no significant difference was observed. In our study, it was observed that the rate of reamputation was higher in distal level amputations for diabetic foot patients. Accordingly, albumin values, smoking, hypertension, duration of diabetes, number of debridements after surgery, were seen as risk factors for reamputation patients.

Mid-long term results of manipulation and arthroscopic release in frozen shoulder / Resultados a médio e longo prazo da manipulação e liberação artroscópica de ombro congelado

ABSTRACT Objective: Surgical treatment options should be discussed in cases of frozen shoulder, which is usually treated in a conservative manner. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of manipulation and arthroscopic release in cases of frozen shoulder which resisted conservative treatment. Methods: A total of 32 patients who underwent manipulation and arthroscopic capsular release in 34 shoulders were included in the study. The average follow-up period was 49.5 months (range: 24-90 months). No reason for onset could be found in 8 (25%) patients, who were classified as primary frozen shoulder; twenty-four (75%) patients were classified as secondary frozen shoulder due to underlying pathologies. The average pre-operative complaint period was 11 months (range: 3-24 months). After arthroscopic examination, manipulation was performed first, followed by arthroscopic capsular release. The range of motion in both shoulders was compared before the procedure and in the last follow-up visit. Constant and Oxford classifications were used to assess functional results, and the results were assessed statistically. Results: Patient values for passive elevation, abduction, adduction-external rotation, abduction-external rotation, and abduction-internal rotation increased in a statistically significant manner between the preoperative assessment and follow-up evaluation (p<0.01). The average change of 47.97±21.03 units observed in the patients' values obtained in the control measurements against the pre-op Constant scores was determined to be statistically significant (p<0.01). According to the Oxford classification, 29 shoulders were sufficient. Conclusion: Successful results can be obtained with arthroscopic release performed after manipulation in patients with frozen shoulder resistant to conservative treatment. Level of Evidence IV, Case Series.

RESUMO Objetivo: As opções de tratamento cirúrgico devem ser discutidas nos casos de ombro congelado que, em geral, são tratadas de modo conservador. Neste estudo, avaliamos a eficácia da manipulação e da liberação artroscópica nos casos de ombro congelado refratário ao tratamento conservador. Métodos: Um total de 32 pacientes submetidos a manipulação e liberação capsular artroscópica em 34 ombros foram incluídos no estudo. O período médio de acompanhamento foi de 49,5 meses (faixa: 24 a 90 meses). Não foi possível determinar o motivo do início da afecção em 8 (25%) pacientes, que foram classificados como ombro congelado primário; 24 (75%) pacientes foram classificados como ombro congelado secundário, devido a patologias subjacentes. O período médio de queixa pré-operatória foi de 11 meses (faixa: 3 a 24 meses). Depois do exame artroscópico, realizou-se manipulação, seguida por liberação capsular artroscópica. A amplitude de movimento em ambos os ombros foi comparada antes do procedimento e na última visita de acompanhamento. As classificações de Constant e Oxford foram usadas para avaliar os resultados funcionais, e os resultados foram avaliados estatisticamente. Resultados: Os valores dos pacientes para elevação, abdução, adução-rotação externa, abdução-rotação externa e abdução-rotação interna aumentaram de modo estatisticamente significante entre a avaliação pré-operatória e a do acompanhamento (p < 0,01). A mudança média de 47,97 ± 21,03 unidades observada nos valores dos pacientes, obtidos nas medidas de controle com relação aos escores de Constant no pré-operatório foi determinada como estatisticamente significante (p < 0,01). De acordo com a classificação de Oxford, 29 ombros foram suficientes. Conclusão: Os resultados bem-sucedidos podem ser atingidos com liberação artroscópica realizada depois da manipulação dos pacientes com ombro congelado, resistentes ao tratamento conservador. Nível de Evidência IV, Série de Casos.

Isolated HAGL lesion after arthroscopic Bankart repair in a professional soccer player.

Post-traumatic anterior shoulder instability commonly occurs following an avulsion of capsulolabral complex from glenoid (Bankart lesion) or rarely after humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligaments (HAGL lesion). Arthroscopic Bankart repair offers high success rates of healing. However, trauma following the treatment may cause implant failure or re-avulsion of the treated tissue. We aim to present the diagnosis and treatment of an isolated HAGL lesion in a professional soccer player who had previously undergone arthroscopic Bankart repair.

MID-LONG TERM RESULTS OF MANIPULATION AND ARTHROSCOPIC RELEASE IN FROZEN SHOULDER.

OBJECTIVE: Surgical treatment options should be discussed in cases of frozen shoulder, which is usually treated in a conservative manner. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of manipulation and arthroscopic release in cases of frozen shoulder which resisted conservative treatment. METHODS: A total of 32 patients who underwent manipulation and arthroscopic capsular release in 34 shoulders were included in the study. The average follow-up period was 49.5 months (range: 24-90 months). No reason for onset could be found in 8 (25%) patients, who were classified as primary frozen shoulder; twenty-four (75%) patients were classified as secondary frozen shoulder due to underlying pathologies. The average pre-operative complaint period was 11 months (range: 3-24 months). After arthroscopic examination, manipulation was performed first, followed by arthroscopic capsular release. The range of motion in both shoulders was compared before the procedure and in the last follow-up visit. Constant and Oxford classifications were used to assess functional results, and the results were assessed statistically. RESULTS: Patient values for passive elevation, abduction, adduction-external rotation, abduction-external rotation, and abduction-internal rotation increased in a statistically significant manner between the preoperative assessment and follow-up evaluation (p<0.01). The average change of 47.97±21.03 units observed in the patients' values obtained in the control measurements against the pre-op Constant scores was determined to be statistically significant (p<0.01). According to the Oxford classification, 29 shoulders were sufficient. CONCLUSION: Successful results can be obtained with arthroscopic release performed after manipulation in patients with frozen shoulder resistant to conservative treatment. Level of Evidence IV, Case Series.

OBJETIVO: As opções de tratamento cirúrgico devem ser discutidas nos casos de ombro congelado que, em geral, são tratadas de modo conservador. Neste estudo, avaliamos a eficácia da manipulação e da liberação artroscópica nos casos de ombro congelado refratário ao tratamento conservador. MÉTODOS: Um total de 32 pacientes submetidos a manipulação e liberação capsular artroscópica em 34 ombros foram incluídos no estudo. O período médio de acompanhamento foi de 49,5 meses (faixa: 24 a 90 meses). Não foi possível determinar o motivo do início da afecção em 8 (25%) pacientes, que foram classificados como ombro congelado primário; 24 (75%) pacientes foram classificados como ombro congelado secundário, devido a patologias subjacentes. O período médio de queixa pré-operatória foi de 11 meses (faixa: 3 a 24 meses). Depois do exame artroscópico, realizou-se manipulação, seguida por liberação capsular artroscópica. A amplitude de movimento em ambos os ombros foi comparada antes do procedimento e na última visita de acompanhamento. As classificações de Constant e Oxford foram usadas para avaliar os resultados funcionais, e os resultados foram avaliados estatisticamente. RESULTADOS: Os valores dos pacientes para elevação, abdução, adução-rotação externa, abdução-rotação externa e abdução-rotação interna aumentaram de modo estatisticamente significante entre a avaliação pré-operatória e a do acompanhamento (p < 0,01). A mudança média de 47,97 ± 21,03 unidades observada nos valores dos pacientes, obtidos nas medidas de controle com relação aos escores de Constant no pré-operatório foi determinada como estatisticamente significante (p < 0,01). De acordo com a classificação de Oxford, 29 ombros foram suficientes. CONCLUSÃO: Os resultados bem-sucedidos podem ser atingidos com liberação artroscópica realizada depois da manipulação dos pacientes com ombro congelado, resistentes ao tratamento conservador. Nível de Evidência IV, Série de Casos.

Bilateral intertrochanteric and femoral diaphyseal fractures with unilateral proximal tibial fracture: A case report and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Bilateral intertrochanteric femur fractures are relatively rare injuries. This study aims to present a case of a patient with simultaneous bilateral intertrochanteric femur fractures and femoral diaphyseal fractures and proximal tibial fracture with his twelve years follow-up. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 44-year-old man presented to emergency department after a motor vehicle accident. Bilateral intertrochanteric femur fractures (OTA classification - 31A.1.2) and bilateral femoral diaphyseal fractures (OTA classification - 32A.2) and nondisplaced right proximal tibial fracture (OTA classification - 41B.1) were determined in radiographs. Following closed reduction, fractures were fixed with intramedullary nails bilaterally. Proximal tibial fracture was fixed with cannulated screws following open reduction. At twelfth year follow-up he was able to do his daily activities with minimal limitation. DISCUSSION: High energy traumas, stress fractures, systemic disorders (osteomalacia, chronic renal failure), steroid treatments, seizures and electric injuries are possible causes for bilateral hip factures. However bilateral femoral diaphyseal fractures are mostly due to high energy traumas. Long-term biphosphonate use may also cause bilateral fractures. Single-stage surgery should be performed in order to avoid secondary damages of surgical interventions. All fractures of our patient were fixed in a single session. This prevented further deterioration of patient's status and made rehabilitation easy. CONCLUSION: Careful evaluation of all systems should be performed in multi-trauma patients to find out concomitant injuries. Single staged surgical treatment may decrease morbidities.

Early mobilization with customized TLSO brace in thoracolumbar burst fractures.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to research the effectiveness of customized thoracolumbosacral orthosis treatment for stable burst type thoracolumbar vertebral fractures without neurological deficits. METHODS: The study included 26 patients (14 males, 12 females; mean age: 46.03 years; range: 18 to 64 years) conservatively treated for thoracolumbar (T11-L2) burst type vertebral fractures according to Denis classification between 2002 and 2009. Etiology were a fall from various heights in 12 patients (46.2%), motor vehicle accidents as an occupant in 7 (26.9%) and as a pedestrian in 4 (15.4%), and simple fall in 3 (11.5%). None of the patients had neurologic deficit and no damage was found in the posterior ligamentous complex in MRI evaluations. Denis pain and functional scales were used in the clinical evaluation. Local kyphosis angle, sagittal index and height loss percentage were measured in the radiologic evaluation. Post-fracture and follow-up values were compared. Mean follow-up period was 41.30 (range: 14 to 80) months. RESULTS: Mean pain and functional scores were 1.65 and 1.15 points, respectively, at the final follow-up. Twenty patients returned to their pre-trauma work and activities completely and six patients with small limitations. Mean period for returning to work was 3.64 (range: 2 to 6) months. Local kyphosis angle, sagittal index and height loss percentage values increased significantly at follow-up (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The conservative treatment of stable thoracolumbar burst fractures is widely accepted. Early mobilization with customized TLSO brace appears to produce effective functional results despite loss of vertebral body height.

Intramedullary osteosynthesis of instable intertrochanteric femur fractures with Profin® nail in elderly patients.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the radiologic and functional results of patients with instable intertrochanteric femur fractures treated with Profin® nails. METHODS: This study included 32 patients (24 female, 8 male; mean age: 70.7 years; range: 65 to 96 years) who were treated with Profin® nails for instable intertrochanteric fractures. Fractures were caused by a simple fall in 30 patients and pedestrian accident in two. Eleven patients had Type 31-A2 and 21 patients had Type 31-A3 fractures according to the AO/OTA classification. Results were evaluated clinically and radiologically. Mean follow-up period was 17.3 (range: 12 to 23) months. RESULTS: Good or acceptable reduction was achieved in 93.7% of our patients. Mean surgery duration was 28.2 (range: 22 to 75) minutes and mean blood loss was 215 (range: 150 to 320) cc. Complete union was achieved in all patients at a mean of 17.6 (range: 15 to 22) weeks. Postoperative mean collodiaphyseal angle was 125.5 (range: 122 to 130) degrees and there was no significant difference with follow-up values (p>0.05). Twenty-two patients were able to walk with support and 10 without support after surgery. Mean Oxford hip score was 23.70 (range: 14 to 39) points. One year mortality rate was 18.75%. CONCLUSION: Good functional and radiologic results can be achieved using Profin® nails for unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures in elderly patients.

The results of surgical treatment for posttraumatic heterotopic ossification and ankylosis of the elbow.

OBJECTIVES: Heterotopic ossification which may develop following elbow injuries or elbow surgery may result in complete loss of elbow functions. We evaluated the results of surgical treatment for ankylosis of the elbow due to posttraumatic heterotopic ossification. METHODS: The study included seven patients (6 males, 1 female; mean age 36 years; range 23 to 55 years) who developed heterotopic ossification and ankylosis of the elbow joint following surgical treatment of high-energy fractures in the circumference of the elbow. Two patients had comminuted olecranon fractures and elbow luxation, and five patients had comminuted intra-articular distal humeral fractures. Three patients had open fractures. Involvement was in the right elbow in two patients, and in the left elbow in five patients. One patient was monitored and treated in the intensive care unit for head trauma for 22 days. Initially, six patients were treated with plate osteosynthesis and one patient with tension band wiring. Foci of heterotopic ossification were detected on the radiographs taken after a mean of 24 days (range 20 to 32 days) following surgical treatment of fractures. The patients were followed-up with conventional radiography and scintigraphy for a mean of 11 months (range 7 to 15 months) before surgical treatment, during which functional loss in elbow joint movements deteriorated and ankylosis developed. All the patients had Hastings type IIIC ankylosis and poor Mayo elbow performance scores (mean score 50.7). A posterior incision was used in three patients, and a double-column incision was used in four patients. At surgery, the ulnar nerve and the lateral and medial collateral ligaments were preserved, and a posterolateral capsular release, removal of heterotopic ossification, purging of the olecranon fossa, and resection of the tip of the olecranon were performed. After completion of capsular release, cartilage pathologies were evaluated. Four patients were found to have no definite cartilage damage, whereas in three patients the joint cartilage was seriously damaged. At final controls, the patients were assessed with the Mayo elbow performance score. The mean follow-up period was 23.4 months (range 10 to 36 months). RESULTS: In all cases, the range of motion and stability of the elbow joint were controlled and were found to be complete and stable at the end of the operation. At final controls, the Mayo elbow performance scores were good in three patients, moderate in one patient, and poor in three patients. All the patients with a poor elbow score had severe joint cartilage damage intraoperatively. CONCLUSION: Patients who develop heterotopic ossification and ankylosis of the elbow following trauma or elbow surgery may benefit from removal of heterotopic ossification foci and elbow relaxation procedures provided that there is not severe damage to the articular cartilage.