Fear of cancer recurrence therapy (FORT): A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Most fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) interventions have small effects, and few target FCR. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) with breast and gynecological cancer survivors evaluated the efficacy of a cognitive-existential fear of recurrence therapy (FORT) compared to an attention placebo control group (living well with cancer [LWWC]) on FCR. METHOD: One hundred and sixty-four women with clinical levels of FCR and cancer distress were randomly assigned to 6-weekly, 120 min FORT (n = 80) or LWWC (n = 84) group sessions. They completed questionnaires at baseline (T1), posttreatment (T2; primary endpoint), 3 (T3), and 6 months (T4) posttreatment. Generalized linear models were used to compare group differences in the fear of cancer recurrence inventory (FCRI) total score and secondary outcomes. RESULTS: FORT participants experienced greater reductions from T1 to T2 on FCRI total with a between-group difference of -9.48 points (p = .0393), resulting in a medium effect of -0.530, with a maintained effect at T3 (p = .0330) but not at T4. For the secondary outcomes, improvements were in favor of FORT, including FCRI triggers (p = .0208), FCRI coping (p = .0351), cognitive avoidance (p = .0155), need for reassurance from physicians (p = .0117), and quality of life (mental health; p = .0147). CONCLUSIONS: This RCT demonstrated that FORT, compared to an attention placebo control group, resulted in a greater reduction in FCR posttreatment and at 3 months posttreatment in women with breast and gynecological cancer, indicating its potential as a new treatment strategy. We recommend a booster session to sustain gains. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

de Souza interprofessional practice cancer competency framework.

PURPOSE: As the demand in cancer care continues to increase, health systems require a workforce of highly educated specialists and generalists to provide continuity of care across settings. OBJECTIVES: Led by de Souza Institute in Canada, an interdisciplinary working group was formed to develop a competency framework with relevance across regulated health professionals involved in cancer care. METHODS: The working group was presented with results from a scoping review of national and international guidelines, standards, and competencies in oncology, as well as data from needs assessments on continuing education opportunities and oncology topics most relevant to clinicians. Fifty-one professionals from, e.g., family medicine, pharmacy, social work, psychology, occupational therapy, and nursing participated in seven focus groups. An additional 32 nurses participated in a nursing-specific needs assessment survey. Using modified Delphi technique, working group members conducted three iterative rounds to review data and built consensus on competency items in relation to three levels of expertise, from early learner/novice practitioner, advancing practitioner, to expert practitioner. RESULTS: A final consensus was reached for the selection of competencies that reflect optimal cancer care mapped into three levels of expertise, as well as knowledge, skills, and attitudes expected of each level. Examples for the competency for early learner/novice practitioner include the following: Have awareness of common ethical issues in cancer care (knowledge); demonstrate ability to discuss, educate, and counsel patients and their support persons(s) regarding preferences (skills); and appreciate the impact of culture, the sensitivity, and diversity of attitudes in relation to cancer (attitude). Expert practitioner examples include: recognition of need for, and ability to advocate for challenges involving equity and access in order to improve health outcomes (skill) and awareness of workplace complexities, such as provider roles, team functioning, and organizational environments affecting patient-practitioner relationships (attitude). CONCLUSION: The de Souza Interprofessional practice cancer competency framework provides a set of shared competencies and a novice to expert pathway for clinicians across disciplines and supports a more standardized learning and comprehensive approach in organizing professional development towards a coordinated, high quality, and person-centered care.

Addressing fear of cancer recurrence among women with cancer: a feasibility and preliminary outcome study.

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is one of the most frequently cited unmet needs among cancer survivors and is associated with psychological distress, stress-response symptoms, and lower quality of life, as well as increased use of health care resources. Despite these factors, few manualized interventions exist to address FCR among cancer survivors. PURPOSE: To develop, manualize, and pilot test the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a 6-week cognitive-existential (CE) group intervention designed to address FCR in women with breast or ovarian cancer. METHODS: This study was a single-arm multi-site study with pre-, post-, and 3-month follow-up measurement occasions. RESULTS: A total of 56 breast or ovarian cancer survivors enrolled in the study; 44 completed the CE group intervention. Following the intervention, women experienced a reduction in the primary study outcome measure of FCR and secondary study outcome measures of cancer-specific distress and uncertainty. They also reported improvements in secondary study outcome measures of quality of life and coping. The effect sizes of the observed changes were for the most part in the medium to large effect range; furthermore, almost all changes were sustained at 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: This brief intervention appears feasible and has shown promising results in addressing FCR and related secondary outcomes of cancer-specific distress, uncertainty, quality of life, and coping; however, it should be further tested using a randomized controlled study design to more definitively assess its efficacy. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: FCR is a near-universal worry for cancer survivors that, when left unaddressed, tends to remain stable over time. This study has important implications for all cancer survivors as it is the first published intervention that provides preliminary evidence of its efficacy in decreasing fear of cancer recurrence.

Explorando potencialidades para a criação de rede de apoio social a mulheres lusófonas com câncer de mama e que vivem em Toronto, Canadá / Exploring potentialities for the creation of a social support network for Portuguese-Speaking women with breast cancer and who live in Toronto, Canada

Introdução: Indicadores gerais de saúde tendem a alterarem-se devido à participação de indivíduos em redes sociais. Objetivo: Conhecer as ideias dos membros de comunidades lusófonas em Toronto, Canadá, sobre a possibilidade da criação de uma rede de apoio social a mulheres com câncer de mama. Método: Estudo etnográfico crítico com 19 participantes que opinaram sobre a construção de uma rede de apoio social, pontos positivos e negativos, bem como pessoas a serem convidadas a ajudar. As discussões foram transcritas, analisadas e codificadas com o auxílio do programa de análise qualitativa Atlas ti 6.0. Resultados: Os componentes fundamentais para a construção da rede de apoio social foram a desmistificação do câncer de mama e de sua prevenção, ênfase na educação em saúde, divulgação da necessidade de voluntários e apoio social direto às mulheres com câncer. Os pontos positivos seriam a participaçãode mulheres mais idosas como líderes, uso do ambiente escolar e das instituições religiosas para a divulgação. Os empecilhos encontrados foram o câncer de mama ser uma doença vivida pelas mulheres, o desconhecimento relativo à cura e à falta de sensibilização. Em relação à participação de lideranças comunitárias, houve sugestão de diplomatas,padres e pastores, diretores de escolas e empresários da área da comunicação. Conclusão: A criação da rede de apoiosocial deve considerar a sensibilidade cultural e a diversidade interna das comunidades lusófonas. A recomendação é de que líderes sociais e profissionais angolanos sejam convidados para delinear a estrutura da rede de apoio conforme seus traços culturais específicos

Introduction:Health indicators tend to be altered due to the participation of people in social networks. Objective:to find out ideas of individuals belonging to Portuguese speaking communities in toronto,canada, about the possibility of creating a social support network for women experiencing breast cancer...

Exploring the use of the survivorship consult in providing survivorship care.

PURPOSE: Advances in breast cancer treatment have increased survival and contributed to longer periods of survivorship as reported by the Committee CCSsS (Canadian Cancer Statistics) (2011) and Hewitt et al. (2005), increasing the relevance of survivorship care. Survivorship care includes encouraging survivors to acquire the knowledge, skills and confidence to manage their life, as well as engaging survivors through post-diagnosis disease self-management and self-care strategies. The Survivorship Consult (SC) was designed to help survivors reflect on their needs, establish goals and create an action plan. METHODS: Twenty-six breast cancer survivors who participated in the SC at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre took part in semi-structured interviews to assess the survivor experience and effectiveness of the SC. Data from these interviews were coded, and themes were identified using a modified grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Themes that emerged regarding the experience and effectiveness of the SC included (1) the supportive experience of collaborative dialogue with supportive care clinicians (i.e. nurses, social workers, occupational therapists, etc.), (2) the development of personalized goals that motivated individuals to implement recommendations, (3) an enhanced understanding of their health condition, team and options, (4) an improved ability to identify needs and (5) an increased sense of confidence to manage issues related to care. CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of the SC improved the experience of breast cancer patients by providing a supportive environment where they could feel cared about, by increasing understanding of their condition and its treatment, by improving communication with the care team and by motivating patients to manage care issues. Further research is needed on survivors who conduct the SC before the treatment phase of their cancer trajectory.

Helping Her Heal-Group: a pilot study to evaluate a group delivered educational intervention for male spouses of women with breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Distress in husbands of women with early-stage breast cancer may be equivalent to or even higher than their wives. Husbands often struggle to help and support their wives cope with the illness and its treatment. In response, we developed a five-session group educational counselling intervention (Helping Her Heal-Group (HHH-G)) for husbands of women with early-stage breast cancer. The primary aim of the current pilot study was to determine the acceptability and feasibility of HHH-G and to obtain a preliminary estimate of its impact on participating men's skills, self-confidence and self care. Secondary aims were to assess the impact of the intervention on both the participating spouses' and wives' ratings of marital quality and depressed mood. METHODS: The study employed a one-arm, pre-post-intervention design whereby participating men (n=54) and their wives (n=54) independently completed measures at baseline (T0), immediately following the last session (T1) and 3 months after the last session (T2). RESULTS: Overall, there was very high study retention (87%). On the basis of the questionnaire data, we found significant improvements in spouses' self-efficacy (p<0.001) and self-reported skills including wife support (p=0.003) and self-care (p<0.001). In addition, there was a significant improvement in wives' mood scores (p=0.003). Post-intervention interviews support acceptability and impact of the HHH-G intervention, and provide support for the group format of the program. CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility and acceptability of HHH-G was supported, and treatment outcomes suggest the potential benefits of the intervention. Phase III evaluation of HHH-G program is warranted.

A breast reconstruction needs assessment: How does self-efficacy affect information access and preferences?

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer patients requiring mastectomy do not consistently receive information about post-mastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) surgery from the treatment team. Patients have varying levels of self-efficacy, defined as one's confidence in their ability to gather information and make health-related decisions. The present preliminary study was designed to evaluate the relationship between self-efficacy and access to PMBR information. METHODS: A qualitative interview study was conducted on a convenience sample of 10 breast cancer patients considering or having already undergone PMBR and six key health care provider informants. The modified six-item Stanford Self-Efficacy Scale for managing chronic disease was administered. RESULTS: Patient self-efficacy scores ranged from 5 to 9.3 (out of 10). Two main access to information themes were identified from the patient qualitative data: theme A - difficulty initiating the PMBR discussion; and theme B - perceived lack of access to PMBR information with the sub-themes of timing, modality, quantity and content of resources. All respondents expressed their concern over the absence of a standardized process for initiating the dialogue of PMBR. Patients also reported that credible and easily accessible information was not routinely available and expressed a desire to hear about their PMBR options early in the decision-making process. CONCLUSIONS: Health care providers may need to assume more responsibility in standardizing information dissemination on PMBR. This information should be distributed early in the consultation process, the content should be complete, and there may be a role for individualizing the delivery of information based on a patient's level of self-efficacy.

HISTORIQUE: Les patientes atteintes de cancer du sein qui ont besoin de subir une mastectomie ne reçoivent pas systématiquement de l'information sur la reconstruction mammaire après une opération (RMAO) de la part de l'équipe soignante. Les patients ont divers degrés d'autoefficacité, définie comme la confiance en leur habileté à recueillir de l'information et à prendre des décisions liées à leur santé. La présente étude préliminaire a été conçue pour évaluer la relation entre l'autoefficacité et l'accès à l'information sur la RMAO. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Une étude d'entrevue qualitative a été menée sur un échantillon de commodité de dix patientes atteintes du cancer du sein qui envisageaient subir une RMAO ou l'avaient déjà subie et six informateurs qui étaient des professionnels de la santé. Les chercheurs ont administré l'échelle d'autoefficacité modifiée de Stanford en six éléments pour prendre en charge les maladies chroniques. RÉSULTATS: Les indices d'autoefficacité variaient de 5 à 9,3 (sur 10). Les données qualitatives des patientes ont permis de repérer deux grands thèmes d'accès à l'information : thème A ­ difficulté à amorcer la discussion sur la RMAO; et thème B ­ absence perçue d'accès à l'information de la RMAO, ainsi que les sous-thèmes du moment, de la modalité, de la quantité et du contenu des ressources. Tous les répondants ont exprimé leur préoccupation quant à l'absence de processus standardisé pour amorcer le dialogue sur la RMAO. Les patients ont également déclaré qu'il n'était pas systématiquement possible d'obtenir de l'information crédible et facilement accessible et ont exprimé le souhait d'entendre parler des diverses possibilités de RMAO au début du processus de prise de décision. CONCLUSIONS: Les dispensateurs de soins peuvent avoir besoin d'assumer plus de responsabilités dans la standardisation de la diffusion de l'information sur la RMAO. Il faudrait distribuer cette information rapidement dans le processus de consultation, le contenu devrait être complet, et il pourrait être bon de personnaliser la transmission de l'information d'après le taux d'autoefficacité du patient.

The role of a clinician-led reflective interview on improving self-efficacy in breast cancer survivors: a pilot study.

Breast cancer survivors experience a wide range of survivorship issues that are not always adequately addressed. This study is an assessment of the Survivorship Consult (SC), a one-to-one clinician-led reflective interview used to capture a comprehensive summary of the survivor experience, to determine its impact on self-efficacy and the perceived likelihood that it initiates behavior change. Using a pre-test/post-test design, data were collected from participants (N = 40) using validated instruments and opened-ended questions to evaluate the SC. Participants found the SC to be a useful tool for planning and goal setting and improved self-efficacy as measured by the Cancer Behavior Inventory with an increase of 2.0 (p = 0.03). The SC demonstrates promise in improving the ability and confidence of breast cancer survivors to manage their care, but further research is required to understand the optimal implementation of this intervention and its impact on the delivery of survivorship services.