Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27430738

ABSTRACT

We aimed to determine predictors of survival in oesophageal cancer (EC) patients in a high-risk area. This study was conducted on EC patients diagnosed in 2007-2008 in Golestan province, Iran. Diagnostic (DU) and Therapeutic (TU) services utilisation indices were determined. DU and TU indices of 1 were considered as good utilisation. EC-specific survival rates were calculated. Multivariate Cox-regression model was used to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs). Two hundred and twenty-three EC subjects were enrolled. The median survival time was 10.47 months and the 5-year survival rate was 11%. Cox-regression analysis suggested that stage of tumour (AHRregional  = 3.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.34-6.00; AHRmetastasis  = 12.21, 95% CI: 7.42-20.08) and TU (AHR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.25-2.52) were the strongest variables related to EC survival. The median survival time in patients with good and poor TU were 14.37 and 8.53 months respectively (p < .01). There was no significant relationship between DU and EC survival. We found relatively low survival rates in our EC patients when compared with developed countries. Our results also suggested an increasing trend for EC survival rate during recent years. Good TU could predict higher survival rates. Patients' access to therapeutic services may be considered as an important indicator in decision-making for controlling EC.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Iran/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Rural Health/statistics & numerical data , Survival Analysis , Urban Health/statistics & numerical data
2.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) ; 25(2): 318-23, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25801407

ABSTRACT

We aimed to assess healthcare utilisation (HU), its determinants, as well as its relationship with survival in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. This study was conducted on incident CRC cases from Northern Iran. Information on HU was collected using a valid questionnaire, considering eight diagnostic and four therapeutic services. The results were categorised as good and poor HU. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between HU and other variables. Cox regression analysis was performed to determine major predictors of survival. In total, 227 new cases of CRC were enrolled. HU could be assessed in 218 subjects (96%). Living in rural areas was the strongest variable related to poor HU (adjusted OR, odds ratio = 2.65; CI, confidence interval: 1.30-5.40). The median survival time was 40.5 months. The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 71%, 52% and 44% respectively. Cox regression analysis showed a significant lower survival rate in patients with poor HU (HR = 2.3; CI: 1.46-3.64). HU was an independent predictor of survival in our CRC patients. Patients' place of residence was a significant determinant of HU. Regarding its effects on patients' outcome, HU and its determinants should be considered in designing CRC controlling programmes in our region and similar high-risk populations.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Iran , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Proportional Hazards Models , Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data , Rural Population , Surveys and Questionnaires , Survival Rate , Urban Population
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...