ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Letters of recommendation (LORs) are considered by program directors (PDs) to be an integral part of the residency application. With the conversion of USMLE Step 1 to a binary pass/fail outcome, LORs will likely have higher important in the application process moving forward. However, their utility in securing an interview for a particular applicant remains undetermined. This study aims to identify the applicant and LOR characteristics associated with an interview invitation. METHODS: Letter writer (n=977) characteristics were abstracted from applications (n=264) to an individual integrated vascular surgery residency program over 2 application cycles. A validated text analysis program, Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count, was used to characterize LOR content. Applicant, letter writer, and LOR characteristics associated with an interview invitation was determined using multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Letter writers were 70.9% vascular surgeons (VS), 23.7% PDs, and 45.4% professors. Applicants offered an interview were more likely to come from a top 50 medical school (35.2% vs 25.8%, p=0.013) and an institution with a home vascular program (45.5% vs 34.1%, p=0.006). Alpha Omega Alpha membership was significantly associated with interview offer (28.4%, p<0.001). A greater proportion of letters from VS was associated with an interview offer (p <0.001) compared with letter writers of other specialties. One or more PD letters was significantly associated with an interview offer (79.55% vs 20.45%, p=0.008), whereas number of letters from APDs was not significantly associated with interview offer. Letters written by away institution faculty were significantly associated with interview offer (75%, p<0.001), whereas nonclinical letters were not. Presence of one or more letters from a chair (57.95% vs 42.05%, p=0.015) or chief (67.05% vs 32.95%, p=0.028) was significantly associated with interview offer. Letters for applicants offered an interview had more references to research and teaching, which were more common in letters written by VS. Letters written by PDs were more likely to use assertive, advertising language in favor of applicants. There were no significant applicant, letter writer, or LOR characteristics associated with a top 20 rank. CONCLUSION: Successful applicants were more likely to have LORs written by VS, PDs, and those of higher academic rank with references to research and teaching.
ABSTRACT
Minorities, particularly non-White minorities, often encounter implicit biases from healthcare professionals that may impact their standard of care and quality of life. The study of dermatology has long been based on Whites, unintentionally affecting the treatment of non-White patients. Melanoma, although mostly curable, can become fatal in those presenting with advanced stages at diagnosis. Despite being rare in racial minorities, melanoma is associated with a worse prognosis among them compared to White populations. In light of this, the objective of this study was to determine the role of education in preventing biases and improving the diagnosis and treatment of melanoma in minority groups to improve patient outcomes. This study was designed as a scoping review to gather evidence on the impact of implicit bias and lack of education on the treatment of melanoma in people of color. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched for peer-reviewed studies involving melanoma, education, and treatment bias in people of color on the databases PubMed, Medline EBSCO, CINAHL, and Cochrane. The data were extracted pertaining to the following main aspects: (1) risk factors, (2) surveys of current knowledge, and 3) educational interventions. This scoping review identified socioeconomic factors, bias, and lack of education in minority populations as causes of increased mortality rates in melanoma. Moreover, because preventative dermatology is largely based on White skin types, incorporating darker skin tones into education will help dispel implicit bias. Additionally, there is evidence to indicate that current patient knowledge and understanding of skin cancer is inaccurate among many and can be significantly improved through educational interventions, such as brochures and videos. Further educational interventions may be beneficial to increase understanding of melanoma in populations of color to address health disparities in dermatological care.
