Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMC Womens Health ; 22(1): 269, 2022 07 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35787807

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficiency and safety of a novel technique to treat large benign ovarian cysts combining benefits of laparoscopic management along with mini-laparotomy without affection of the ovarian reserve. METHODS: The study included 112 women with large benign ovarian cyst candidate for ovarian cystectomy. The technique started with laparoscopy followed by guided cyst aspiration followed by exteriorization of the ovary through minilaprotomy and completion of cystectomy through microsurgical technique. The primary outcome was ipsilateral recurrence of the cyst. Other outcomes included ovarian reserve assessment and postoperative pain. RESULTS: The number of women with recurrence in the ipsilateral ovary after 12, 18 and 24 months were 5 (4.5%),16 (14.3%),20 (17.85%) respectively. Assessment of ovarian reserve revealed a significant decrease in the level of serum AMH (2.82 ± 0.44 vs. 2.50 ± 0.42) and a significant increase in AFC (3.5 ± 1.7 vs. 4.9 ± 1.3) after our novel technique in surgical treatment of ovarian cysts (P value < 0.001). The operative time was 50 ± 7 and 62 ± 7 min in unilateral and bilateral cysts respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic guided minilaparotomy is a safe and effective technique for the management of large benign ovarian cysts with minimal recurrence rate, ovarian reserve affection and adhesions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinical trial registry no. NCT03370952. Registered 13 December 2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03370952.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Laparotomy , Ovarian Cysts , Female , Humans , Ovarian Cysts/surgery , Ovarian Reserve , Ovary/physiopathology , Ovary/surgery
2.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 147(3): 344-349, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31520402

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) simple rules versus pattern recognition to differentiate between benign and malignant ovarian masses. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study conducted at Kasr El Aini Hospital, Cairo, between April 2016 and October 2018 of 396 women with ovarian masses measuring more than 5 cm who were candidates for surgery. All patients underwent two-dimensional transvaginal sonography: level 2 with IOTA simple rules followed by level 3 with pattern recognition. Patients subsequently underwent ovarian cystectomy or oophorectomy and the specimens were examined histopathologically. Accuracy was measured by comparing sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy. RESULTS: IOTA simple rules specified 44/50 cases as malignant and 220/242 as benign (sensitivity and specificity of 88.0% and 90.9%, respectively). Pattern recognition identified 83/94 cases as malignant and 281/302 as benign (sensitivity and specificity of 88.3% and 92.7%, respectively). No statistically significant difference in accuracy was found between the two methods. CONCLUSION: IOTA simple rules are an effective tool for detecting ovarian malignancy when performed by nonexpert sonographers. When results are inconclusive, pattern recognition should be performed additionally by an expert sonographer. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02800031.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Techniques, Obstetrical and Gynecological/standards , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Ultrasonography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...