Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 138: 105337, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36649819

ABSTRACT

An expert panel was assembled to evaluate reproductive toxicology study data and their application to health risk assessment to provide input on the data quality, interpretation, and application of data from three multi-generation reproductive toxicity studies of N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP). Panelists were engaged using a double-blinded, modified Delphi format that consisted of three rounds. Key studies were scored using the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) questions and general considerations to guide the evaluation of experimental animal studies for systematic review. The primary conclusions of the panel are that one of the studies (Exxon, 1991) is not a high-quality study due to several design flaws that includes: (1) exceedance of the maximum tolerable dose in the high dose group; (2) failure to adjust feed concentrations of NMP during the lactation period, resulting in NMP doses that were 2- to 3-fold higher than nominal levels; and/or (3) underlying reproductive performance problems in the strain of rats used. For these reasons, the panel recommended that this study should not be considered for quantitative risk assessment of NMP. Exclusion of this study, and its corresponding data for male fertility and female fecundity, from the quantitative risk assessment results in a change in the identification of the most sensitive endpoint. Instead, changes in rat fetal/pup body weight, an endpoint previously selected by EPA, was identified as an appropriate basis for human health risk assessment based on a consideration of the best available science and weight of scientific evidence supported by the NMP toxicity database.


Subject(s)
Pyrrolidinones , Reproduction , Humans , Rats , Male , Animals , Female , Pyrrolidinones/toxicity , Fetal Weight , Risk Assessment
2.
Environ Health Perspect ; 108 Suppl 3: 505-9, 2000 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10852850

ABSTRACT

This work group report addresses the central question: What are the critical windows during development (preconception through puberty) when exposure to xenobiotics may have the greatest adverse impact on subsequent reproductive health? The reproductive system develops in stages, with sex-specific organogenesis occurring prenatally and further maturational events occurring in the perinatal period and at puberty. Complex endocrine signals as well as other regulatory factors (genetics, growth factors) are involved at all stages. Evidence from animal models and human studies indicates that many specific events can be perturbed by a variety of toxicants, with endocrine-mediated mechanisms being the more widely studied. Prioritized research needs include basic studies on the cellular-molecular and endocrine regulation of sexual differentiation and development; increased efforts regarding potential adverse effects on development in females, including breast development; expanded animal studies on different classes of chemicals, comparing responses during development (prenatal and postnatal) with responses in adults; and, more extensive explorations regarding the reproductive biology and toxicology of puberty in humans.


Subject(s)
Child Development , Puberty , Reproduction , Urogenital System/drug effects , Xenobiotics/adverse effects , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Embryonic and Fetal Development , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Pregnancy , Reproduction/drug effects , Urogenital System/embryology , Urogenital System/growth & development
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...