Current epidemiology of cerebrospinal fluid shunt surgery in the UK and Ireland (2004-2013).

OBJECTIVES: To determine current epidemiology and clinical characteristics of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt surgery, including revisions. METHODS: A retrospective, multicentre, registry-based study was conducted based on 10 years' data from the UK Shunt Registry, including primary and revision shunting procedures reported between 2004 and 2013. Incidence rates of primary shunts, descriptive statistics and shunt revision rates were calculated stratified by age group, geographical region and year of operation. RESULTS: 41 036 procedures in 26 545 patients were submitted during the study period, including 3002 infants, 4389 children and 18 668 adults. Procedures included 20 947 (51.0%) primary shunt insertions in 20 947 patients, and 20 089 (49.0%) revision procedures. Incidence rates of primary shunt insertions for infants, children and adults were 39.5, 2.4 and 3.5 shunts per 100 000 person-years, respectively. These varied by geographical subregion and year of operation. The most common underlying diagnoses were perinatal intraventricular haemorrhage (35.3%) and malformations (33.9%) in infants, tumours (40.5%) and malformations (16.3%) in children, and tumours (24.6%), post-haemorrhagic hydrocephalus (16.2%) and idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (14.2%) in adults. Ninety-day revision rates were 21.9%, 18.6% and 12.8% among infants, children and adults, respectively, while first-year revision rates were 31.0%, 25.2% and 17.4%. The main reasons for revision were underdrainage and infection, but overdrainage and mechanical failure continue to pose problems. CONCLUSIONS: Our report informs patients, carers, clinicians, providers and commissioners of healthcare, researchers and industry of the current epidemiology of shunting for CSF disorders, including the potential risks of complications and frequency of revision.

The epidemiology of a specialist neurorehabilitation clinic: implications for clinical practice and regional service development.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the epidemiology of referrals to a specialist neurotrauma clinic and explore and highlight implications for clinical practice and service development for persons with head injury/traumatic brain injury (HI/TBI). DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective population-based cohort study of all referrals to a specialist neurotrauma clinic over a 9-year period. Data from a specialist head injury database (which included all persons presenting to hospital with traumatic brain injury) were analysed. RESULTS: In total, 1235 new patients of all ages, severities of injury, both admitted and non-admitted were referred. Referrals have increased due to successful integration with new service developments and resulting optimization of resources. CONCLUSIONS: Data gathered from the cohort gives increased understanding of the characteristics and numbers of patients requiring rehabilitation and adds to the evidence-base. Integration with new and complementary service developments has optimized the function/aims of the clinic and enhanced its role in terms of patient service and outcome and as a research resource. The model provides principles which may be applied to planning, organizing and providing follow-up/rehabilitation services for HI/TBI.

Service use following attendance at an emergency department with an head injury: a 6-month survey.

OBJECTIVES: To survey the attendance of patients presenting with a head injury (HI) at a UK emergency department (ED), identifying numbers, types of service and referral routes; to survey subsequent service use and to highlight the challenges in service planning and identifying which patients may potentially benefit from follow-up/rehabilitation input. DESIGN: A retrospective population-based case series study using multiple prospective and retrospective data sources. METHODS: Adults from the National Health Service (NHS) Cambridgeshire catchment area attending an ED over a 6-month period with a HI were identified from detailed ED reports, and any service use within the hospital after injury was tracked using a number of data sources. RESULTS: 1036 patients presented on 1081 occasions with a HI during the 6 months. Of the 1081 HIs, 979 (91%) were mild (Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score 13-15), 70 (6%) were moderate (GCS score 9-12), and 32 (3%) were severe (GCS score <9). A number of types of referral routes and systems were identified and analysed: 873 (81%) patients were discharged directly from ED, with four offered HI-specific follow-up. Of 208 admissions, 27 (2%) were to neurosurgical care, and 35 (3%) patients were offered HI-specific follow-up, 24 of these being in a specialist neurotrauma clinic. Follow-up started between 1 and 18 months after injury. At 24 months after injury, follow-up for 10 of these was still ongoing. CONCLUSIONS: These study findings highlight the difficulties in identifying patients who would benefit from follow-up, in particular after mild HI. Our study findings will form the basis of a long-term follow-up study.

Efficiency of hospital reporting systems in detecting head injury admissions.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the completeness of data on admission with head injury at a Regional Neuroscience Centre. DESIGN: A comparative study using retrospective and prospective data sources. SUBJECTS: All adults admitted to all specialties with all severities of head injury. METHODS: Adult admissions with 'head injury' in a single month were identified from two sources: (a) prospective ED reports using ED codes for head injury + site 'Head/Face' and 'Reason for attendance', (b) retrospective ICD-10 coding reports of codes S00-09. Data from both sources were compared and reasons for non-capture analysed. Admissions from both reports were combined to obtain a more complete number of admissions with head injury. RESULTS: A total of 112 admissions with head injury were identified from both sources. Completeness from ED reports was 70% (n = 78) and 83% (n = 93) from ICD-10 reports. In total, 53% (n = 59) of admissions were captured in both reports. The main reasons for non-capture in the ED reports were non-coding of head injury (56%, n = 19), and admission via another routes, for example, transfers (44%, n = 15). The main reasons for non-capture in the ICD-10 reports were non-coding of head injury or not the primary diagnosis (74%, n = 14). CONCLUSIONS: Reliable epidemiological data is required for planning and commissioning services, however, identification of head injury admissions is difficult due to ambiguity in terminology and patient population. More than one source is necessary for completeness of data, however, data issues such as comprehensiveness, reliability and inclusion criteria/possible bias need to be considered.

Fixed, dilated pupils following traumatic brain injury: historical perspectives, causes and ophthalmological sequelae.

Pupillary abnormalities are commonly seen in patients presenting with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). The objectives of this study were to determine the underlying condition responsible, the natural history of recovery of third nerve palsy and the ultimate clinical outcome in 60 patients admitted to a regional neurosurgical centre with a diagnosis of TBI and unilateral or bilateral fixed, dilated pupils (FDP). In approximately three-quarters of cases, some form of road traffic incident was the mechanism of injury. In patients presenting with a unilateral FDP, the CT-defined condition was most commonly diffuse brain injury (49%) with no obvious lateralising condition. In 34% of cases CT demonstrated a lateralising condition ipsilateral to the side of the FDP and in 9% cases the FDP was contralateral to the side of the CT abnormality. Of those patients who survived an FDP, 72% were left with some form of ophthalmological deficit. Most patients with bilateral FDP did not survive (88%); however, of those who did survive, none was left in a persistent vegetative state or with any ophthalmological sequelae. A FDP is a grave prognostic sign following TBI commonly resulting in long term ophthalmological sequelae; however, a favourable outcome is still attainable.

Psychological distress does not compromise outcome in spinal surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Physical outcomes following surgery for degenerative spine disease have been well studied whereas the importance of psychological factors has only recently been acknowledged. Previous studies suggest that pre-operative psychological distress predicts poor outcome from spinal surgery. In the drive to identify patients who will not benefit, these patients risk being denied surgery. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective series from a spinal surgical register. AIM: The study examines the relationship between the physical symptoms, pre-operative psychological distress and outcome following surgery. METHODS: The Short Form 36 (SF36) Health Survey Questionnaire and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were administered to patients undergoing elective surgery for degenerative spine disease pre-operatively and at 3 and 12 months post-operatively. Levels of physical disability (SF-36 physical functioning (SF36PF) and bodily pain (SF36BP) scores) and psychological distress (HADS-anxiety and HADS-depression scores) before and after surgery were compared. RESULTS: A total of 302 patients were included (169 men, 133 women, mean age 55 years). Pre-operatively patients had worse physical scores than age-matched controls (SF36PF normative mean (S.D.) 80.97 (12.69) vs. pre-op 33.31 (24.7) P < 0.05). Of the 302 patients, 117 (39%) had significant anxiety or depression. Increased levels of anxiety or depression pre-operatively correlated with worse physical (SF-36PF and SF-36BP) scores pre-operatively (Spearman's r P < 0.05). Levels of anxiety and depression were reduced post-operatively and physical outcomes improved post-operatively. Physical function remained worse in those groups who had high levels of anxiety and depression pre-operatively but when matched for pre-operative physical function, psychological distress did not have any additional effect on outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Poor physical function pre-operatively correlates with psychological distress. Both physical and psychological symptoms improve after surgery. Physical outcome after surgery is strongly influenced by pre-operative physical functioning but not independently by psychological distress. Anxious and depressed patients should continue to be offered surgery if clinically indicated.

Assessing quality of life after traumatic brain injury: examination of the short form 36 health survey.

Measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has an important role in the comprehensive assessment of patient recovery following traumatic brain injury (TBI). We examined the validity of domain and summary scores derived from the Medical Outcomes Survey 36-Item Short Form Health Questionnaire (SF-36) as outcome measures for TBI in a prospective study of 514 patients with a range of functional impairment (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended [GOSE] scores 3-8). Item scaling criteria for the eight domain scores were tested and principal component analysis was used to examine if physical and mental component summary scores were valid. External validity was assessed by comparison with GOSE. Mean response, variance, and distribution of the items were largely equivalent, and item-own scale correlations corrected for overlap all exceeded the threshold for equivalent contribution to domain scores and convergent validity. All corrected item-own scale correlations were greater than the respective item-other correlations indicating no scaling failures, and reliability coefficients for the domain scores were high and substantially more than the inter-domain correlations. Overall, criteria for summing items into domain scores were satisfied, and there was a significant relationship of increasing score with more favorable GOSE class across all domains. However, there were floor and/or ceiling effects in four of the eight domains, and principal component analysis of the domain scores demonstrated only a unidimensional structure to the data. We conclude that individual SF-36 domain scores are valid measures of HRQoL in TBI patients, but that the physical and mental component summaries should be interpreted with caution.

A modified Roland-Morris disability scale for the assessment of sciatica.

BACKGROUND: The Roland-Morris disability scale (RMS) for disability secondary to low back pain is a validated and popular instrument in clinical practice and research. We have made a simple modification to the questionnaire to increase sensitivity to sciatica (RMS-L) and validated this in patients with lumbar disc prolapse and radiculopathy. METHODS: The original RMS and modified RMS-L were prospectively administered to 203 patients presenting with lumbar radiculopathy and intervertebral disc prolapse demonstrated on MRI. Scores at pre-operative assessment and follow-up at 3 months and 12-24 months were compared against visual analogue scores (VAS) and Short Form 36 generic health domains. FINDINGS: Correlation between RMS-L and VAS leg pain was significantly greater than between original RMS and VAS leg pain pre-operatively (r = 0.57 vs. 0.17, p < 0.001) and at 3 months follow-up (r = 0.78 vs. 0.49, p < 0.001). Conversely, correlation between RMS and VAS back pain was significantly higher (r = 0.58 vs. 0.15, p < 0.001). Compared with RMS, at pre-operative assessment, RMS-L showed greater correlation with SF-36 physical function (PF; r = -0.57 vs. -0.32, p < 0.001) and bodily pain (r = -0.58 vs. -0.35, p < 0.001). Similarly, the change in PF to 3 months follow-up showed significantly higher correlation with change in RMS-L compared with the change in RMS (r = -0.60 vs. -0.37, p < 0.001). Effect sizes were good for RMS-L (1.19-1.24) but only moderate for RMS (0.69-0.79). CONCLUSIONS: The original and modified RMS can discriminate disability due to low back pain and sciatica, respectively. Separate assessment of these symptoms and their contribution to functional impairment is useful in assessing suitability for surgery and predicting outcome.

Efficacy of antibiotic-impregnated shunt catheters in reducing shunt infection: data from the United Kingdom Shunt Registry.

OBJECT: In recent years CSF shunt catheters impregnated with rifampicin and clindamycin have been introduced to the United Kingdom (UK) market. These catheters have been shown to be effective in vitro against cultures of Staphylococcus epidermidis. The authors used data collected by the UK Shunt Registry to assess the efficacy of antibiotic-impregnated catheters (AICs) against shunt infection by using a matched-pair study design. METHODS: The UK Shunt Registry contains data on nearly 33,000 CSF shunt-related procedures. The authors identified 1139 procedures in which impregnated catheters had been used, and accurate information was known about diagnosis, number of revisions, sex, and age in these cases. The database was ordered chronologically and searched forward and backward for cases with these same characteristics but involving conventional catheters. Matches were found for 994 procedures. RESULTS: Among the 994 procedures in which AICs had been used, 30 shunts were subsequently revised because of shunt infection. Among the 994 controls, 47 were subsequently revised for infection (p = 0.048, chi-square test). CONCLUSIONS: The UK Shunt Registry does not collect data on causative organisms, and the surgeon is relied on entirely for the diagnosis of infection. However, with the large number of matched pairs evaluated, the authors attempted to reduce bias to a minimum. Their data suggest that AICs have the potential to significantly reduce shunt infections.

Head injury rehabilitation: the role of a neurotrauma clinic.

Survivors of head injury are often left with varying degrees of disability and complex and varied needs, necessitating prolonged periods of rehabilitation and continuing care. Advances have been made in the acute management of these patients, but continuing management in terms of rehabilitation remains deficient with lack of specialist resources and a fragmented service. For head-injured patients, lack of access to appropriate ongoing rehabilitation may have profound effects on outcome and social re-integration. There are also considerable economic implications for planning and provision of services. The aims of this paper are to describe, review and evaluate the role of a Neurotrauma clinic within the Head Injury Service at Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge. The multidisciplinary Neurotrauma clinic commenced in June 2003 following an extensive collaborative research programme to assess current regional head injury service provision and address deficiencies and management issues. Patients of all ages with ongoing problems following varying severity of head injury are followed up at 2 months + post-injury for as long as appropriate. Patients complete an SF-36 and GOSE questionnaire at each clinic appointment and this self-reported data is complemented by neuropsychological assessments, and demographic data entered on a database. The clinic acts as a 'gateway' to access appropriate ongoing rehabilitation and a source of information and support. The routine collection of outcome data enables tracking of individual patient progress and outcome and provides an information resource for further research. The findings highlight deficiencies in rehabilitation both in general service provision and specific patient need. Evidence in support of demand, need and effectiveness of rehabilitation for head injury is particularly relevant within the limited resources of the NHS. Early indications show that a specialist clinic can assist in providing continuity of patient care, in improving coordination of services, and act as a resource for further research on epidemiology, outcome and impact of rehabilitation.

The Short Form 36 health survey in spine disease--validation against condition-specific measures.

Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) assessments in spinal disease offer the potential of outcome measures that better represent patients' disability and response to treatment. The Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) is a generic HRQoL questionnaire that has been extensively used in primary and secondary care, but before it can be routinely applied in patients with spinal disease must be validated against traditional specific measures of physical and mental morbidity. Patients with lumbar disc prolapse, lumbar canal stenosis, and cervical spondylotic radiculomyelopathy were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) and condition-specific questionnaires including the Roland Morris Disability Score (RMDS), Myelopathy Disability Index (MDI), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS), were completed alongside the SF-36 survey at baseline and following surgery. Convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity were assessed by computing correlations between the specific and generic scores. In addition, responsiveness (Standardised Response Mean, SRM) and floor and ceiling effects were examined. Data from 1623 assessments of 620 patients were available. Convergent validity was shown by strong correlations between condition-specific physical scores (MDI or RMDS) and the Physical Function and Bodily Pain domains of SF-36 (rho = -0.52 to -0.76, all p < 0.01). VAS for leg or arm pain were also strongly correlated with Bodily Pain domain scores (rho = -0.54 to -0.77, all p < 0.01). Discriminant validity was confirmed by non-significant partial correlations between Physical Function and Mental Health SF-36 domains when controlled for HADS scores (r = -0.01 to 0.02, p > 0.05). Predictive validity was demonstrated by similar correlations between pre- and post-operative scores for specific and generic instruments. Physical Function, Bodily Pain, and Mental Health domains were all free of significant floor or ceiling effects and showed moderate to good responsiveness (SRM 0.54-1.72). SF-36 domain scores are valid for measuring morbidity and surgical outcomes in common spinal disorders.

Action research in developing knowledge networks.

This paper describes the experiences of the Eastern Head Injury Study in creating a strategic regional head injury service framework using a collaborative action research methodology. The types of data, information and knowledge required to develop and support such a framework for both development and successful implementation are identified. This includes the identification of existing knowledge/information systems, the variability and gaps in these, and how the systems fit together, using a number of evidence-gathering and knowledge-sharing methods. The discussion debates the value of the action research approach and what principles are necessary in developing and maintaining knowledge networks. The project demonstrates that an understanding of the social learning cycle can help in understanding how the pieces fit together, and how the information systems need to be in place to provide the information (or data or knowledge) in the appropriate format to make the learning possible.

Developing services for head injury: obtaining the data.

The aim of this article is to propose standards for data collection in head injury, the commonest cause of death and disability in young people. The objectives include evaluation of an audit methodology. The retrospective review conducted for the Eastern Head Injury Study in the UK identified a variety of problems, notably ambiguous terminology, inadequacies in ICD-10 codes, and inconsistent practices in recording data on head injury. Conclusions are that the standards developed through the review should improve data collection practice, and rehabilitation codes should assist in tracking patient pathways through care.